Skip to content


Exaggerator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: exaggerator Page 1 of about 6,924 results (0.052 seconds)
Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court: Delhi

..... by which injuries caused effect of paras 1017 to 1021 xxxv contradictions inconsistencies exaggeration or embellishment by witnesses effect of hypertechnical approach to be avoided by court ..... person 1075 the testimony of the prosecution witnesses suffers from grave contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in material particulars creating real doubts in its reliability 1076 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
May 07 2021 (SC)

Achhar Singh Vs. The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... were noticed in the passage leading to the village keeping in view the conflicting exaggerations by the prosecution witnesses coupled with the allegation that about sixteen persons entered a ..... witnesses and make intangible observations learned senior counsel highlighted the prosecution witnesses tendency to exaggerate and falsely implicate and pointed out that the four head injuries to the deceased .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Jun 01 1987 (FN)

Turner Vs. Safley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... require particular deference to corrections officials and d whether the regulation represents an exaggerated response to prison concerns the existence of a ready alternative that fully accommodates ..... restriction however does not satisfy the reasonable relationship standard but rather constitutes an exaggerated response to petitioners rehabilitation and security concerns a according to the testimony .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kamala & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Ramphal & Anr. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Vs.kulwinder & Ors.

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Karampal vs.the State of Haryana

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Kulwinder vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Dharambir @ Illa & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
Jan 14 1963 (FN)

Shotwell Mfg. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... find from the record that it was entirely probable that this government witness lubben had exaggerated in giving testimony before the jury he nevertheless reaffirmed his refusal to suppress the incriminating ..... acknowledgment by the district judge that the testimony lubben gave to the jury was probably exaggerated in another case involving a charge by the defendants that it had discovered that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //