Exaggeration - Judgment Search Results

Pooran Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1997CriLJ2253

b k sharma j 1 this is an appeal against the judgment and order d 20 april 1983 passed by...

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court: Delhi

..... by which injuries caused effect of paras 1017 to 1021 xxxv contradictions inconsistencies exaggeration or embellishment by witnesses effect of hypertechnical approach to be avoided by court ..... person 1075 the testimony of the prosecution witnesses suffers from grave contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in material particulars creating real doubts in its reliability 1076 the .....

Achhar Singh Vs. The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... were noticed in the passage leading to the village keeping in view the conflicting exaggerations by the prosecution witnesses coupled with the allegation that about sixteen persons entered a ..... witnesses and make intangible observations learned senior counsel highlighted the prosecution witnesses tendency to exaggerate and falsely implicate and pointed out that the four head injuries to the deceased .....

Turner Vs. Safley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... require particular deference to corrections officials and d whether the regulation represents an exaggerated response to prison concerns the existence of a ready alternative that fully accommodates ..... restriction however does not satisfy the reasonable relationship standard but rather constitutes an exaggerated response to petitioners rehabilitation and security concerns a according to the testimony .....

Kamala & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Ramphal & Anr. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Vs.kulwinder & Ors.

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Karampal vs.the State of Haryana

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Kulwinder vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....

Dharambir @ Illa & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

..... the supreme court in ramesh v state of u p supra that minor contradictions inconsistencies exaggerations and embellishments in the testimonies of the eye witnesses were bound to be there however ..... after exercising care and caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from untruth exaggeration and improvements the court comes to a conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is .....