Essential Commodities Special Provisions Act 1981 Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: essential commodities special provisions act 1981 section 8 Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 332 results (1.38 seconds)Jawahar Lal. Vs. State of Bihar.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-31-2011
..... petition the learned special judge had already ceased to function as special judge in view of expiry of provisions of essential commodities special provisions act 1981 which had come ..... 8 1999 chargesheet was submitted by the police on receipt of the chargesheet by order dated 1 9 1999 the learned special judge nalanda took cognizance of offence under section 7 of the essential commodities act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNab Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-26-2011
..... noted that it was an appeal in respect of the provisions under the essential commodities special provision act 1981 similarly the case of state of bihar versus ..... the accused appellant had preferred a revision petition 68 2011 under section 397 cr p c before the learned sessions judge ajmer ..... one person but valid against another ibid p 352 8 it will be clear from these principles the party .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2011
..... section 3 of the essential supplies temporary powers act 1946 empowered the central government to maintain or increase supplies of any essential commodity ..... special provisions to income tax and for continuation of facilities in certain state institutions etc part viii of the act ..... validity of section 48 2 c of life insurance corporation act 1956 which was inserted retrospectively in 1981 was upheld .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaker (Respondent) Vs. Quantum Clothing Group Limited (Appellants) and ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-13-2011
publications that i have so far reviewed this provided the essential setting in which the seminal code of practice for reducing of appeal core ii pp 749 750 no question of special resources arises since no amount of research would have led reference to safety in section 29 and other similar statutory provisions has been construed as importing the test of reasonable foreseeability of this complex problem provides a sufficient basis for legislation acting on the advice contained in para 533 of the wilson the united kingdom v department of health and social security 1981 ac 800 822 in interpreting an act of parliament it two strands of authority on the meaning of safe in section 29 1 before i come to these i should refer would suffer hearing loss if exposed to noise levels exceeding 85 db a over a prolonged period they should have discovered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarphale Yogita Jagannath and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and or ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-20-2011
officer primary secondary marathwada division aurangabad stating that it is essential to appoint arts teacher for 1st to 8th standards and from amongst the candidates having qualification for making appointment of special teacher drawing teacher in primary school it is provided therein order dated 29th september 2006 further the fact that the provisions of the maharashtra employees of private schools conditions of service school the court naturally relying on the provisions of the act of 1977 and the rules of 1981 took the view runs counter to the provisions contained in the rules of 1981 these petitioners have thus assailed the action of the respondents remedy available to the respondent was to file appeal under section 9 against the order of termination we fail to understand 17 approvals for the appointment of a t d teachers 8 these petitioners have then referred to communication dated 22nd september
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.V.Shivaprasad Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-09-2011
Reported in: ILR2011(1)Ker697
all the abovestatutory provisions clearly indicate why spatial planning is essential in anyplanning process overall it can be seen how important uniformlegislation on town and country planning for wider preparation of specialdevelopment plans regional development plans and district developmentplans urban development plans the light ofthe provisions of the municipality act 1994 the provisions of section 53conferring powers on the district planning committee are of objects and reasons show that apart fromthe kerala municipalities act 1960 and the kerala municipal corporationsact 1961 the guruvayur township and sub section 6 shows that the notification published undersub section 5 shall be conclusive evidence that the scheme has been v pure industrial coke amp chemials ltd and another 2007 8 scc 705 wherein it was held as follows the right
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and anr. Vs. the Direc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2011
..... of the provisions of section 2 15 of the act it will ..... manufacturing or selling a commodity some other commodity which is not a ..... a business activity has four essential characteristics firstly a business must ..... dictionary is exchange of merchandise specially on large scale in ordinary ..... ray versus income tax officer 1981 129 itr 295 sc the ..... 8 similarly the functions of the council can be gathered from section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEx Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2011
and in this situation the board of inquiry was not essential the commanding officer is the statutory authority he has statutory in january 2000 he was promoted to the rank of commodore on 20 10 2003 he was served with a charge the pc act can be tried only by the special judge it is inconceivable that the abettor or the conspirator was unwarranted 8 it is no doubt true that the provisions of section 160 have the mandatory import but what necessitated it may be mentioned that section 25 of the pc act excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to army of tamil nadu v m s hind stone air 1981 sc 711 and peerless general finance and investment co ltd charge nos 4 5 and 6 pertain to offences under section 13 1 e read with section 13 2 of the player by way of gratification and the witness gave rs 8000 in an envelope towards the approximate cost of a vcd
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAvtar Singh Grewal Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2011
supreme court further emphasized that extradition is practised amongst nations essentially for two reasons firstly to warn criminals that they cannot for the petitioner had sought to invoke this doctrine of speciality as also the provisions of section 31 1 c of 19 it is therefore clear from a reading of the provisions of the said act and in particular chapter ii thereof latter crime as observed by the supreme court the said act makes a special provision to that effect and in view a special provision to that effect and in view of section 21 thereof an extradited fugitive cannot be tried in india of india should refuse extradition in the context of article 8 of the said treaty 20 this brings us to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chairman Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
including inspection even in the absence of the permission or essentiality certificate from the state government in terms of the regulations was directed to be posted before this court on being specially ordered 3 heard the arguments of mr isaac mohanlal learned by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants that the provisions of section 10 a do not prohibit the possibility of b and 10 c were inserted in the medical council act by amending act 31 of 1993 similarly the provisions of we do not find any merit in the submission sub section 1 of section 10 a is a substantive provision in mci for this purpose reliance was placed upon the paragraphs 8 9 and 11 of the said judgment which reads as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT