Escalator - Judgment Search Results

Phoenix Overseas Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)56ITD274(Delhi)

1 this appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 1988 89 is directed against order of commissioner of income...

Michael Heath Nathan Johnson Vs. Subhash Chandra and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 60(1995)DLT757

k ramamoorthy j 1 the plaintiff has filed the application for injunction restraining the defendants respondents their servants and agents...

Muslim @ Bhoora Vs. State of U.P. and Khatoon @ Zaitun

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: I(1996)DMC298

c a rahim j 1 none appears on behalf of the revisionist even when the list is revised today is...

Plaut Vs. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

plaut v spendthrift farm inc 514 u s 211 1995 october term 1994 syllabus plaut et al v spendthrift farm...

R.V. Bhupal Prasad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC140; 1995(2)CTC342; JT1995(6)SC258; 1995(5)SCALE41; (1995)5SCC698; [1995]Supp2SCR658

..... of land fixed at rs 1 25 000 per acre held further 10 per cent escalation per year has to be added in respect of acquired land which is abutting national .....

Market Committee, Hodal Vs. Krishan Murari and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(8)SC494; 1995(6)SCALE485; (1996)1SCC311; [1995]Supp4SCR787

..... arbitrator found that fact that claimant received payment only at rate of 21 towards labour escalation would not preclude claimant from claiming at 40 as per contract particularly when it was .....

Sudhir Brothers Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(1)ALT11(SC); 1996(1)ARBLR92(SC); 1995(6)SCALE546; (1996)1SCC32; [1995]Supp5SCR424; 1996(1)LC146(SC)

..... arbitrator found that fact that claimant received payment only at rate of 21 towards labour escalation would not preclude claimant from claiming at 40 as per contract particularly when it was .....

Pehlad Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(8)SC498; 1995(6)SCALE697a; (1996)1SCC310; [1995]Supp5SCR532

..... arbitrator found that fact that claimant received payment only at rate of 21 towards labour escalation would not preclude claimant from claiming at 40 as per contract particularly when it was .....

Hotel Darpan, Mussorie Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate, Mussorie and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(8)SC414; 1995(6)SCALE637; (1996)1SCC323; [1995]Supp5SCR685; [1996]100STC517(SC)

..... arbitrator found that fact that claimant received payment only at rate of 21 towards labour escalation would not preclude claimant from claiming at 40 as per contract particularly when it was .....

State of U.P. Vs. Shakeel Ahmed

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(1)ALD(Cri)151; 1995(4)Crimes782(SC); 1996(54)ECC77; JT1995(8)SC561; 1995(6)SCALE732; (1996)1SCC337; [1995]Supp5SCR737

..... arbitrator found that fact that claimant received payment only at rate of 21 towards labour escalation would not preclude claimant from claiming at 40 as per contract particularly when it was .....