Erstwhile - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: erstwhile Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 74 results (0.013 seconds)State of Maharashtra Etc. Vs. Madhavrao Damodar Patilchand and ors. Et ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-10-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1395; (1969)71BOMLR141; 1969MhLJ17(SC); [1968]3SCR712
..... the jurists of international law recognise the continuity of title to immovable property of the erstwhile citizens of the ceding state after the sovereignty changed over to the absorbing state it ..... become crystallized and thereunder the change of sovereignty does not affect the title of the erstwhile citizens of the ceding state to their property in america the said principle of international .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Narayana Raju Vs. G. Chamaraju and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-19-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1276; [1968]3SCR464
..... 6 16 as that of the other branch those assets of the erstwhile larger joint family which could not be physically divided were auctioned ..... the price determined at the family auction but the original cost to erstwhile larger joint family the tribunal held that the 6 16 share ..... a transfer but the substance of the transaction is that an erstwhile member of a joint hindu family who has only an interest .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMusamia Imam Haider Bax Razvi Vs. Rabari Govindbhai Ratnabhai and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-21-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC439; (1969)71BOMLR681; 1969MhLJ513(SC); [1969]1SCR785
..... been finally superseded will become eligible for promotion to captain time scale only after all erstwhile acting commanders select list had been promoted to captain select list captain time scale retired ..... been finally superseded will become eligible for promotion to captain time scale only after all erstwhile acting commanders select list had been promoted to captain select list capitan time scale .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.C. Mohindra Vs. the Municipal Board Saharanpur
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC729; (1969)1SCC56; [1969]2SCR794
..... of that firm but that would not create a legal right in favour of the erstwhile partners to a share in the quota because the chief controller could refuse to recognise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. Gurunath V. Dhakappa
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-1968
Reported in: [1969]72ITR192(SC)
..... accountant cum office superintendent in the electric supply undertaking run by the government of the erstwhile state of madhya bharat he was prosecuted along with k an assistant superintendent in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMysore State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chairman Central O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-26-1968
..... respondents was that they had been appointed by the superintendent road transport department of the erstwhile state of hyderabad who will be hereinafter referred to as the superintendent and the said ..... superintendent who appointed the respondents was the head of the road transport department of the erstwhile hyderabad state and the only authority above him was the government in the mysore government .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMerey Soans Vs. State of Mysore by Its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-05-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Kant348; AIR1969Mys348
..... restricted only to the physical instructors who arrived from the erstwhile state of hyderabad the pay scale which retrospectively became effective ..... was also made available only to the allottees from the erstwhile state of hyderabad 5 the resultant position was that under ..... available to the physical instructors who were allotted from the erstwhile state of hyderabad with effect from the dates from which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTViney Kumar Majoo Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1968Raj227; (1968)IILLJ398Raj
..... open to the respondents to retrench the services of the petitioner before that of the erstwhile respondents yet accordins to section 25g it was necessary for the respondents to record reasons ..... impugned order does not record any reason whatsoever for retrenching the petitioner prior to the erstwhile respondents as i have already observed above these respondents too came to be retrenched but .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaza Sugar Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-05-1968
Reported in: [1970]76ITR541(All)
..... assessee is a limited liability company and was incorporated in the erstwhile state of rampur it carries on the business of manufacturing sugar ..... to the extension of the act to the territory of the erstwhile rampur state 9 dissatisfied with the assessment made by the ..... depreciation being actually allowed to the assessee company either by the erstwhile state of rampur or by the government of india we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. R. Dwarkadas and Co.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-19-1968
Reported in: [1971]80ITR283(Bom)
..... that the partnership had continued with the three persons including the erstwhile minor as a partner thereof in the year of account ..... there was no doubt whatsoever that the erstwhile minor who had not himself signed the endorsement had assented ..... document executed on 24th february 1955 by this document jaisingh the erstwhile minor partner shown in the first partnership deed had in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial