Erstwhile - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: erstwhile Sorted by: recent Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.02 seconds)Ponjurangam and Others. Vs. Darshanala Swamy and ors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-27-2011
..... by adverse possession 8 to prove the title what becomes essential is to identify the erstwhile owner of the property and then to explain the manner in which it has accrued .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Rep. by Central Bureau of Investig Vs. V.D.Rajgopal.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2011
..... is to be noted that still in 2 g scam the principal accused who was erstwhile minister and his private secretary who is a public servant are not yet released by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-i, Vs. Ms.Hansa Footwear.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2011
..... facts of that case that the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile firm were taken over by the company with the same persons ..... under chapter ix of the companies act the shareholding of the erstwhile partnership firm remained the same upon conversion of the firm into ..... tax appeals had erroneously decided that the closing stock of the erstwhile firm should be valued at the market price 18 under the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai Rattan Bhalla and anr Vs. Puri Investments and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-23-2011
..... since september 2006 and no efforts are being made by the erstwhile managing co owner to let out the premises which could ..... made and replied to by the defendants on 20 10 2009 erstwhile managing co owner wrote to the plaintiffs by replying the plaintiffs ..... upon the partner or person then any covenant entered between the erstwhile partners to treat themselves as co owners without the actual conveyance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNallammal and anr. Vs. State of Tamilnadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
..... 65 acres in s no 19 2 in vagurampatti village of namakkal taluk in the erstwhile salem district belonging to the appellants in w a no 876 of 2009 were sought ..... s nos 58 4 and 61 6 of kondichettipatti village of namakkal taluk in the erstwhile salem district were sought to be acquired by the government for construction of houses under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTicici Bank Ltd Vs. Chuandong Xu and anr. D
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
..... been deposed by this witness that currently icici group in addition to the subsidiaries of erstwhile icici also comprises of various companies involved in businesses ranging from investment banking life and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajambal Vs. the Inspector General (Registration) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
..... section 77 1 the role of the registering officer under the registration rules 12 the erstwhile state government appears to have approved a set of rules known as the registration rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTopara Rajender and Others Vs. Govt. of A.P.,rep.by Its Secretary to G
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
..... an issue of public interest namely whether acquired land can be re conveyed to the erstwhile owner at any point of time on the mere asking if this question is answered ..... in the affirmative large chunks of acquired land may be re conveyed to the erstwhile owners of the land although the petitioners have not specifically made out such a case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTopara Rajender and Others Vs. Govt. of A.P.,rep. by Its Secretary to ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-22-2011
..... an issue of public interest namely whether acquired land can be re conveyed to the erstwhile owner at any point of time on the mere asking if this question is answered ..... in the affirmative large chunks of acquired land may be re conveyed to the erstwhile owners of the land although the petitioners have not specifically made out such a case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRunu Ghosh Vs. C.B.i
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2011
..... explanation itself partially corroborates the allegation if indeed there was some joint venture between two erstwhile rivals the question which still crl a nos 482 02 509 02 and 536 02 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial