Equalisation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equalisation Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.008 seconds)Youngstown Co. Vs. Bowers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1959
youngstown co v bowers 358 u s 534 1959 u s supreme court youngstown co v bowers 358 u s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaley Vs. Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1959
raley v ohio 360 u s 423 1959 u s supreme court raley v ohio 360 u s 423 1959...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUphaus Vs. Wyman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1959
uphaus v wyman 360 u s 72 1959 u s supreme court uphaus v wyman 360 u s 72 1959...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovindrao Krishnarao Bhuskute and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-20-1959
Reported in: AIR1959MP339
bhutt c j 1 this order shall also dispose of letters patent appeal no 133 of 1956 both these cases...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSm. Katip Bibi Vs. Fakir Chandra Ghosh and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-20-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Cal187
b n banerjee j 1 the plaintiff is the appellant before me 2 the suit out of which this second...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. and State of Delhi (Now Delhi Administra ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-1959
Reported in: AIR1960SC475; [1960]2SCR627
..... persons enumerated above to pay such amount on account of allowances for contribution to any equalisation fund within such period and in such manner as the controller may direct in this ..... disadvantages he is empowered to require the parties concerned to make a contribution to the equalisation fund and the maximum prices which he has to fix have to be fixed separately .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Corporation of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Sarat Chandra Ghatak and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-28-1959
Reported in: AIR1959Cal704
..... thereby shown that the duties prescribed in this act do not equalise said differences and shall further find it thereby shown that the ..... in the united states and the principal competing country cannot be equalised by proceeding under the provisions of sub section a of ..... shown by the said differences in costs of production necessary to equalise such differences but no such rate shall be decreased more .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKasibhatla Satyanarayana Sastrulu and ors. Vs. Kasibhatla Mallikarjuna ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-1959
Reported in: AIR1960AP45
..... common for the amount for which he is accountable to the other sharers and thus equalise the sharers the theoretical allotments and the general declaration of rights in the preliminary decree .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThanmal Surana and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1959Raj206
..... direction that one finds is about the allowance for contribution to and payment from any equalisation fund and also that the controller may provide for any other disadvantages it was therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCt. A. Ct. Nachiappa Chettiar and ors. Vs. Ct. A. Ct. Subramaniam Chet ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-13-1959
Reported in: AIR1960SC307; [1960]2SCR209
..... of the family between the parties and if necessary also by payment of monies to equalise the shares and to take the necessary accounts and to decide all matters in dispute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial