Equal - Judgment Search Results

Stadler Vs. State Board of Equalization of California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... california 380 u s 252 1965 u s supreme court stadler v state board of equalization of california 380 u s 252 1965 380 u s 252 stadler et al executors ..... v state board of equalization of california appeal from the district court of appeal of california second appellate district no .....

Sayyed Rahmanmiya Mustafamiya Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1966Guj200; (1965)GLR978

..... fifteen years divided into fifteen annual instatment each instalment being equal to the assessment on the holding as fixed under section ..... if that statute itself provides that the annuity shall be equal to one assessment whatever that assessment is when it becomes ..... that these sections confer on the barkhalidar is to receiveannuity equal to one assessment and as already stated section 19 itself .....

Shanti Prasad JaIn Vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1535; [1965]35CompCas351(SC); (1965)1CompLJ193(SC); [1965]2SCR720

..... company would have three groups of shareholder represented by the appellant patnaik and loganathan holding equal number of shares besides a french company and one rath who between themselves held shares ..... the argument that the three parties concerned inthe agreement intended that their shareholdings should remain equal evenlater but this intention cannot be said to bind the company much lessso when .....

SwaIn Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the first cases applying the fourteenth amendment to racial discrimination held that under the equal protection clause a state cannot systematically exclude persons from juries solely because of their ..... discriminatory selection of juries on racial grounds and will thereby impair the constitutional promise of equal protection of the laws made effective by strauder and the cases which follow it .....

Fortson Vs. Dorsey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the county wide voting requirement in the seven multi district counties violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment a three judge district court granted appellees motion ..... multimember or floterial districts whatever the means of accomplishment the overriding objective must be substantial equality of population among the various districts so that the vote of any citizen is .....

Griswold Vs. Connecticut

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the covenant violated the rights of prospective negro purchasers to equal protection although no negro was a party to the suit ..... and applied to the states because they are fundamental apply with equal force and to the same extent against both federal and ..... relied on by my brethren were decided either solely under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment or under the first amendment .....

Carrington Vs. Rash

Court: US Supreme Court

..... texas 1964 a three judge court recently declared this same provision unconstitutional as violating the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment footnote 2 the self evident purpose of the ..... the fourteenth amendment and the course of judicial decision which together plainly show that the equal protection clause was not intended to touch state electoral matters see my dissenting opinion .....

Department of Mental Hygiene Vs. Kirchner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court found that the state statute creating support liability violates the basic constitutional guaranty of equal protection of the law held since the california court did not specify whether its holding ..... federal constitution which prohibits a state from denying to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws has been similarly construed footnote 5 an examination of the .....

Thacker and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1966]61ITR540(Guj)

..... that the shares in the losses of the major partners were equal it was further contended that the firm which was constituted under ..... partners the principle is that the losses should be shared either equally where the agreement does not also provide for the individual shares ..... hereby agree that the shares allotted to different partners will be equal i e each partner will get five shares 10 after meeting .....

Padmavati Jaykrishna Trust and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gu ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1966]61ITR66(Guj)

..... said jaykrishna harivallabhadas for their own use and benefit absolutely in equal shares to the intent and effect that the share of ..... high court held that under the document the beneficiaries had equal share in the income the beneficiaries had no specified share ..... 1957 the number of beneficiaries was definite and their shares being equal there was no question of their shares being indeterminate or .....