Skip to content


Engineering - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: engineering Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 598 results (0.231 seconds)
1799

Breckbill Vs. Lancaster Turnpike Co

Court: US Supreme Court

..... c that the president managers amp c the defendants by and with their superintendants surveyors engineers artists and chain bearers workmen and labourers with their tools amp c entered in and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1821

Cohens Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pumps and in the preservation of springs in erecting and repairing wharves in providing fire engines and other apparatus for the extinction of fires and for other local improvements and purposes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1828

Parker Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... certificate from richard cutts second comptroller of the treasury that the senior officer of the engineer department stationed at washington has charged and been allowed double rations since 1 january ..... the war department allowing to the quartermaster general commissary general of subsistence the colonel of engineers and the chief of the ordnance department while stationed at the seat of government .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1829

Van Ness Vs. Pacard

Court: US Supreme Court

..... atk 13 the same doctrine was held in the case of a fire engine set up to work a colliery by a tenant for life lord ..... have already seen that it made no difference whether the shed of the engine be made of brick or stone in penton v robart 2 east 88 ..... expressly stated that there was no difference between the building covering any fixed engine page 27 u s 147 utensils and the latter the only point is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1831

Livingston Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... goods and chattels of the plaintiff in the replevin to wit the steamboat sandusky her engines amp c and unjustly detains them amp c to the declaration the defendant smith pleaded .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1835

Bradley Vs. Washington, A. and G. S. P. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... witness and duly sworn in the cause that he was employed as engineer by defendant on board the steamboat sydney mentioned in the foregoing ..... round to baltimore for the purpose of being fitted with her engine and other equipments necessary to complete her for running on said ..... basin at baltimore before she had been completely equipped with her engine that at the time she was so frozen up she wanted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1835

Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company Vs. Knapp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... use if it be so supplied may be limited by the engineer to a certain distance from the face of the wall the ..... deponent can further state that the opinion of the late resident engineer daniel van slyke esq agreed with that of this deponent above ..... hindered for want of cement the deponent was directed by the resident engineer to communicate the order to the plaintiffs and did accordingly communicate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1836

New Orleans Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or causing to be erected and kept in operation a steam engine or engines for conveying water into the said city and all buildings necessary ..... colonies on receiving these instructions issued their orders to the chief engineer of the colony or in default of such officers to a ..... of the navy and of french colonies nicholas broutin was the engineer of the king of france in louisiana 20 authentic copies of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1836

Wetmore Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act the assistant adjutants general assistant inspectors general deputy quartermasters general and assistant topographical engineers are declared to have the brevet rank and the pay and emoluments of a ..... is that the assistant adjutants general assistant inspectors general deputy quartermasters general and topographical engineers shall have the brevet rank and the pay and emoluments of a major of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1837

Waters Vs. Merchants' Louisville Insurance Company

Court: US Supreme Court

..... shall come to the hurt or detriment of the steamboat her engine tackle and furniture according to the true intent and meaning of ..... not lost in the sum of 6 000 on the steamboat lioness engine tackle and furniture to navigate the western waters usually navigated by ..... come to the hurt detriment or damage of the said steamboat engine tackle and furniture according to the true intent and meaning of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //