Emption - Judgment Search Results

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-vi, New Delhi Vs. R.L. Bhargava

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 96(2002)DLT322; [2002]256ITR42(Delhi)

s b sinha c j 1 the following questions have been referred to this court for its opinion by theincome...

Shri Dinesh Khimavat Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1 this is an application for waiver and stay of collection of rs 50 000 as penalty imposed on the...

Sunil Krishna Ghosh and anr. Vs. Calcutta Improvement Trust

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2001Cal199

sengupta j 1 this is a suit for in substance specific performance of an agreement for sale of three plots...

H.K. Dass Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2003(159)ELT119(P& H)

..... punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre emption has been substantially abolished in haryana also no steps even have been taken in that .....

Jasdeep Singh Vs. Nafe Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2001ACJ1520

..... punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre emption has been substantially abolished in haryana also no steps even have been taken in that .....

Karnail Singh Vs. Sukhjeet Kaur

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: I(2002)DMC121

..... punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre emption has been substantially abolished in haryana also no steps even have been taken in that .....

Harpreet Kaur Vs. Rajwant Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: I(2002)DMC17

..... punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre emption has been substantially abolished in haryana also no steps even have been taken in that .....

Lorillard Tobacco Co. Vs. Reilly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of cigarette advertising fclaa 4 second it expanded the scope of the advertising pre emption provision where previously states were prohibited from requiring particular statements in cigarette advertising ..... nine justices subscribed to opinions that explicitly tethered the scope of the pre emption provision to congress concern with diverse nonuniform and confusing cigarette labeling and advertising .....

Egelhoff Vs. Egelhoff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... plans and is therefore pre empted iii respondents suggest several reasons why ordinary erisa pre emption analysis should not apply here first they observe that the washington statute allows employers to ..... dissenting like justice scalia i believe that we should apply normal conflict pre emption and field pre emption principles where as here a state statute covers erisa and nonerisa documents alike .....

Buckman Co. Vs. Plaintiffs' Legal Comm.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pre emptive conflict here because congress included an express pre emption provision in the mda see brief for respondent 37 to ..... extent respondent posits that anything other than our ordinary pre emption principles apply under these circumstances that contention must fail in ..... medtronic did not squarely address the question of implied pre emption it is clear that the medtronic claims arose from the .....