Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees provident fund amp miscellaneous provisions act 1952 section 15 special provisions relating to existing provident funds Page 1 of about 513 results (0.223 seconds)

S.Sundar and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... that the petitioners are given benefits under various legislation, such as, plantations labour act, 1951, the industrial employment (national and festival holidays) act, 1981, the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, and the payment of bonus act, 1965. it is stated that the petitioners are paid minimum wages as notified by the government ..... section 3 of the permanent status to workmen act. 12. the judgment relied on by the learned counsel for the respondents in indian drugs & pharmaceuticals limited v. workmen, indian drugs & pharmaceuticals limted ((2007) 1 scc 408), is not applicable to the facts of the present cases. 13. this court in s.vijayalakshmi ..... any order of the management. it is also true that jurisdiction has been conferred on the inspector to conduct enquiry if necessary to find out whether an employee has completed 480 days or not. however, when facts are not in dispute, merely because no such enquiry had been conducted by the inspector, the .....

Gunvantrai Harivallabh Jani Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970MP221; 1970MPLJ226

..... that notification reads:'g. s. r. 346. in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 1 of the employees' provident funds act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the central government hereby applies the said act with effect from 30th april 1962 to every trading and commercial establishment employing twenty or ..... .1. this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution is directedagainst-(i) an order dated february 8, 1967 holding that the provisions of the employees provident funds act, 1952 (hereinafter called the act) were rightly applied to the petitioner's establishment; (ii) an order dated april 15, 1967 declining to review ..... the principles of natural justice.'in cases to which the act is sought to be applied, the employer is required to make regular contributions towards the provident fund of employees and, therefore, the enquiry to be made by the authority concerned involves a determination of the employer's rights and liabilities in the matter. although .....

C.Lalitha Raj Vs. the Assistant General Manager

Court : Chennai

..... air 1976 sc 1163, laying down as under:we may state without fear of contradiction that provident fund amounts, pensions and other compulsory deposits covered by the provisions we have referred to, retain their character until they reach the hands of the employee. the reality of the protection is refunded to illusory formality if we accept the interpretation sought. ..... or other credit facility. the general lien of bankers is part of law merchant and judicially recognised as such." in brandao v. barnett (1846) 12 cl & fin 787 it was stated as under : "bankers most undoubtedly have a general lien on all securities deposited with them as bankers by a customer, unless there ..... it has been laid down as under: 5. the question of bankers lien/general lien fell for consideration before the supreme court in syndicate bank vs vijay kumar & ors. reported in air 1992 sc 1066. the provision of section 171 of the indian contract act, 1872 was also noticed in the said case. taking into .....

Asoke Basak. Vs. State of Maharasthra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or not who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident fund or family pension fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall ..... be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said fund in ..... law as aforesaid. explanation 2.--a person, being an employer, who deducts the employees' contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the employees' state insurance fund held and administered by the employees' state insurance corporation established under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (34 of 1948), shall be deemed to have .....

Supreme Tyres Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... is questioning the validity of the proceeding and order dated october 22, 2003 under section 14-b of the employees' provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 ('the act' for short) issued by the assistant provident fund commissioner, sub-regional office, shillong (the respondent no. 3) and of the order dated june 15, 2004 ..... sic) the institution complied with the said direction. however, the respondent- institution continued to deposit the amounts with the university and not with the provident fund commissioner. it was only after about two years and a half long years that the respondent-institution withdrew the amounts deposited with the university with ..... the latter's permission and then re-deposited the same with the regional provident fund commissioner. holding that the act of re-depositing the amounts with the permission of the university could not afford protection against the consequences of .....

Anand Kumar Mohatta Vs. State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) Department of Ho ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... employer [of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or not]. who deducts the employee s contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident fund or family pension fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be ..... deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said fund in ..... aforesaid.]. 9 [explanation 2. a person, being an employer, who deducts the employees contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the employees state insurance fund held and administered by the employees state insurance corporation established under the employees state insurance act, 1948 (34 of 1948), shall be deemed to have been .....

The Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd Vs. The ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... agricultural development bank service common cadre rules 1978 as under: rule existing amended 15 (i) provident fund (i) the employees shall be the employees shall be entitled to entitled to the benefits of the the benefit of the general provident contributory provident fund fund as provided in the employees as provided in the provident fund act, 1952 and employees provident fund & scheme framed thereunder. miscellaneous act, 1952 and schemes framed thereunder. (ii) the pension scheme for ..... the (ii) deleted. employees/officers in the common 11 cadre rules of the punjab state cooperative agricultural development bank w.e.f .....

Independent Schools Federation Of India (regd.) Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ahmedabad private primary teachers association (supra), and states that the legislature, to cover the definition of employee to all kinds of employees, has used language similar to the wide language of clause (f) of section 2 of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952. it is also crystal clear that the parliament has passed and ..... the industrial disputes act, 1947, this court pointed to the difference in the definition of word employee in the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952. accordingly, teachers who impart education to students were held not to be an employee under section 2(e) of the pag act as they do not perform any kind of ..... 4 scc225 civil appeal no.8162 of 2012 and others page 7 of 35 employee all kinds of employees, it could have as well used such wide language as is contained in section 2(f) of the employees' provident funds act, 1952 which defines employee to mean any person who is employed for wages in any kind of work .....

Checkmate Services P Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... made in the first proviso equated in terms of the benefit of deduction of tax, duty, cess and fee on the one hand with contributions to the employees' provident fund, superannuation fund and other welfare funds on the other. however, the finance act, 2003, bringing about this uniformity came into force with effect from 1-4-2004. therefore, the argument of ..... march [end of accounting year]. but before filing of the returns under the income tax act and the date of payment falls after the due date under the employees' provident fund act, they will be denied deduction for all times. in view of the second proviso, which stood on the statute book at the relevant time, each of such ..... march (end of accounting year) but before filing of the returns under the income tax act and the date of payment falls after the due date under the employees' provident fund act, they will be denied deduction for all times. in view of the second proviso, which stood on the statute book at the relevant time, each of .....

Patel Engineering Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 1. a person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or not who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident fund or family pension fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been ..... 1. a person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or not who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident fund or family pension fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been .....