Emphasise - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri S.K. Katyal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2009)221CTR(Del)310; [2009]308ITR168(Delhi); [2009]177TAXMAN380(Delhi)

section 187 of the indian penal code 45 of 1860 emphasis supplied 14 these provisions make it clear that a search

M/S. Poulose and Mathen Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC965; 1997(90)ELT264(SC); JT1997(2)SC213; 1997(1)SCALE661; (1997)3SCC50

be taken as equally applicable to the transactions in question emphasis supplied 9 we heard counsel 10 appellants counsel stressed two

United Electrical Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)178CTR(Del)192

148 read with section 151 2 of income tax act emphasis here italicised in print supplied sd sugan chand mittal income

Mitradhar Barkakati and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

of a copy of this judgment and order no cost emphasis supplied 5 it would appear from the above office memorandum

Om Prakash Dwivedi Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1996CriLJ603

red handed and the crime is patent to high heaven emphasis supplied 6 it is apparent from these observations that what

Babu Ram Gupta Vs. Sudhir BhasIn and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1528; 1979CriLJ952; (1980)3SCC47; [1979]3SCR685

this licence accordance with the above direction of this court emphasis ours 3 a perusal of the order extracted above clearly

Subordinate Services Selection Board Vs. Bir Singh and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1472; JT1997(10)SC574; 1995(2)SCALE834; 1995Supp(2)SCC651; 1995(2)LC189(SC)

this entitlement would be available to one dependent child only emphasis supplied 5 a reading of these conditions would clearly indicate

State of Bihar and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. Bihar Distillery Ltd., Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)153; AIR1997SC1511; 1997(1)BLJR551; JT1996(10)SC854; 1996(8)SCALE768; (1997)2SCC453; [1996]Supp9SCR479

force the provisions of this act shall have the effect emphasis supplied 12 the portions underlined by us clearly bring about

Guru Bux Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2008CriLJ2671; RLW2008(3)Raj2399

9 the writ petitions stand disposed of as indicated above emphasis supplied 4 the state of rajasthan although in its wisdom

In Re: Rt. Rev. Casmir Gnanadickam Archbishop of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)2MLJ418

petition by the petitioner is not maintainable and so dismissed emphasis is mine so unless there is some other statute enacting