Elementality - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: elementality Year: 1965 Page 1 of about 251 results (0.013 seconds)Gobald Motor Service (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-1965
Reported in: [1966]60ITR417(SC)
..... no 9 1872 section 29 s b sinha h s bedi jj vagueness price essential element of binding contract held it is well settled that a definite price is an essential ..... element of a binding agreement although a definite price need not be stated in the contract .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Zahirabi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ921
..... of the apex court as well as the full bench is if there is an element of compulsion in the government policy which infringes the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens ..... 21 29 2 and 30 1 of the constitution of india challenge is mainly against element of compulsion found in clause 6 of the government order under which mother tongue or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVr.Kr.S. Firm Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-17-1965
Reported in: [1966]60ITR425(SC)
..... no 9 1872 section 29 s b sinha h s bedi jj vagueness price essential element of binding contract held it is well settled that a definite price is an essential ..... element of a binding agreement although a definite price need not be stated in the contract .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrashekar Gurupadappa Kaladagi Vs. Basawanneppa Shidappa Mali and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-12-1965
Reported in: AIR1966Kant17; AIR1966Mys17; (1965)1MysLJ429
..... of the apex court as well as the full bench is if there is an element of compulsion in the government policy which infringes the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens ..... 21 29 2 and 30 1 of the constitution of india challenge is mainly against element of compulsion found in clause 6 of the government order under which mother tongue or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarju Prasad Saha Vs. the State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-03-1965
Reported in: AIR1965SC1763; 1966(14)BLJR33
..... adverse and conflict claims of property but also emergency danger or loss demanding immediate action element of danger is an important consideration ordinarily a receiver would not be appointed unless a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Kerala Vs. N. Sami Iyer Tobacco Merchant
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-26-1965
Reported in: 1965(0)KLT1219(SC); [1966]2SCR361; [1966]17STC338(SC)
..... wholesale trade is determined it is implicit that no excise duty is payable on an element of excise duty in the price the value as contemplated under s 4 cannot include .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Mysore Vs. Padmanabhacharya Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-1965
Reported in: AIR1966SC602; (1966)IILLJ147SC; [1966]1SCR994
..... indivisible if it is the latter it would not be taxable because there is no element of sale of goods within that transaction if it is the former the clement of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-18-1965
Reported in: AIR1966SC385; [1966]1SCR505
..... section is based on principle of joint liability common intention amongst participants is an essential element proof of some overt act by every participant is not necessary sections 34 300 common .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Kishore Sen and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-11-1965
Reported in: AIR1966SC644; [1966]1SCR430
..... section is based on principle of joint liability common intention amongst participants is an essential element proof of some overt act by every participant is not necessary sections 34 300 common .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Punjab and anr. Vs. Hari Krishan Sharma
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-09-1965
Reported in: AIR1966SC1081; [1966]2SCR982
..... beyond this would be to destroy the stability of legislation and to introduce an uncertain element to go further and to depend upon a notification of a transitory nature issued under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial