Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 80 results (0.083 seconds)

Feb 26 2008 (HC)

Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and Etc. Vs. Vishal Agrawal and o ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2008Chh57

..... the statement of objects and reasons for amending the act, it was stated was under;4. as per the provisions contained ..... committed to it for trial.(6) the cognizance of the offence under the act shall not in any way prejudice the actions under the provisions of the indian penal code.the principal electricity act, 2003 was further amended by the electricity (amendment) act, 2007 and apart from other amendments section 151 of the principal act was also amended and provisos in sections 151, 151-a, and 151-b were inserted. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2014 (HC)

M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Anoth ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... or the distributor as the case may be. 35. (i) the constitutional validity of section 3 of central province and berar electricity duty act, 1959 as amended by madhya pradesh taxation law (amendment) act, 1956 came to be considered before the division bench of the madhya pradesh high court in case of j. c. mills ..... (c.g.) indiaph.: 07715050714, 5093321 -24 fax: 0771-5093320 ref: muul/pp/spn/gr/2007/ date: 10.04.2007 the chief electrical inspector 36/437, byron bazar, phauvara chowk, near govt. chhattisgarh college raipur 492001 subject: electric generation report of muul-power plant siltara, raipur for the month of march2007. dear sir, enclosed ..... to: de (safety), 3/7889, civil lines raipur. ***** language 42. the aforesaid statutory information required under the rules of 1949 submitted right from march-2007 to march-2012 firstly by the muul and thereafter by petitioner company would clearly demonstrate that the both the companies had unmistakable terms unequivobly stated while submitting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2015 (HC)

Yadram (Dead) Through LRs. and Others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh an ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... legislations take effect from the date they are issued and not from any prior date. in the present case, period of application of the amendment has already been mentioned in the amending act, therefore the amending act would be operative for the transaction made between 2-10-1959 till 24-10-1980 and not prior to 2-10-1959. 6. to ..... high court of chhattisgarh rules, 2007. vide order dated 3-9-2014, hon'ble the chief justice has directed to place the reference before this bench to answer the following referred question of law: - "whether the provision of section 170-b of the chhattisgarh land revenue code, 1959 inserted vide m.p. amendment act no.15 of 1980 with ..... if possible so as to respect vested rights. the learned advocate general also placed reliance in the matter of purbanchal cables and conductors private limited v. assam state electricity board and another ((2012) 7 scc 462) in which while dealing with the scope of operation of law as retrospective, the supreme court has held that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2011 (HC)

Atahar Ali Khan Vs. Chairman Coal India Ltd and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... would amount to converting a review petition into an appeal in disguise."7. the explanation below rule 2 of order 47 by the civil procedure code (amendment) act, 1976 was inserted. the same reads as under:"explanation.- the fact that the decision on a question of law on which the judgment ..... state of orissa and others, government of t.n. and others v. m.ananchu asari and others.6. in the matter of kerla state electricity board v. hitech electrothermics and hydropower ltd. and others, the supreme court observed as under:"10. this court has referred to several documents on ..... error apparent on the face of the record for the purpose of order 47 rule 1 cpc or section 23(3)(f) of the act. to put it differently an order or decision or judgment cannot be corrected merely because it is erroneous in law or on the ground ..... order (oral):(application for review under rule 90 of the high court of chhattisgarh rules, 2007 read with order xlvii rule 1 of the code of civil procedure dated 08.09.2010 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2012 (TRI)

C.G. State Power Distribution Company Limited and Another Vs. Sanjay S ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... then such person, who avails or hire services for commercial purpose, is excluded from the aforesaid definition. of course, the explanation, which was also added by the same amending act 62 of 2002, w.e.f. 15-3-2003 further provides that if any person avails services exclusively for the purpose of earning livelihood by self employment, then the words ..... livelihood by means of selfemployment; 8. in the aforesaid definition under section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act, the words .but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose., have been inserted by amending act 62 of 2002 w.e.f. 15-3-2003. thus, prior to the insertion of the aforesaid words ..... commercial purpose inserted in section 2(1)(d)(ii) by the act 62 of 2002 is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of that case since the controversy relates to the period prior to amendment. 14. thus, the ratio of the aforesaid case is that supply of electricity is not sale and purchase of something, but it is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2012 (TRI)

C.G. State Power Distribution Company Limited Vs. Fattechand Bagdi

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... then such person, who avails or hire services for commercial purpose, is excluded from the aforesaid definition. of course, the explanation, which was also added by the same amending act 62 of 2002, w.e.f. 15-3-2003 further provides that if any person avails services exclusively for the purpose of earning livelihood by self employment, then the words ..... livelihood by means of selfemployment; 8. in the aforesaid definition under section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act, the words .but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose., have been inserted by amending act 62 of 2002 w.e.f. 15-3-2003. thus, prior to the insertion of the aforesaid words ..... commercial purpose inserted in section 2(1)(d)(ii) by the act 62 of 2002 is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of that case since the controversy relates to the period prior to amendment. 14. thus, the ratio of the aforesaid case is that supply of electricity is not sale and purchase of something, but it is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2005 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. R.K. Industries

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2005(3)ARBLR412(NULL)

..... , exceeds rs. 20 lacs, now after amendment by amendment act no. 62 of 2002, rs. 20 lacs have been increased by rs. 1 crore.service has been defined in the said act, 1986 which includes facilities in connection with, banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or ..... both entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information. deficiency, according to act ..... two calendar months after having been required so to do in writing by the other party in accordance with the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940, as amended from time to time and for the time being in force. in case either party shall refuse or fail to appoint arbitrator within .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... said firm is engaged in sales and service of cold storages, iceplants equipments, commission and erection services for cold storage. the complainant is proprietor of chhattisgarh electrical and engineering works. earlier also the complainant had purchased jcb machine. it appears that the complainant purchased the jcb machine for commercial purpose and the complainant ..... be decided only after appreciation of the material provided by the parties. he placed reliance on kurji holy family hospital v. boehringer mannheim india ltd. and anr., iii (2007) cpj 371 (nc); bhanwar kanwar v. r.k. gupta and anr. (dr.), 2009 ncj 675 (nc); cci chambers co-op. hsg. society ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2016 (HC)

Sadhna Bai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Revenue a ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... 2014 government is justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of the affected/displaced family from consideration for employment under the chhattisgarh state model rehabilitation policy, 2007, as amended, on the ground of her marriage. 2. the above-stated question of law arises for consideration in the following factual matrix of the ..... the state government in exercise of power conferred under article 162 of the constitution of india has framed the chhattisgarh state model rehabilitation policy, 2007 (as amended) to restore the status and dignity of land oustee whose land has been subjected to acquisition for the projects of governmental and private ..... of the provisions contained in the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short 'the la act') for dumping ash products oozing out from the power unit owned by respondent no.2 chhattisgarh state electricity production company limited and ultimately, award was passed on 29-8- 2007 and thereafter, lands vested with the state government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2003 (HC)

Raymond Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2004Chh12; 2004(1)MPHT33(CG)

..... the case, and refers it for the decision of the chief controlling revenue authority for its decision/opinion. even under section 56(4) of the stamp act as amended (m.p. amendment) act, 1990 w.e.f. 21st january, 1991 no revision or appeal is available. while passing the impugned order the board of revenue failed to appreciate ..... stamp.25. now coming to the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that if we compare the provisions of the m.p. amendment act with the provisions of the maharashtra stamp act in which section 53a, a clear provision has been made for filing a revision against the decision of the collector but such provision has ..... the state of madhya pradesh and central government from the date it commenced operations by payment of sales tax, stamp duty, excise, royalty and cess on limestone, electricity charges etc.3. the petitioners further mentioned that they also actively contributed for development of the area where they established the cement division and it's around area .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //