Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Court: chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc raipur Page 1 of about 7 results (2.812 seconds)

Mar 06 2012 (TRI)

C.G. State Power Distribution Company Limited Vs. Fattechand Bagdi

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... then such person, who avails or hire services for commercial purpose, is excluded from the aforesaid definition. of course, the explanation, which was also added by the same amending act 62 of 2002, w.e.f. 15-3-2003 further provides that if any person avails services exclusively for the purpose of earning livelihood by self employment, then the words ..... livelihood by means of selfemployment; 8. in the aforesaid definition under section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act, the words .but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose., have been inserted by amending act 62 of 2002 w.e.f. 15-3-2003. thus, prior to the insertion of the aforesaid words ..... commercial purpose inserted in section 2(1)(d)(ii) by the act 62 of 2002 is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of that case since the controversy relates to the period prior to amendment. 14. thus, the ratio of the aforesaid case is that supply of electricity is not sale and purchase of something, but it is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2012 (TRI)

C.G. State Power Distribution Company Limited and Another Vs. Sanjay S ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... then such person, who avails or hire services for commercial purpose, is excluded from the aforesaid definition. of course, the explanation, which was also added by the same amending act 62 of 2002, w.e.f. 15-3-2003 further provides that if any person avails services exclusively for the purpose of earning livelihood by self employment, then the words ..... livelihood by means of selfemployment; 8. in the aforesaid definition under section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act, the words .but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose., have been inserted by amending act 62 of 2002 w.e.f. 15-3-2003. thus, prior to the insertion of the aforesaid words ..... commercial purpose inserted in section 2(1)(d)(ii) by the act 62 of 2002 is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of that case since the controversy relates to the period prior to amendment. 14. thus, the ratio of the aforesaid case is that supply of electricity is not sale and purchase of something, but it is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a ..... said firm is engaged in sales and service of cold storages, iceplants equipments, commission and erection services for cold storage. the complainant is proprietor of chhattisgarh electrical and engineering works. earlier also the complainant had purchased jcb machine. it appears that the complainant purchased the jcb machine for commercial purpose and the complainant ..... be decided only after appreciation of the material provided by the parties. he placed reliance on kurji holy family hospital v. boehringer mannheim india ltd. and anr., iii (2007) cpj 371 (nc); bhanwar kanwar v. r.k. gupta and anr. (dr.), 2009 ncj 675 (nc); cci chambers co-op. hsg. society ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2014 (TRI)

Mohammad Momid Khan Vs. Magma Leasing Limited, Through: Managing Direc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... to obviate any confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who buys ..... of tyre centre, bilaspur dated 24.06.2011, cash/credit memo dated 23.06.2011 of uttara body works, cash / credit memo dated 24.06.2011 of ansari auto electricals, bilaspur (c.g.), quotation dated 24.06.2011 of sandeep automobiles, bilaspur, photographs of the jcb machine. 9. the respondents/ops have also filed documents i.e. hire ..... batta, j) was a party has after scrutiny of a large number of judgments, which actually pertain to the pre-amendment period i.e. before 15.3.2003, in meera industries v. modern constructions, r.p. no.1765 of 2007 decided on 22.5.2009, wherein it was held : in view of the above, we are of the opinion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vandana Global Limited Vs. M/S. Jaypee Engg. and Hydraulics Equipment ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... view to obviate any confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who buys ..... of the opinion that the appellants are not consumer under section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act. thereby the complaint would not lie under section 21 of the act." 9. in kurji holy family hospital v. boehringer mannheim india ltd. and ors., iii (2007) cpj 371 (nc), the hon'ble national commission observed thus : "23. dealing with the ..... batta, j) was a party has after scrutiny of a large number of judgments, which actually pertain to the pre-amendment period i.e. before 15.3.2003, in meera industries v. modern constructions, r.p. no.1765 of 2007 decided on 22.5.2009, wherein it was held : in view of the above, we are of the opinion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2014 (TRI)

Srei. Equipment Finance Private Limited, Through : Manager Vs. Ibrahim ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... obviate any confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who ..... j) was a party has after scrutiny of a large number of judgments, which actually pertain to the pre-amendment period i.e. before 15.3.2003, in meera industries v. modern constructions, r.p. no.1765 of 2007 decided on 22.5.2009, wherein it was held : in view of the above, we are of the ..... obviate any confusion the expression large scale is not a very precise expression parliament stepped in and added the explanation to section 2(1)(d) by ordinance / amendment act, 1993. the explanation excludes certain purposes from the purview of the expression commercial purpose a case of exception to an exception. let us elaborate : a person who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2014 (TRI)

Magma Finance Corporation Limited, and Others Vs. Jugal Kishore Singh ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... 06.2010 and filed written version. in the written version in first instance there is no averment regarding the arbitration proceedings and ops / magma finance corporation limited amended their pleadings in the written statement and thereby pleaded regarding the arbitration award. the ops have filed copy of award dated 29.06.2010, passed by mr. ..... or by using muscle power and committed deficiency in service. 17. in the case of instalment supply ltd. vs. kangra ex-serviceman transport co. and anr., i (2007) cpj 34 (nc), hon'ble national commission, has observed thus :- "3. dissatisfied with the order of state commission, the petitioner has filed the revision. it was ..... section 9 of the code of civil procedure, i.e., to avail of right of civil action in a competent court of civil jurisdiction. nonetheless, the act provides the additional remedy. it would, therefore, be clear that the legislature intended to provide a remedy in addition to the consentient arbitration which could be enforced .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //