Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... jurisdiction, as the provisions of section 24(3)(b) and section 27 of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000 are not attracted in the present case, has also been made. by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order ..... meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 residential/commercial complex at plot no. 11 at harmu, ..... the respondent board for removing the encroachment and handing over the possession. the executive engineer, housing board requested the deputy collection, dhanbad on 08.09.2007 to deputy magistrate and provide sufficient policy force for removing encroachment. the housing board issued show cause notice dated 24.12.2010 directing the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... a work population of 75,000/- depend directly or indirectly. the petitioner claims to contribute substantially towards statutory payment such as royalty, welfare cess, sales tax, excise, electricity duty etc. to the central as well as the state government. in the financial year 2013-14, the petitioner claims to have paid rs. 288 crores as royalty ..... the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is earliest. however, amended rule provided that this shall not apply to renewal under sub section (3) of section 8 of the mmdr act, 1957. further amendments were brought in rule 9 of the said rules. the state government through its letter dated 20. ..... and regulatory requirements. the petitioner claims to have obtained forest clearance earlier for 346.49 hectares on 23.04.1999 and for 24.43 hectares on 07.11.2007. however, in terms of requirement of forest guidelines 2004 clause 4.16, the petitioner also made an application for fresh forest clearance in form 'b' under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... with criminal antecedent ineligible, to conclude that antecedents of moral turpitude however grave, can be overlooked, does not stand to reason. in delhi development authority & anr. vs. uee electricals engineering (p) ltd. & anr. , reported in (2004) 11 scc 213, one of the directors of the company assaulted the assistant engineer of dda and caused injury ..... as, it has not disclosed the pendency of criminal cases against it. it is to be noticed that the petitioner, though has filed rejoinder affidavits and application seeking amendment, it has not either averred or produced the copies of first information report of the cases filed against it. in s.p. chengalwaraya naidu (dead) by lrs. ..... , there is no challenge to those conditions. 18. referring to section 42 of the excise act and rule 53 of the rules contained in notification dated 15.01.1919 and rule 9 (iv) of bihar excise rules of 2007, it is submitted that 20 the legislative intent reflected in the above provisions clearly indicates that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... accordance with provisions of national council for teacher education (guidelines for regulations of tuition fees and other fees chargeable by unaided teacher education institutions) regulations, 2002, as amended from time to time and shall not charge donations, capitation fee etc from the students. 4. staff (i) academic (i) number (for a basic unit ..... is further submitted that till 2003 there were only 2 private colleges and the number of b.ed colleges increased to 8 between the period 2003 2007. however, it swelled to 31 in the academic year 2012 13 and the individual colleges have not challenged clause 10 of the resolution dated 20. ..... not confined only to fixing norms and standards of teacher education and procedure for recognition of institutions, commencement of new programmes etc. rather, the ncte act encompasses all matters connected to teacher education.19. the various provisions in the national council for teacher education (recognition norms and procedure) regulations, 2009 clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... is a minor mineral within the meaning of the expression in section 3(e) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957.12. the state of jharkhand vide notification dated 27.12.2010 amended schedule ii whereby, the royalty for ordinary clay clay used for manufacturing of raniganj tiles and commercial use was fixed at the ..... petitioners states that the decision in hindustan steel works construction ltd. has been affirmed by the hon ble supreme court in slp (c) no(s). 16330 16333/2007.6. the question which arises for consideration is, whether in view of the notification dated 03.02.2000 issued by the ministry of mines, government of india ..... cannot be collected from the petitioners. the learned counsel for the petitioners relied on decisions in hindustan steel works construction ltd. vs. state of bihar and ors. , reported in (2007) 2 pljr 849, banarasi das chadha and brothers vs. lt. governor, delhi adminstration and ors. (1978) 4 scc 11 and som datt builders ltd. vs. union of .....
Tag this Judgment!