Skip to content


Ms Raus Scl Jv Through Its Authorized Signatory K P Naidu Vs. East Central Railways Represented Through Chief Administrative officer and Ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided On
AppellantMs Raus Scl Jv Through Its Authorized Signatory K P Naidu
RespondentEast Central Railways Represented Through Chief Administrative officer and Ors
Excerpt:
1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 4737 of 2014 m/s   raus­scl   (jv)   a   joint   venture   firm   through   its   authorized  signatory k.p. naidu, son of k. janardhana naidu having its office  at haria mod, chandwa, p.o. & p.s.­ chandwa, district­ latehar  (jharkhand) ... … petitioner  versus 1.   east   central   railways,   having   its   headquarter   at   hazipur,  district   hazipur,   bihar   represented   through   chief   administrative  officer having its office at hazipur, district hazipur, bihar  2.   chief   administrative   officer   (construction),   east   central  organization (construction  organization), east central railways, .....
Judgment:

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4737 of 2014 M/s   RAUS­SCL   (JV)   a   joint   venture   firm   through   its   authorized  signatory K.P. Naidu, son of K. Janardhana Naidu having its office  at Haria Mod, Chandwa, P.O. & P.S.­ Chandwa, District­ Latehar  (Jharkhand) ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 1596 of 2013 Bhardwaj   Construction   Company   Pvt.   Ltd.,   having   its   registered  office at 25C, Road No. 1, Ashok Nagar, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002  through   one   of   its   Director   Shri   Jai   Durga   Pathak,   son   of   late  Lambodar   Pathak,   Resident   of   25C,   Road   No.   1,   Ashok   Nagar,  Ranchi, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   Headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District Hazipur, Bihar 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 2 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Mines,  Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­  Doranda, District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Koderma,  District­ Koderma 6.   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribagh,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­  Hazaribagh ... … Respondents  with  W.P.(C) No. 1602 of 2013 Bkb   Transport   (P)   Ltd.,   a   company   registered   under   the   Indian  Companies Act, having its office at New Road, P.O. Phusro Bazar,  District­ Bokaro  through Saurabh Kumar Agarwal,  son of Madan  Mohan   Agarwal,   Resident   of   New   Road,   P.O.   Phusro   Bazar,  District­ Bokaro ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   Headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District Hazipur, Bihar 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Railways (Construction Organization), Mahendru Ghat, First Floor,  Patna  3. Chief Engineer (Construction), East Central Railways, Mahendru  Ghat, Patna  4. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Mines,  Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­  Doranda, District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Koderma,  District­ Koderma 6.   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribagh,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­  Hazaribagh ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 1603 of 2013 Saurabh   Kumar   and   Brothers,   a   Partnership   concern   having   its  office at and P.O. Jaridih Bazar P.S. Gandhi Nagar, District­ Bokaro  3 through   one   of   its   partner   Saurabh   Kumar   Agarwal,   son   of   Sri  Madan   Mohan   Agarwal,   Resident   of   at   and   P.O.   Jaridih   Bazar,  District­ Bokaro ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   Headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District Hazipur, Bihar 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Railways (Construction Organization), Mahendru Ghat, First Floor,  Patna  3. Chief Engineer (Construction), East Central Railways, Mahendru  Ghat, Patna  4. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Mines,  Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­  Doranda, District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Koderma,  District­ Koderma 6.   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribagh,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­  Hazaribagh ... … Respondents   with  W.P.(C) No. 1790 of 2013 M/s  Triveni Engicons Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the  Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 3/6, HS Tower,  L.   Road,   Bistupur,   Jamshedpur,   District­   Singhbhum   East,  Jharkhand   through   its   authorized   signatory   Shri   Subir   Kumar  Dutta, aged­ 63 years, son of Late Sudhir Chandra Dutta, Resident  of   –   Flat   No.   104,   Sabu   madhusudan   iketan,   Reversmeet   Road  (Near   Mouni   Baba   Temple),   Sonari,   P.O.   &   P.S.­   Sonari,  Jamshedpur, District­ Singhbhum East ... … Petitioner  Versus 1. South Eastern Railway, having its Headquarter at Garden Reach,  Kolkata 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   South   Eastern  Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   South,   South   Eastern   Railway,  Garden Reach, Kolkata  4 4. Chief Engineer (Construction II), South Eastern Railway, Garden  Reach, Kolkata  5. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of  Mines, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. &  P.S.­ Doranda, District, Ranchi 6.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Saraikella   Kharsawan,   District­  Saraikella Kharsawan 7. District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, P.O., P.S.­ Chaibasa, District­  Singhbhum West ... … Respondents   with  W.P.(C) No. 1795 of 2013 M/s  Triveni Engicons Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the  Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 3/6, HS Tower,  L.   Road,   Bistupur,   Jamshedpur,   District­   Singhbhum   East,  Jharkhand   through   its   authorized   signatory   Shri   Subir   Kumar  Dutta, aged­ 63 years, son of Late Sudhir Chandra Dutta, Resident  of   –   Flat   No.   104,   Sabu   madhusudan   iketan,   Reversmeet   Road  (Near   Mouni   Baba   Temple),   Sonari,   P.O.   &   P.S.­   Sonari,  Jamshedpur, District­ Singhbhum East ... … Petitioner     Versus 1. South Eastern Railway, having its Headquarter at Garden Reach,  Kolkata 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   South   Eastern  Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   South,   South   Eastern   Railway,  Garden Reach, Kolkata  4. Chief Engineer (Construction II), South Eastern Railway, Garden  Reach, Kolkata  5. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of  Mines, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. &  P.S.­ Doranda, District, Ranchi 6.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Saraikella   Kharsawan,   District­  Saraikella Kharsawan 7. District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, P.O., P.S.­ Chaibasa, District­  Singhbhum West ... … Respondents 5 with  W.P.(C) No. 1860 of 2013 Jaishiv   Constructions   Pvt.   Ltd.,   having   its   office   at   Bano   Manzil  Road, Ranchi through one of its Director, Y.N. Singh, son of Late  J.P.   Singh,   Resident  of Bano  Manzil Road,  Ranchi,  P.O.­  G.P.O.,  P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District­ Ranchi ... … Petitioner  Versus 1. East Central Railway, having its Headquarter at Hazipur, District  Patna, Bihar 2. Chief Administrative Officer (Construction), East Central Central  Railways, Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, Patna 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   Central,   East   Central   Railway,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, Patna, Bihar  4. South Eastern Railway, having its Headquarter at Garden Reach,  Kolkata 5.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   South   Eastern  Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata 6.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   South,   South   Eastern   Railway,  Garden Reach, Kolkata  7. Chief Engineer (Construction II), South Eastern Railway, Garden  Reach, Kolkata  8. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of  Mines, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. &  P.S.­ Doranda, District, Ranchi 9.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Chaibasa,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­ Chaibasa 10. The District Mining Officer, P.O., P.S. & District­ Hazaribagh 11. The District Mining Officer, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 4566 of 2013 M/s Royal Infraconstru Ltd. having its office at 18, R.N. Mukherjee  Road, 6th Floor, Kolkata, P.O. & P.S. Kolkata, represented through  6 its Project Manager, Pintu Banerjee, S/o Shambhu Nath Banerjee,  R/o 20/11, Rana Pratap Road, A­Zone, Durgapur, Burdwan, P.O.­  Ashoke Avenue, P.S.­ Aurobindo Thana, District­ Burdwan (W.B.),  Pin­ 713204 ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   Headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Koderma,  District­ Koderma 6.   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribagh,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­  Hazaribagh ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 4569 of 2013 M/s Royal Infraconstru Ltd. having its office at 18, R.N. Mukherjee  Road, 6th Floor Kolkatta PO PS Kolkatta represented through its  Project Manager Pintu Banerjee, S/o Shambhu Nath Banerjee R/o  20/11, Ranapratap Road, A­Zone, Durgapur, Burdwan, Pin­713204  PO Ashoke Avenue, PS Aurobindo Thana Distt.­ Burdwan (W.B.)   ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   head   quarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 7 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5. The District Mining Officer, Giridih, P.O., P.S. Giridih, District­  Giridih 6.   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribagh,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   District­  Hazaribagh ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 2117 of 2014 M/s   MRKR   Pallavi­   Upkar   JV   a   joint   venture   firm   through   its  authorized   signatory   M.   Vasudeva   Reddy,   son   of   Sathi   Reddy  having  its  office   at   6­3­347/22/10/2,  101,  Sai Villa  Apartments,  Dwarkapuri Colony, Panjagutta, P.O. & P.S.­ Erra Manzi, District­  Hyderabad ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Mahendru Ghat, P.O. & P.S.­ Bankipore,  District­ Patna, Bihar 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Latehar,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar   ... … Respondents 8 with  W.P.(C) No. 2127 of 2014 M/s   MRKR   Pallavi­   Upkar   JV     through   its   authorized   signatory  M. Vasudeva Reddy, son of Sathi Reddy having its office at 6­3­ 347/22/10/2,   101,   Sai   Villa   Apartments,   Dwarkapuri   Colony,  Panjagutta, P.O. & P.S.­ Erra Manzi, District­ Hyderabad ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   head   quarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District­ Hazipur, Bihar 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Latehar,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar    ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 2138 of 2014 M/s MRKR Pallavi­ Upkar JV through its authorized signatory M.  Vasudeva   Reddy,   son   of   Sathi   Reddy   having   its   office   at   6­3­ 347/22/10/2,   101,   Sai   Villa   Apartments,   Dwarkapuri   Colony,  Panjagutta, P.O. & P.S.­ Erra Manzi, District­ Hyderabad ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.       East   Central   Railways,   having   its   head   quarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer   having   its   office   at   Hazipur,   District­Hazipur   Bihar,  Mahendru Ghat, Patna, Dist. Patna, Bihar 9 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Latehar,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar    ...   … Respondents   with  W.P.(C) No. 2658 of 2014 M/s  Triveni Engicons Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the  Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 3/6, HS  Tower, L. Road, Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District­ Singhbhum East,  Jharkhand through its authorized signatory Shri UTTAM KUMAR  MALLICK,   aged­   56   years,   son   of   Late   Sudhir   Kumar   Mallick,  Resident   of   –   Flat   No.  K/F6,  Kantilal  Gandhi  Memorial   Hospital  Campus,   SouthPark,   P.O.  &  P.S.­   Bistupur,  Jamshedpur,  District­  East Singhbhum  (Jharkhand)   ... … Petitioner  Versus 1. South Eastern Railway, having its Headquarter at Garden Reach,  Kolkata 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   South   Eastern  Railway, Garden Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   South,   South   Eastern   Railway,  Garden Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 4. Chief Engineer (Construction II), South Eastern Railway, Garden  Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 5. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of  Mines, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. &  P.S.­ Doranda, District, Ranchi 10 6. The District Mining Officer, PO, PS & Dist. Saraikella Kharsawan,  District­  Saraikella Kharsawan 7. District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, P.O., P.S.­ Chaibasa, District­  Singhbhum West    ...   … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 2687 of 2014 M/s  Triveni Engicons Pvt. Ltd., a Company registered under the  Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 3/6, HS  Tower, L. Road, Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District­ Singhbhum East,  Jharkhand through its authorized signatory Shri UTTAM KUMAR  MALLICK,   aged­   56   years,   son   of   Late   Sudhir   Kumar   Mallick,  Resident   of   –   Flat   No.  K/F6,  Kantilal  Gandhi  Memorial   Hospital  Campus,   SouthPark,   P.O.  &  P.S.­   Bistupur,  Jamshedpur,  District­  East Singhbhum  (Jharkhand)   ... … Petitioner  Versus 1. South Eastern Railway, having its Headquarter at Garden Reach,  PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   South   Eastern  Railway, Garden Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction)   South,   South   Eastern   Railway,  Garden Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 4. Chief Engineer (Construction II), South Eastern Railway, Garden  Reach, PO, PS & Dist. Kolkata 5. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of  Mines, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. &  P.S.­ Doranda, District, Ranchi 6. The District Mining Officer, PO, PS & Dist. Saraikella Kharsawan,  District­  Saraikella Kharsawan 7. District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, P.O., P.S.­ Chaibasa, District­  Singhbhum West    ...   … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 5244 of 2014 M/s   RSR   Infra­JGB   (JV)   through   its   Authorized   Signatory   K.  Sathyanarayana Raju son of late K.D. Raju having its office at 1st  11 Floor, B­Sahu Complex Murpa More Balamath PO & PS Balamath  Dist. Latehar ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   Headquarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar  ... … Respondents   with  W.P.(C) No. 395 of 2015 M/s   RAUS­IGS   (JV)   a   joint   venture   firm   through   its   authorized  Signatory K. P. Naidu son of K. Janardhana Naidu having its office  at   Haria   Mod,   Chandwa,   PO   &   PS   Chandwa,   Dist.   Latehar  (Jharkhand)   ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   head   quarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  12 4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Koderma,   P.O.   &   P.S.,   Latehar,  District­ Latehar 6. District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District­ Latehar  ... … Respondents with  W.P.(C) No. 1096 of 2015 M/s   Kashi   Construction   a   partnership   firm   through   its   partner  Kamal   Kant   Singh   son   Late   Triveni   Prasad   Singh   resident   of  Village­Mehdhai   PO   Bhagwanpur   PS  Bhagwanpur   Dist   Begusarai  Bihar   ... … Petitioner  Versus 1.   East   Central   Railways,   having   its   head   quarter   at   Hazipur,  District   Hazipur,   Bihar   represented   through   Chief   Administrative  Officer having its office at Hazipur, District Hazipur, Bihar  2.   Chief   Administrative   Officer   (Construction),   East   Central  Organization (Construction  Organization), East Central Railways,  Mahendru Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar 3.   Chief   Engineer   (Construction),   East   Central   Organization  (Construction   Organization),   East   Central   Railways,   Mahendru  Ghat, First Floor, P.O., P.S. & District­ Patna, Bihar  4.   The   State   of   Jharkhand   through   Secretary,   Mines,   Govt.   of  Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.­ Doranda,  District, Ranchi 5.   The   District   Mining   Officer,   Hazaribag,   P.O.,   P.S.   &   Dist.­  Latehar ... … Respondents ­­­­­ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ­­­­­ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate   Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate   Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate   Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, Advocate 13   Mr. Piyush Chitresh, Advocate   Mr. Shadab bin Haque For Respondent­State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G.   Mr. Rajesh Kumar, G.P. V   Mr. Saket Upadhyay, J.C. to A.A.G. For Respondent­Rlys. : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.S.C. (Rlys.)   Mr. S.K. Lala, Advocate ­­­­­ Order No. 06 Dated: 25.03.2015     Aggrieved   by   deduction   from   their   running   Account  Bills on account of royalty for “ordinary earth used for filling or  leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways,  building”,   batch   of   writ   petitions   has   been   filed   seeking   a  declaration   that   until  and  unless,  Scheduled­II  to   the  Jharkhand  Minor   Mineral   Concession   Rules,   2004   is   amended   and   rate   of  royalty for “ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in  construction of embankment, roads, railways, building” is fixed, no  royalty   for   the   same   is   payable   to   the   State   of   Jharkhand.     A  common question of law has been raised in all the writ petitions  and prayer in all the writ petitions are almost identical.  Therefore,  it is not necessary to discuss, in detail, facts of each case separately  and, suffice would be to notice facts of any one case.  The nature of  work carried by the writ petitioners is noticed below: Sl. No. Writ name and no. Agreement details 1. WPC   No.   4737/14­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s. RAUS­SCL (JV) blanketing,   turfing   between   24  Km   to   28   Km   in   New   BG   line  between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  14 District 2. WPC   No.   1596/13­  Construction   of   Major   Bridges  Bhardwaj  between   Koderma   and  Construction  Hazaribagh   in   connection   with  Company Pvt. Ltd. construction   of   new   BG   Railway  line between Koderma and Ranchi 3. WPC   No.   1602/13­ Work   of   ECR   for   construction   of  BKB   Transport   (P)  Minor Bridges alongwith RUB etc.  Ltd. in Koderma­Giridih Section 4. WPC   No.   1603/13­ Work   of   construction   of   10.00  Saurav   Kumar   and  span road over bridges in between  Bros. Koderma and Ranchi 5. WPC   No.   1790/13­  Earth   Work,   construction   of  M/s. Triveni Engicons  bridges,   blanketing   etc.   in  Pvt. Ltd. connection   with   the   Third   Line  between Km 265 to SINI (Sec­II)  in   SINI   Yard   Chakardharpur  Division 6. WPC   No.   1795/13­  Execution   of   Blanketing   minor  M/s. Triveni Engicons  bridges   in   Kharsawan  Pvt. Ltd. Dongoaposhi 3rd line between Km  327   to   Km   345   (Sec­III)   in  Chakardharpur Division 7 WPC   No.   1860/13­  Execution   of   railway   formation  Jaishiv   Constructions  work by earthwork in cutting and  Pvt. Ltd. embankment   etc.   in   Sec­II   from  Km   370   to   Km   377   including  Padapahar   yard   in   connection  with   the   doubling   work   of  Banspani­Padapahar  (Chakardharpur Division) 8 WPC   No.   4566/13­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling,  M/s.   Royal  blanketing, construction of Minor  15 Infraconstru Ltd. &   Major   bridges   etc.   between  49.50   KM   to   56.4   KM   from  Koderma to Tillaya 9 WPC   No.   4569/13­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s.   Royal  blanketing, construction of Major  Infraconstru Ltd.  bridges   at   49.55   Km,   at   Km  50.099,   at   Km   56.875,   at   Km  82.114, at Km 87.44 and at 90.57  in connection with construction of  new   BG   line   between   Koderma  and Giridih 10 WPC   No.   2117/14­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s.   MRKR   Pallavi­  blanketing,   turfing   between   11.5  Upkar JV Km   to   16   Km   in   New   BG   line  Between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  District  11 WPC   No.   2127/14­ Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s.   MRKR   Pallavi­  blanketing,   turfing   between   16  Upkar JV Km   to   19   Km   in   New   BG   line  Between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  District 12 WPC   No.   2138/14­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s.   MRKR   Pallavi­  blanketing,   turfing   between   19  Upkar JV Km   to   22   Km   in   New   BG   line  Between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  District 13 WPC   No.   2658/14­  Execution   of   railway   formation  M/s. Triveni Engicons  work   by   earthwork   etc.   in  Pvt. Ltd. connection   with   the   Third   Line  between   Adityapur   to   Km   265  (Sec­I) including yard remodeling  works in Adityapur & Gamhariya  yard (Chakardharpur Division) 16 14 WPC   No.   2687/14­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s. Triveni Engicons  blanketing, turfing for the Section  Pvt. Ltd. IV   Km   345   to   Dongoaposhi   in  Chakardharpur Division   15 WPC   No.   5244/14­ Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s.   RSR   Infra­JGB  blanketing,   turfing   between   22  (JV) Km   to   24   Km   in   New   BG   line  Between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  District 16 WPC   No.   395/15­  Earth   work   in   cutting,   filling  M/s RAUS­IGS (JV) blanketing,   turfing   between   28  Km   to   33   Km   in   New   BG   line  Between Tori Shivpuri in Latehar  District 17 WPC   No.   1096/15­  Construction   of   loading   wharf,  M/s.   Kashi  approach road and other ancillary  Construction works   at   Banadag   in   connection  with   construction   of   Hazaribag­ Banadag Railway Siding for NTPC W.P.(C) No. 2117 of 2014 2.  The   petitioner   is   a   registered   contractor   under   the  railways and with the Government of Jharkhand and it is engaged  in construction work and other allied activities.  The petitioner was  awarded  the  work   for “earth work  in  cutting, filling, blanketing,  drafting,   construction   of   minor   bridges,   major   bridges   and   other  ancillary work between 11.5 Km and 16 Km” in connection with  construction of new business line between Tori­Shivpuri in Latehar  district.  The aforesaid work involves extensive use of earth work in  17 leveling purposes, for construction of embankment for railways etc.  The petitioner procures ordinary earth from local agriculturists and  land holders in and around the area of construction.  No lincese has  been granted by the State of Jharkhand for mining of the ordinary  earth.     The   South   Eastern   Railways   deducts   lump­sum   payment  from contractors’ bill for those contractors, who are not submitting  M and N Forms for earth work and the said amount is paid to the  State Government on account of royalty for earth work.  It is stated  that the Assistant Mining Officer, Hazaribagh issued letters to the  petitioner­Company for disclosing the quantity of minor minerals  used   in   construction.     The   Mines   Inspector   inspected   the   work  carried by the petitioner under contract and he furnished details of  bricks,   sand,   metal   boulder,   ordinary   earth   etc.   used   in   the  construction and accordingly, letter dated 17.03.2011 directing the  petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.5,66,400/­ was issued.    3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in  exercise  of powers conferred under Section 15 of the Mines and  Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the then State  of Bihar issued notification dated 28.09.1994 whereunder, royalty  for Ordinary Clay used in manufacturing of Raniganj tiles and used  for commercial purposes, was fixed @ Rs.15 per cubic mtr.  In the  Notification dated 28.09.1994 under Sl. No.3(ii), it is indicated that  no royalty would be charged for “Ordinary Clay” used for any other  purposes.  The Government of Jharkhand framed Jharkhand Minor  18 Mineral   Concession   Rules,   2004   and   adopted   Notification   dated  28.09.1994   of   the   State  of   Bihar   however,   after   the   Notification  dated   03.02.2000   was   issued   by   the   Government   of   India,   the  Government of Bihar though amended the Schedule by providing  rate   of   royalty   for   “ordinary   earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling  purposes   in   construction   of   embankment,   roads,   railways,  building”,   the   Government   of   Jharkhand   did   not   amend   Second  Schedule to the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004  and therefore, royalty for “ordinary earth” which has been declared  a minor minerals by the Notification dated 03.02.2000, cannot be  collected   from   the   petitioners.     The   learned   counsel   for   the  petitioners   relied   on   decisions   in  “Hindustan   Steel   Works   Construction Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.”, reported in (2007) 2   PLJR   849,  “Banarasi   Das   Chadha   and   Brothers   Vs.   Lt.   Governor,   Delhi   Adminstration   and   Ors.”  (1978)   4   SCC   11  and  “Som   Datt   Builders Ltd. Vs. Union of India” (2010) 1 SCC 311.

4. As against the above, Mr. Ajit Kumar, the learned AAG  submits   that   the   expression   used   in   the   Notification   of   the  Government   of   Jharkhand   is   “Sadharan   Mitti”   which   is   the  expression   used   in   the   Notification   dated   03.02.2000   of   the  Government   of   India   and   thus,   the   respondent­State   has   rightly  demanded   payment   of   royalty   for   ordinary   earth   used   by   the  petitioners   for   filling   or   leveling   purposes   in   construction   of  19 embankment, roads, railways, buildings etc.  It is further submitted  that the ordinary and natural meaning of the expression “Sadharan  Mitti” is “ordinary earth” and not “Ordinary Clay” and the English  version   of   the   Jharkhand   Notification   is   not   correct.     Trying   to  distinguish the judgment in “Hindustan Steel Works”, the learned  AAG submits that the said decision is not binding and this Court  can   interpret   the   expression   “Sadharan   Mitti”   once   again.     It   is  further   submitted   that   the   issue   involved   in   the   present   case   is  covered by the decision in “Som Datt Builders” case.

5. In reply, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, the learned counsel for the  petitioners   states   that   the   decision   in   “Hindustan   Steel   Works  Construction Ltd.” has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court  in SLP (c) No(s). 16330­16333/2007.

6. The   question   which   arises   for   consideration   is,  “whether in view of the notification dated 03.02.2000 issued by the  Ministry   of   Mines,   Government   of   India   declaring   the   “ordinary  earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling   purposes   in   construction   of  embankment,   roads,   railways,   buildings”,   a   minor   mineral   in  addition   to   the   minerals   already   declared   as   minor   minerals,   a  consequent amendment in the Second Schedule to the Jharkhand  Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 is necessary for fixing and  collecting royalty for the “ordinary earth” which has been declared  a minor minerals by the aforesaid notification?”

2. 7. Before considering the rival contentions, it is necessary  to   notice   the   relevant   provisions   in   the   Mines   and   Minerals  (Development   and   Regulation)   Act,   1957.     Section   2   of   the   Act  declares that the Union should take under its control the regulation  of   mines   and   development  of   minerals.     In   “Bharat   Coking   Coal  Limited Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.”, (1990) 4 SCC 557, the Hon'ble  Supreme   Court   has   held   that,   “By   Section   2   of   the   Act,   the  Parliament has declared that it is expedient in public interest that  the Union should take under its control the regulation of mines and  the development of minerals to the extent provided in the Act. In  view of the parliamentary declaration as made in Section 2 of the  Act,   the   State   Legislature   is   denuded   of   its   legislative   power   to  make   any   law   with   respect   to   the   regulation   of   mines   and   the  development of  minerals to the extent as provided by the Act”.  In  “P. Kannadasan Vs. State of T.N.”, (1996) 5 SCC 670, it has been  held   that,   levy   of   taxes/cesses   on   minerals   by   States   is   not  permissible.     The   denundation  of   the  States  is  not   partial.     It   is  total.  They cannot levy any tax or cess on minerals so long as the  declaration   of   Section   2   stands.     In   “State   of   W.B.   Vs.   Kesoram  Industries Ltd. & Ors.”, (2004) 10 SCC 201, a Constitution Bench of  the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that, “the effect is that no  State   Legislature   shall   have   power   to   enact   any   legislation  touching:   (i)   the   regulation   of   mines,   (ii)   the   development   of  minerals, and (iii) to the extent provided by Act 67 of 1957”.    21 8. Section   15   of   the   Act   confers   power   on   the   State  Governments   to   make   rules   in   respect   of   minor   minerals.     In  exercise   of   power   under   Section   15   of   the   Act,   the   State  Government   can   make   rules   for   fixing   and   collection   of   rent,  royalty, fees, dead­rent, fines or other charges and the time within  which and the manner in which these are payable.  The expression  “Minor Mineral” has been defined in Section 3(e) to mean building  stone, gravel, ordinary clay, ordinary sand other than sand used for  prescribed purposes.  Section 3(e) further provides that the Central  Government   may,   by   notification   in   official   gazette   declare   “any  other mineral”, to be a minor mineral.  Thus, the power to declare  any other mineral which is not included in the definition of minor  minerals in Section 3(e), is vested in the Central Government.  As  noticed   above,   vide   Notification   dated   03.02.2000,   the   Central  Government   declared   “ordinary   earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling  purposes   in   construction   of   embankment,   roads,   railways,  building”,   a   minor   mineral.     Thus,   in   exercise   of   powers   under  Section 15 of the Act the State Government is required to fix the  rate   of   royalty   for   “ordinary   earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling  purposes   in   construction   of   embankment,   roads,   railways,  building”.   The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended  that though the State of Bihar amended the Schedule, the State of  Jharkhand   which   adopted   Notification   dated   28.09.1994   of   the  State of Bihar, did not amend its Rules and therefore, royalty for  22 “ordinary   earth”   declared   as   a   minor   mineral   by   the   Central  Government   cannot   be   charged   by   the   State   of   Jharkhand.     Per  contra, the learned AAG contended that in view of the Notification  dated 03.02.2000 of the Central Government and the decision of  the   Hon’ble   Supreme   Court   in   “Som   Datt   Builders”   case,   the  respondent­State   has   rightly   issued   demand   letters   directing   the  petitioners to pay royalty for the “ordinary earth used by them for  filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads,  railways, building”.

9. In   the   counter­affidavit,   the   respondent­State   of  Jharkhand has stated that, “in exercise of the powers conferred by  Section   15   of   the   Mines   and   Minerals   (Development   and  Regulation)   Act,   1957,   the   State   Government   of   Jharkhand  published Notification No.2332/M dated 27.12.2010 (Annexure­6  of   the   writ   application)   amending   the   Schedule­2   of   the   JMMC  Rules, 2004 whereby and whereunder, at Serial No.5, the rate of  charging   royalty   for   use   of   Ordinary   Clay­   clay   used   for  manufacturing of Raniganj tiles and its commercial use, was fixed  @ Rs.24.00 per cubic metre. Prior to this Notification, the rate of  charging royalty on Ordinary Clay was @ 15.00 per cubic mtr.”.  It  is further stated that the Notification dated 03.02.2000 is binding  on the State Government and the State Government is bound to  follow the provision wherein the definition of Ordinary Clay also  brings ordinary earth under its purview i.e., Ordinary Clay includes  23 ordinary earth if the ordinary earth is being used for commercial  purposes.   It is contended that, since the use of ordinary earth by  the petitioners is for commercial purposes, the petitioners cannot  evade payment of royalty at the rate of Rs.24 per cubic mtr.

10. In Som Datt Builders case, the State of U.P. in exercise  of   powers   under   Section   15   of   the   Mines   and   Minerals  (Development   and   Regulation)   Act,   1957   framed   rules,   which  adopted   the   definition   of   minor   mineral.     It   appears   that   the  Government of U.P. issued Notification dated 20.03.2001 whereby,  the 1st Schedule appended to the 1963 Rules was amended and rate  of royalty for “ordinary clay”/”ordinary earth” was fixed at Rs.4 per  cubic mtr.  In Som Datt Builders case, the issue before the Hon’ble  Supreme   Court   was   whether,   “ordinary   earth   used   for   filling   or  leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways,  building”, is a minor mineral and the Hon’ble Supreme Court held  the   inclusion   of   “ordinary   earth”   as   a   minor   mineral,   valid.     In  Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., a Division Bench of Patna  High   Court   considered   the   expression   “Sadharan   Mitti”   and  “Ordinary Clay”.   The Court referred to dictionary meaning of the  word “Clay” in Chambers Dictionery, Oxford Dictionary, Standard  Dictionary of the Hindi language by Bhargava etc.  It has been held  that,  7.  “It is indisputable that both the Hindi and the English   versions   would   refer   to   one   and   the   same   thing.     It   is,   24 therefore,   apparent   that   the   Hindi   expression   'Sadharan   Mitti' was used to describe ordinary clay referred to in the   English version of the notification and that was included as   one of the minor minerals as defined in Section 3(e) of the   Act”.

11. The   Division   Bench   of   Patna   High   Court   finally   held  that, “royalty for ordinary earth can be charged after 18.04.2006,  when   the   State   Government   issued   notification   including   the  ordinary   earth   declared   vide   Notification   dated   03.02.2000,   a  minor mineral and fixed royalty for the same under Schedule II”.  In Banarasi Das Chadha, the issue was whether “brick earth” is a  minor mineral within the meaning of the expression in Section 3(e)  of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

12. The   State   of   Jharkhand   vide   Notification   dated  27.12.2010   amended   Schedule­II   whereby,   the   royalty   for  “Ordinary Clay­clay used for manufacturing of Raniganj tiles and  commercial use” was fixed at the rate of Rs.24 per cubic mtr.   By  the   said   amendment,   “ordinary   earth”   declared   vide   Notification  dated 03.02.2000 by the Central Government as a minor mineral  has not been incorporated in the 2nd Schedule and no rate of royalty  has been fixed by the State of Jharkhand for the “ordinary earth”  within the meaning of Notification dated 03.02.2000.   It is thus,  apparent   that   the   State   of   Jharkhand   can   collect   royalty   for  “Ordinary Clay” as appearing at Sl. No.5 in the 2 nd Schedule to the  Jharkhand   Minor   Mineral   Concession   Rules,   2004   and   not   for  25 “ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction  of embankment, roads, railways, building”.

13. In   the   writ   petition   the   petitioners   have   sought   a  declaration that “Ordinary Clay used for Raniganj tiles and other  commercial use” is different from “ordinary earth used for filling or  leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways,  building” and also for a declaration that without amending the 2 nd  Schedule to the  Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004,  no  royalty  can be  charged for “ordinary  earth used for filling or  leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways,  building”.     Vide   order   dated   28.07.2014,   the   petitioners   were  directed to make payment of royalty at the rate fixed for “Ordinary  Clay   used   for   manufacturing   Raniganj   tiles   and   commercial  purposes”.     The   respondent­State   has   pleaded   that   besides,   not  paying   royalty   for   “ordinary   earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling  purposes   in   construction   of   embankment,   roads,   railways,  building”, the petitioners have not paid royalty for other minerals  also.   Though, copies of demand notices have been produced on  record, it does not appear from the record that the petitioners have  made payment in compliance of order passed by this Court.   The  State of Jharkhand has raised objection stating that the petitioners  did   not   furnish   details   of   consumption   of   minor   minerals.     It   is  further stated that the petitioners are required to procure ordinary  earth   used   for   commercial   purposes   from   the   authorised   lease  26 holder/permit holder/dealer and permit in Form­G can be obtained  from the District Mining Officer however, the petitioners have not  applied for permit in order to avoid payment of royalty.  In view of  the fact that no prayer challenging the demand notice/notices has  been made in the writ petitions, I am not required to deal with the  aforesaid objections of the respondent­State.  From a reading of the  provisions   of   the   Mines   and   Minerals   (Development   and  Regulation) Act, 1957 and the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court  in “Som Datt Builders”, there cannot be a dispute that the State  Government has power to fix the rate of royalty for “ordinary earth  used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment,  roads, railways, building” and to enforce the payment of royalty for  the   same   however,   the   exercise   of   power  by   the   Government   of  Jharkhand under Section 15 of the Act fixing the rate of royalty for  a minor mineral must be reflected through a notification amending  2nd  Schedule   to   the   Jharkhand   Minor   Mineral   Concession   Rules,  2004.   Admittedly,  the State Government has not fix the rate of  royalty for “ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in  construction of embankment, roads, railways, building” and, it has  sought to recover royalty for the same contending that “Ordinary  Clay” would include “ordinary earth used for commercial purposes.  From the definition of “minor mineral” in Section 2(e) of the Act  and notification dated 03.02.2000 of the Central Government, it is  apparent   that   “Ordinary   Clay”   is   different   from   “ordinary   earth  27 used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment,  roads,   railways,   building”.     The   distinction   between   the   two   is  reflected in issuance of the said notification itself in as much as, the  Central   Government   has   issued   a   separate   notification   notifying  “ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction  of embankment, roads, railways, building”, a minor mineral.   The  distinction   is   further   clarified   in   view   of   decision   of   the   Hon'ble  Supreme   Court   in   “Banarasi   Das   Chadha”   wherein,  “brick   earth”  has  been   held   to  be  a minor  mineral.    Thus, it  is apparent  that  “ordinary earth” and “Ordinary Clay” have different uses and the  uses   of   “ordinary   earth”   in   a   particular   form   has   been   the  determinative factor whether it is a minor mineral or not.  In view  of   the   specific   prayer   made   in   the   writ   petitions,   it   is   hereby  declared   that   “Ordinary   Clay”   occurring   in   notification   dated  27.12.2010 of the State of Jharkhand is different from “ordinary  earth   used   for   filling   or   leveling   purposes   in   construction   of  embankment, roads,  railways, building” for which rate of royalty  has not been fixed by the Government of Jharkhand.  In the result,  the   respondent­State   of   Jharkhand   is   restrained   from   realising  royalty for “ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in  construction   of   embankment,   roads,   railways,   building”   without  amending   Second   Schedule   to   the   Jharkhand   Minor   Mineral  Concession Rules, 2004 and without prescribing rate of royalty for  the same.   28 14.  The   writ   petitions   are   allowed   in   the   above   terms.  Accordingly, I.A. No.3837 of 2014 (in W.P.(C) No.2117 of 2014),  which has been filed for the stay of deduction from running   and  final bills, also stands disposed of.   (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) R.K./A.F.R. 


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //