Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 21 amendment of section 181 Court: jharkhand Page 6 of about 145 results (0.158 seconds)

M/S Makers Casting India Priva Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court : Jharkhand

..... concerned state commission; (b) published in such manner so as to give adequate publicity for such charges and prices. from reading of section 45(2) of the electricity act, it is manifestly clear that a licensee (jseb) can charge only such amounts which were fixed by the state commission. it is relevant to mention that the jharkhand ..... petitioners.4. after hearing learned counsel for the parties, i have gone through the relevant laws and facts of the case. section 45 (1&2) of the electricity act runs as follows:- 45. power to recover charges.-(1) subject to the provisions of this section, the prices to be charged by a distribution licensee for the supply ..... with such modifications, alterations or such conditions as may be specified in that order. provided that the schedule of charges approved by the commission shall unless and otherwise amended or revoked, continue too be in force. 17.3 the existing schedule of charges of the distribution licensee shall continue to be in force until such time as .....

M/S T and T Metals Pvt.Ltd. Anci Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court : Jharkhand

..... learned ombudsman without disturbing the findings of the 'forum' that the board is not in a position to install prepayment meter as per the provisions of the act and the electricity supply code regulations, 2005, had directed the petitioner to deposit the security amount in 12 installments with interest. against that order, the present writ application filed ..... 046/- towards security amount for the financial year 2012-13. the said demand was also challenged in this case by filing an amendment petition vide interlocutory application no. 506 of 2015, and the said amendment allowed vide order dated 28.01.2015.5. sri d.k. pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per ..... section 47 (5) of the act, the respondents are not entitled to demand security amount in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of the act, if the consumer prepared .....

Sanjay Kumar Singh Alias Sanjay Singh Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... petitioner that there is non-compliance of section 126(3) of the electricity act, 2003 cannot be accepted. it is submitted that final assessment order passed under section 126 of the electricity act is appealable under section 127 of the electricity act, therefore, the amendment application filed by the petitioner by way of i.a. is not ..... the petitioner that once the petitioner has been acquitted from the charge under section 135 of the electricity act, it is not open for the jharkhand state electricity board to initiate proceeding under section 126 of the electricity act. he further submits that even if the board has power to initiate said proceeding, the same ..... 3452 of 2015 has been filed with a prayer to amend the main writ application because during the pendency of the writ application, the assessing authority issued final assessment order on 20.06.2014. admittedly, the aforesaid order is appealable under section 127 of the electricity act, 2003. under the said circumstance, in view of .....

Rajmahal Pahad Bachao Andolan Through President and ors. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR331(Jhr)]

..... pradip ghosh, learned senior advocate for the respondent no. 4, while .supporting mr. mukherjee's submissions, submitted that with the amendment of the coalmines (nationalisation) act, 1973 by the coalmines (nationalisation) amendment act, 1993 the central govt. had acquired a right to exploit coalmines for power generation amongst other objects. mr. ghosh submitted that ..... for local inhabitants who would also be re-settled by construction of new houses and arrangements of all facilities, including school, hospital, market place and electricity, so as to benefit the villagers. mr. mukherjee submitted that the government of india in its ministry of environment and forests had, by its letter ..... the union of india issued a notification specifying the supply of coal by panem coal mines limited for the thermal power plant of the punjab state electricity board.7. according to the writ petitioners, when the said news was published in the local newspapers in the month of april, 2002, there .....

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2763

..... in default of such deposit, the amount shall be recovered as an arrear of land revenue.7. in the year 1985, amendments were brought in section 13 of the aforesaid act. by virtue of said amendment act, the words appearing in clause (b) i.e. 'in bihar or in the course of inter-state trade or commerce' ..... of such manufactured goods is expected to exceed the quantum specified in sub-section (1) of section 3, or for mining or generation and distribution of electricity;and in respect of which the purchaser has been granted a certificate by the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner and for the prescribed period shall, unless ..... dealer required directly for use in mining, or to a person, company or undertaking holding registration certificate under the bihar electricity act, 1948 (bihar act xxxvi of 1948) required directly for use in the generations or distribution of electricity; and(d) sale of machineries, tools, plants and accessories thereof to a person, firm, company, corporation or .....

Damodar Valley Corporation and anr. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR371(Jhr)]

..... to the north of such straight line : provided that nothing in sub-clause (c) shall apply to any person who was, at the commencement of this act generating electrical energy at an installation having an aggregate capacity of more than 10,000 kilowatts, so long as the capacity of such installation is not increased : provided ..... of jharkhand. copies of relevant communications dated 10th may, 2002, 13th june, 2002 and 14th august, 2002 were also annexed thereto.14. on behalf of electricity board it was submitted that vij committee in its report reviewed the present arrangement regarding distribution of power within damodar valley area and recommended that in order to ..... was mentioned 'it was also clarified to the representative of jharkhand that vij committee's recommendation was not accepted and no order has been issued and the act had not been amended'.23. the director (thermal and coordination), ministry of power, government of india, by his letter dated 3.6.2002 (annexure 12/c) to the .....

Ms Ramgarh Refractory and Mineral Company Through One of Its Partners ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... dated 22.06.2009 for rs.3,95,591/-, which in view of the appellant was an order of provisional assessment under section 126 of the electricity act, 2003. subsequently, by an amendment, the assessment order passed subsequently on 30.07.2009, was also challenged by the appellant. the plea raised by the appellant before the writ court ..... , the provisions under part-xiv only are applicable and thus, it must be held that the provisional assessment order is under third proviso to section 135 of the electricity act, 2003.9. as noticed above, in cases of theft the special court has been given power and jurisdiction to assess the civil liability, finally. in the proceeding ..... during the pendency of the main writ petition, as one finds from para 2 of the impugned judgment, was wrongly labelled under section 126 of the electricity act, 2003 (for short the act of 2003) whereas, it is a case of theft in which a provisional assessment is made under third proviso to section 135. according to mr. .....

Beekay Steel Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004(1)BLJR767; [2004(1)JCR504(Jhr)]; [2005]141STC263(Jharkh)

..... not the competent authority as per the notification. application for prior permission was to be made before the aforesaid committee. the petitioner was not vigilant. if electric connection was not given to him after he applied for it in the year 1995, petitioner should have initiated appropriate proceedings in this regard before a court ..... position was known to the entrepreneurs. therefore, it appears that the pending applications also lapsed on the expiry of the policy on 31.8.2000. probably this amendment was introduced to save those units, who inspite of their best efforts were not in a position to start production before the expiry of the policy.'10. ..... poddar.whatever may be the reasons, the fact remains that the petitioner was not granted prior permission before the expiry of the policy, may be due to acts/omission on the part of the petitioner or the concerned authorities.11. ..........the said notifications were necessarily issued to carry out the industrial policy, 1995 and in .....

M/S.Zenith Forge Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court : Jharkhand

..... of 2001 ----- in the matter of an application under article 226 of the constitution of india. ------ m/s zenith forge ltd. industrial area, adityapur, jamshedpur petitioner versus jharkhand state electricity board & others ...................respondents ----- for the petitioner : m/s dhananjay pathak & sweta rani for the respondents : m/s ajit kumar, mukesh kr. sinha & saket upadhyay present: ..... in the manner prayed for. petitioner has further prayed for a declaration that the provision related to clause 16.2 of the tariff of 1983 and the amendment of 1994 is ultra vires. however the same is not pressed by the petitioner. the petitioner, consequently has once again prayed for rectification of the ..... kumar singh ----------- by court:- heard counsel for the parties.2. in para 1 of the writ application, petitioner states that the respondent- board, through their acts of omissions have raised a illegal demand of rs. 1,82,37,799.15p out of which a sum of rs. 17 lakhs on account of fuel surcharge .....

Tata Yodogawa Limited Through Its Company Secretary Sri Prashant Kumar ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... . no. 5347 of 2013 with i. a. no. 4096 of 2013 in l. p. a. no. 217 of 2013 tata yodogawa limited, jamshedpur appellant versus jharkhand state electricity board & others respondents coram : hon'ble the acting chief justice : hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar for the appellant : m/s. m. l. verma & m. s. mittal, senior advocate, shilpi john, advocate for ..... already been preferred seeking stay of the order passed by the learned single judge in the writ petition. moreover i. a. no. 5989 of 2013 has already been allowed for amendment. thus, we see no reason to entertain this interlocutory application for the prayers made in this application. 3 this is nothing but the repetition of one of the prayers made ..... ajit kumar, a.a.g. 05/dated: 10th september, 2013 per d.n. patel, a.c.j.i. a. no. 5989 of 2013:1. this application has been preferred for amendment in the memo of the letters patent appeal for the reason that after the impugned judgment dated 2nd may 2013 in c.w.j.c. no. 852 of 2000 (r .....