Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 17 amendment of section 153 Court: chennai Page 8 of about 1,423 results (0.164 seconds)

The Corporation of Madras Vs. the Madras Electric Tramways and the Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1931Mad152; (1931)60MLJ551

..... a contention very difficult successfully to maintain. to begin with, the electricity act does not purport to be a code. it does not even purport to be a consolidating act like the arms act, the abkari act or the petroleum act. it is an act to amend the law relating to the supply and use of electrical energy. so far from being obviously complete in itself, as i have ..... mentioned, a great deal of time was spent before us in trying to ascertain whether a license issued under this act can extend to .....

Karuppiah S. and ors. Vs. Chennai Dock Labour Board

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ715Mad

..... or regulations. strong reliance is placed by the appellant on the case of u.p. state electricity board v. harishankar . the court therein held that the standing orders act was a special act vis-a-vis the electricity act and that standing orders act would override section 79(c) of the electricity supply act as section 79(c) was only an incidental provision in the enactment relating to ..... secretary, madras harbour workers' union v. industrial tribunal 1972 i llj 8 wherein it was held that the tribunal has no power to amend or alter the statutory schemes framed under the madras dock workers (regulation of employment) act, 1948, as those schemes have statutory force.8. reliance placed by the appellants on the age of retirement in the standing order which .....

N. Viswanathan and ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its C ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1347

..... is suffice to state that there was no denial that the fifth respondent is a deemed university in terms of section 3 of the ugc act and that the petitioners are having diplomas in electrical and electronics engineering obtained from them under the distance education programme.19. mr. m. vaidyanathan, learned counsel for tneb, submitted that the diplomas ..... or benefits already earned, acquired or accrued at a particular point of time, a government servant has no right to challenge the authority of the state to amend, alter and bring into force new rules relating to even an existing service.34. the rules framed by the state government in respect of the tamil nadu ..... be a ground to make the board to commit further illegalities.38. the supreme court vide its judgment in bihar public service commission v. kamini reported in : 2007 5 scc 519 has held that merely because in the post some ineligible candidates were treated as eligible that cannot be treated as precedent for other similar type persons .....

The Management of Tractor's and Farms Equipment's Ltd., K. Patti Plant ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ406

..... stall a properly laid claim before the labour court, it will not only result in unjust encroachment at the powers of the labour court which after the t.s. state amendment of 1998 has given plenary powers to labour courts in dealing with the dispute of non-employment.41. the prayer for issuance of a writ either in the nature of ..... .22. before proceeding to deal with the rival contentions, it is necessary to trace the history of section 2a of the i.d. act. section 2a of the i.d. act was introduced by the parliament by the amendment made by act 35 of 1965. section 2a reads as follows:2-a. dismissal, etc., of an individual workman to be deemed to be an ..... a dispute will fall under section 2(k) and not under 2a(2) of the i.d. act. 10. the learned counsel brought to the notice of this court, the judgment of the supreme court reported in 2007 (4) l.l.n. 99 bharat heavy electricals ltd. v. anil and ors. after referring to para 13 and in light of the said observation .....

R.Santhana Raj Vs. the Chief Engineer

Court : Chennai

..... 12 (2), it was held by a learned judge of this court in bharat heavy electricals ltd vs. tamil nadu electricity board {2007 (2) mlj 111} that the erection of poles in the property of the person, without obtaining his consent under section 12(2) of the said act, was illegal. in an another decision in superintending engineer, tneb vs. m.sengu vijay {2011 ..... state government.(3) the provisions of the enactments specified in the schedule, not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, shall apply to the states in which such enactments are applicable.(4) the central government may, as and when considered necessary, by notification, amend the schedule.(5) save as otherwise provided in sub section (2), the mention of particular matters in that .....

Indeco Ventures Limited, Chennai Vs. ---

Court : Chennai

..... mills, wind turbines, biomass solar, municipal waste, bio-diesel and other equipments to sell, distribute, supply and share the energy to governments, companies, industries, electricity boards and individuals according to law for the time being in force and also for self-consumption. it is further stated that the petitioner company provides for all ..... the requirements of the company and that such reduction be effected by cancelling and extinguishing 29,50,000 class ii equity shares. resolved further that consequential amendments be made in the capital clause of the memorandum and articles of association of the company after the said reduction in capital of the company becomes operative ..... of this court for dispensing with the words and reduced as contemplated in section 102(3) of the act.6. it is seen from the averments in the petition that to comply with the tamil nadu electricity regulatory commission rules, the arrangement was made and now there is no need for such arrangement and hence .....

T.R. Raghava Iyengar and Co. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissio ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1963Mad238; (1963)ILLJ32Mad

..... ) the factory must be one in which 20 or more persons are employed. (the number of employees was fixed as 50 or more before the amending act xlvi of 1960). the word 'employee' is defined in section 2(f) as follows: 'employee means any person who is employed for wages in any kind of ..... commr.,up., : (1957)iillj225all , wherein a single judgeof that court held that a torch case is only anarticle for purposes of keeping batteries and notfor purposes of generating electricity, and thattherefore the torch case is not a mechanical orelectrical product, though the ease is produced bycutting, shaping and soldering brass iron sheets bymeans of machineries. the bombay high ..... , and turn these raw materials into household vessels and utensils by employing manual labour. the products so shaped and turned into wares are polished with the aid of electric motor of 6 h. p. according to the petitioners there are only three employees under them who do the packing and despatch of the finished wares. the workers .....

Subramaniam Vs. State Rep. by Sub-inspector of Police, Erode

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3501

..... petitioner. the accused 1 and 2 were charged for offences punishable under ss. 39(1) and 44(1)(c) of the indian electricity act as amended by tamil nadu act 1980 read with s. 39 and s. 44(c) of the indian electricity act, 1910. 2. the first accused is the proprietor of astalakshmi ice factory at door no. 13-a, kalaimagal kalvi nilayam road, erode ..... and acquitted him, but found the second accused guilty for tampering with the meter and committing theft of electricity, convicted him under sections 39(1) and 44(1)(c) of the indian electricity act (as amended) and sentenced him under s. 39(1) of the said act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of rs. 500/- and under s ..... . 44(1)(c) of the said act to pay a fine of rs. 500/- in default under each of the .....

R. Kapanipathi Rao and anr. Vs. M.S. Meyyappan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1974Mad57

..... -law, expressed the view that the lease of a 'cinema theatre including furniture, electric installation, machinery and equipment' fell within the ambit of the amended definition of the word 'building'.22. we shall now refer to the two decision of the supreme court which have a hearing ..... bench of the kerala high court in govindan v. kunhilekshmi amma : air1966ker244 , took the same view and the definition of the word 'building' in the kerala act, which was amended in 1961, included the words 'any fittings affixed by the landlord.' vaidialingam, j., speaking for the full bench, after an elaborate review of the relevant case ..... hire of talkie equipment machinery, buildings and lessors' fixtures. the question which arose herein was whether the provisions of the madras buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1946 (act xv of 1946) would apply to the lease in question. their lordships held that the lease in question was not a lease of a mere 'building .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kel Components Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]240ITR842(Mad)

..... , first schedule and second schedule. there was an amendment to the said act and the relevant entries in so far as they are applicable to the present assessment years are concerned read as under : '5. electrical equipment : (1) equipment for generation, transmission and distribution of electricity including transformers. (2) electrical motors. (3) electrical fans. (4) electrical lamps. (5) electrical furnaces. (6) electrical cables and wires. (7) x-ray equipment ..... coils, magnetic materials and micro-wave components'. it is relevant to notice that prior to the amendment of column 8 of item 5, there was a reference to electrical equipment which was subsequently amended as electronic equipment. item 6 of the first schedule to the industries regulation act no doubt includes radio receivers, television sets and teleprinters. but, on that account, it cannot be .....