Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 17 amendment of section 153 Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1,423 results (2.435 seconds)

Madura Coats Ltd. Rep. by Its Vice President, Legal and Company Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009LC(MAD)837; (2009)8MLJ1320

..... ) no. 167 dated 11.10.2000 by which the interest regarding current consumption deposit was deleted. the said amendment was made in exercise of powers conferred under section 49 of electricity (supply) act 1948, (central act liv 1948 read with section 79(j) of the act. the petitioners contended that withdrawal of interest on the current consumption deposit would add more sufferance to the textile ..... correctly decided the issue in proper perspective. the learned judge while coming to the conclusion that the amendment is not unilateral or unreasonable or arbitrary, referred to various terms and conditions of supply of electricity of tamil nadu electricity board and the provisions of the tamil nadu electricity act.12. as per clause 15.04, the current consumption deposit is being collected and as per .....

The Management of Nagapattinam Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Madras and an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1971Mad358; (1971)IIMLJ347

..... or intangible. so too we think the expression 'property' in art. 31(2) as substituted by the constitution (fourth amendment) act, 1955 and even before it, comprehends an undertaking like the electricity undertakings in question. property means a bundle of rights, which need not necessarily be physical assets, but may include also ..... the local authority concerned. in respect of purchase otherwise than following revocation, the amending act provides that the state electricity board shall have the option to purchase the undertaking in the case of a licence granted before the amendment, on the expiration of each such period as is specified in the licence, ..... the manner in which compensation is to be given. the constitution (seventh amendment) act 1956 deleted the three entries and substituted entry 42 in list iii by the existing entry 'acquisition and requisitioning of property'. in the circumstances, therefore, west ramnad electric distribution co. ltd. v. state of madras, upheld the validity .....

Raj Brothers Agencies and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1977]39STC191(Mad)

..... the other hand, the learned counsel for the revenue contended that it is true that such a special entry, item 3-a, was introduced by the amending act in the first schedule. but still battery is 'electrical goods'. therefore, it would be covered by entry 41 as well and the accessories of batteries which have not been specifically mentioned in entry 3-a ..... might be that batteries are electrical goods and the battery plates sold by the assessees are accessories or component parts of such batteries. but, in view of the specified entry in 3-a, we are of the view that batteries as such were excluded under entry 41. the result of it is though in specific terms amending act no. 7 of 1965 did .....

Salem Textiles Limited 'B' unit rep. by Its General Manager (Tech), Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ844

..... incorporated into act 12 of 2003, viz., tamil nadu tax on consumption or sale of electricity act,2003, the learned senior counsel submitted that even after the amendment act has been introduced as a validating law, the ..... under the old act from payment of tax, the same is not taken away by the advent of new law, with reference to entry no. 53 of list ii of the constitution of india.5. while admitting that a new act has been enacted in tamil nadu act 38 of 2007, viz., tamil nadu tax on consumption or sale of electricity (amendment) act, 2007, by which amendments have been .....

Voice Consumer Care Council Rep. by Its Founder Trustee, Chennai Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ799

..... no repugnancy 'in fact' and as such, the impugned g.os. are sustainable. in indian aluminium co. ltd v. karnataka electricity board (cited (iv) supra), the point was as to whether electricity (supply) (karnataka amendment) act, 1981, was repugnant to industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, a central legislation. while reiterating the parliamentary supremacy, the supreme court held that in deciding the question of legislative ..... , karnataka government and the indian aluminium company, specifying the electric tariff for a stipulated period, state amendment was brought forth increasing the tariff and that was questioned as being unconstitutional and repugnant to the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951. firstly, the matter was dealt with by the karnataka high court and it upheld the contention of the state government that even though .....

Rajam Chemicals Vs. Chairman Tangedco

Court : Chennai

..... 'megalithic cists and cairns' and, therefore, no objection certificate from the competent authority is a must for undertaking construction in accordance with the provisions of the amendment act,2010, and for effecting electricity service connections. the learned counsel would rely upon the following decisions : (i) (2010) 5 mlj 81.(indian national trust for architectural and cultural heritage ( ..... /asi, in reply to a letter, has admitted that for supply of electricity connection, noc is not necessary and that the amendment act is not applicable coupled with the admission of the third respondent, to an rti query, that after the amendment act on and from 01.01.2010, 360 domestic service connections and 78 commercial ..... approval ka.not bl.669/09/f1, dated 18.11.2009.3. in the meantime, he has entered into a joint venture agreement, dated 14.10.2007, with m/s.vasavi builders, fifth respondent herein; he has already registered the undivided share of land from the year 2009 onwards in favour of the .....

Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...

Court : Chennai

..... clause (h) of sub section (1) of section 79, read with clause (g) of sub section (2) of section 178 of the electricity act, 2003. 75. it is not in dispute that the amendments in the grid code and in the ui regulations have been brought about, by the commission, in exercise of its delegated powers of legislation. as ..... 4.2009. 25. it has been further stated that the supreme court of india in its decision, in central power distribution power company limited vs. the central electricity regulatory commission, (2007) 8 scc 197, has recognized the role and the functions of the central commission, in specifying the grid code and the ui charges, for the purpose ..... manifest arbitrariness and irrationality is an exception to the said principle. therefore, the said decisions are of no avail." 47.6) in state of kerala vs. unni, (2007) 2 scc 365, it had been held as follows: "the principles on which constitutionality of a statute is judged and that of a subordinate legislation are different. a .....

B.T.Kokila Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... 126, is the fact that the consumer must be alleged to be guilty of dishonest intention, to be liable to be proceeded under section 135. 6. section 126, after amendment under the electricity (amendment) act, 2007, reads as follows : 126. assessment :- (1) if on an inspection of any place or premises or after inspection of the equipments, gadgets, machines, devices found connected or used, or ..... after inspection of records maintained by any person, the assessing officer comes to the conclusion that such person is indulging in unauthorised use of electricity, he shall provisionally access to the .....

Ashley Alteams India Limited. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Chennai

..... 25.5.2012. for which a reply is given by the financial controller/revenue justifying the demand based on the order passed by the electricity regulatory commission and the notification dated 16.12.2011. the amended regulation 5(5)(vii)(a) reads as follows:- in the principal code, in clause (5) of regulation 5, the following sub ..... layland. m/s.sipcot allotted 20 acres of land to the petitioner at sipcot industrial park, chellaperumbulimedi, cheyyar taluk, thiruvannamalai by allotment order dated 18.9.2007 and the entire cost except a sum of rs.100/- was paid. possession was handed over to the petitioner and the industrial unit has been set up. ..... includes any land, building or structure;"36.therefore, on a reading of the above provisions, it is clear that the term premises under the electricity act, 2003 and under the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 would also mean the building or structure to which the service connection is granted. according to the learned counsel for the .....

O. Radhakrishnan and anr. and S. Chettiar and ors. Vs. Manickam and or ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)2MLJ179

..... 1959) this is to give you notice that the gujarat electricity board has decided to exercise and ..... notice issued by the mate electricity board was in the following terms:dear sir,in exercise of the powers conferred on the gujarat electricity board by virtue of section 71 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, read together with section 6 of the indian electricity act, 1910, as amended by the indian electricity (amendment; act, 1959 (xxxii of ..... where a license has been granted to any person not being a local authority, the state electricity board shall(a) in the case of a license granted before the commencement of the indian electricity (amendment) act, 1959 on the expiration of each such period as is specified in the licence.......... have the .....