Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Sorted by: old Page 91 of about 15,591 results (0.831 seconds)

Shiffman Vs. Selective Service Local Board No.5

Court : US Supreme Court

..... loan assn. v. federal home loan bank (mr. justice douglas); the existence of an important question not previously passed on by the court ( mcleod v. general electric co. (mr. justice harlan)); possible mootness occurring if a stay is denied (in re bart (mr. chief justice warren)); and pendency of similar or identical issues ..... 912, cert. granted, may 20, 1968, raises the same issue presented in these cases, viz., whether 10(b)( 3) may, consistent with the first amendment, preclude judicial review of petitioner's punitive reclassification and order to report for induction made by his local board after petitioner had returned his selective service registration certificate to ..... and see rosenberg v. united states, 346 u.s. 273 , 289 , 1161 (separate opinion of mr. justice frankfurter.) although the selective training and service act of 1940 made no explicit provision for judicial review of the action of local boards, and in fact made their decisions 'final,' we found that congress had not .....

HardIn Vs. Kentucky Utilities Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in a narrow corridor between the two villages and the tennessee-kentucky state boundary 16 miles away. by 15d of the tennessee valley authority act of 1933, as added by the 1959 amendments to that act, congress barred the tva from expanding its sales outside "the area for which the corporation [tva] or its distributors were the primary ..... such area." this is followed by a proviso denying tva the right to serve within this additional region any "municipality receiving electric service from another source on or after july 1, 1957." since the act makes the existence of a private supplier an explicit bar to tva expansion only within the additional region, we cannot read ..... of these cases. * together with no. 50, powell valley electric cooperative v. kentucky utilities co., and no. 51, tennessee valley authority v. kentucky utilities co., also on certiorari to the same court. [ footnote 1 ] tennessee valley authority act of 1933, 15d(a), 73 stat. 280, as amended, 73 stat. 338, 16 u.s.c. 831n(a). .....

R.D.K. Sita Devi Vs. C. Anna Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970AP43

..... to notice the remarks in a. s. k. d. krishnappa v. s. v. v. somaiah, : [1964]2scr241 which are as follows: 'the limitation act is a consolidating and amending statue relating to the limitation of suits, appeals and certain types of applications to courts and must, therefore, be regarded as an exhaustive code. it is a piece ..... or reference to proceedings to which they do not expressly apply or could be said to apply by necessary implication.' the estates abolition and conversion into ryotwari act (act xxvi of 1948) is a special enactment and the disputes there under are adjudicated by the settlement officer and the tribunal which are not courts. article 182 ..... [1953]4scr351 it was pointed out that article 181 of the limitation act, has in a long series of decisions been held to govern only applications under the code of civil procedure and with approval extracted the passage from hansraj gupta v. official liquidators, dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co., 60 ind. app 13 at p. 20 = (air .....

Sundaram Motors Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1969]71ITR587(Mad)

..... assessment year 1957-58 the applicants have purchaser plants of varied description and claimed development rebate under section 10(2)(vib) of the income-tax act, 1922, as amended but the finance act, 1955(xv of 1955). in particular, the claim for rebate was made but the respective applicants as under : applicant in tax cases no. ..... that the applicant company is not entitled to the development rebate provide under section 10(2)(vib) of the act ?tax case no. 129 of 1964. - whether the claim for development rebate is not admissible for adometers, electric fans, cars, cycles, typewriters and survey instruments with the meaning of the section 10(2)(vib) ?the ..... 80 of 1964 in respect of (1) electric fans, (2) bicycles,(3) motor cycles, (4) office cars,(5) jeeps, (6) tractors, (7) typewriter and office appliances, and (8) electric .....

Birendra Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. Gulwant Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC1068; [1968]2SCR870

..... applicable to the appellants, because the sub-lease in their favour was executed on 5th june, 1947, prior to the enforcement of that amendment act. it is urged that, on the date of the commencement of the amendment act, the appellants were sub-tenants of this land. this plea fails, because we are unable to accept the submission that the appellants ..... , even after the surrender by parmeshwar singh, is claimed by the appellants, is based on the provisions of section 295a of the tenancy act which was introduced in that act by section 26 of the united provinces tenancy (amendment) act x of 1947 and which reads as follows :- '295-a. notwithstanding any contract to the contrary or anything contained in this ..... , is a sub-tenant shall, subject to the provisions of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 27 of the united provinces tenancy (amendment) act, 1947, be entitled to retain possession of his holding for a period of five years from that date, and for this period nothing in sub-section (2) .....

The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. N. Ramachandra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP328

..... 3) that the various g. os. relied upon by the petitioners are of administrative charter and they cannot override the statutory provisions of section 15 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. 9. sri narasaraju for the petitioners contends:-(1) that the provisions of section 78a control the powers of the board under section 15 and the ..... in respect of salaries, allowances and other conditions of service till corresponding rules and regulations are framed by the andhra pradesh state electricity board under section 79(c) of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. it is denied that the petitioners have any legal vested rights for being appointed as accountants and they are all working ..... of this contention. 18. in g. o. ms. no. 1613 dated 24-9-1957, the government of andhra pradesh under art. 309 of the constitution amended the special rules for the andhra ministerial service, wherein after category 6 in rule no. 2, and the entries relating thereto, the following has been inserted:-category 8 .....

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Amar Radio Cabinet Works

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1968]22STC63(Bom)

..... referred to this court. 3. entry no. 65 of schedule c to the bombay sales tax act, 1959, as it stood prior to the 1st of april, 1963, when it was amended, was in the following terms :- '65. wireless reception instruments and apparatus and radio gramophones, and electrical valves, batteries, transmitters, accumulators, amplifiers and loudspeakers required for use therewith and spare parts of ..... be stated that the court is concerned in the present reference with the said entry as it stood prior to its amendment on the 1st april, 1963. the general residuary entry, being entry no. 22 in schedule e of the said act, is in the following terms :- '22. all goods other than those specified from time to time in schedules a, b .....

Udai Ram Sharma and ors. Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1968]3SCR41

..... the constitution. as shown above, there have been instances where the latter course had been adopted by the indian parliament in the past. section 4 of the amending act being within the legislative competence of parliament, the provisions thereof are binding on all courts of law notwithstanding judgments, orders or decrees to the contrary rendered or ..... s. 10 of the impugned ordinance. the question has engaged the attention of this court in a number of cases and we may refer to the case of west ramnad electric distribution co. ltd. v. state of madras (4) by way of (1) [1940] f.c.r. 110. (2) [1944] f.c.r. 295 (3) [1944] ..... would have been validly made, given, issued, taken or done, had the madras electricity supply undertakings (acquisition) act, 1949 (madras act xliii of 1949), and the rules made thereunder been in force on the date on which the said orders, decisions or directions, notifications, proceedings, acts or things, were made, given, issued, taken or done are hereby declared to .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Kalyan Borough Municipality an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC991; (1968)70BOMLR733; 1969MhLJ32(SC); [1968]3SCR137

..... the respondent is dattatraya pandurang pimpale. 7. during the pendency of the above appeals, parliament enacted the electricity (supply) amendment act, 1966 (act xxx of 1966) (hereinafter called the amendment act), by which the supply act was amended, in various particulars. it is only necessary to refer to two sections of the amendment act, viz., ss. 11 and 24. section 11, substituted, with retrospective effect new s. 49, in the ..... , with particular reference to such development in areas not for the time being served or adequately served by any licensee. section 49 as incorporated by the amendment act of 1966 retrospectively, makes provision for the sale of electricity by the board to persons other than licensees. as, in these appeals, the proper interpretation to be placed on that section arises for consideration, that .....

indo Impex Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1968]22STC66(Cal)

..... balance of rs. 46,052 must be the value of materials supplied by the petitioner as he had, in the return, already excluded labour charges. in the amendment petition the petitioner stated that he was obliged to submit a return like this upon the threat of respondent no. 1 that unless it made a statement like ..... his assessment order for the year 1957-58, which is at annexure c, respondent no. 1 assessed sales tax under the act upon a turnover of rs. 46,052-2-6 on account of 'sales from electrical contract' rejecting the petitioner's claim for exemption on that account.5. aggrieved by the said order, petitioner appealed to ..... pursuance of the aforesaid direction.2. though the petition has become somewhat clumsy after amendment, the substance of the petitioner's case is that the agreement at annexure a by which the petitioner-company contracted with the calcutta corporation to instal certain electric lamp posts, constituted an indivisible works contract and did not include any separate contract .....