Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 1,739 results (2.935 seconds)

Vishal Agrawal and anr. Vs. Chattisgarh State Electricity Board Andanr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ), 151 (b) were inserted. in the statement of objects and reasons for amending the act, it was stated as ..... the cognizance of the offence under the act shall not in any way prejudice the actions under the provisions of the indian penal code. the principal electricity act, 2003 was further amended by the electricity (amendment) act, 2007 and apart from other amendments in section 151 of the prinicipal act was also amended and provisions in sections 151, 151(a ..... proviso to section 151 along with insertion of sections 151(a) and 151 (b) vide electricity (amendment) act, 2007, this position was made abundantly clear namely cognizance of an offence punishable under the act could be taken upon a report of police officer filed under section 173 of the code of .....

D.K. Nabhirajiah Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC339; [1952]1SCR744

..... the control order speaks only of the requirement of the house for the occupation by any of the officers and nothing is said about the occupation of any individual. the amending act did not introduce the words'or for the occupation of any individual' into sub- clause (4). therefore, it was urged that the whole basis of the advocate ..... respondent as required by law but added that he wanted the premises for his own use to set up one of his grown-up sons in a business in electrical goods. the third respondent aswathanarayan rao however wanted the house for a children's school which he was running under the name of bala mandir and so not ..... power of eminent domain, in which case alone questions relating to compensation and public purpose will arise. 28. in the course of the arguments, it was suggested that the amendment notification of 4th may, 1949, introducing the words'or for the occupation of any individual' was invalid because the regulation of letting and and sub-letting under clause (bb .....

Sha Mulchand and Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Jawahar Mills Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC98; [1953]23CompCas1(SC); (1953)IMLJ364(SC); [1953]4SCR351

..... was the residuary article, must be limited to applications under the code. that reasoning, it is pointed out, is no longer applicable because of the amendment of the limitation act by the introduction of the present articles 158 and 178. these articles are in the third division which governs applications but they do not relate to applications ..... the article applies only to applications under the code. the following extract from the judgment of the judicial committee in hansraj gupta v. official liquidators, dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway company limited (1933) 60 i.a. 13 , is apposite :- 'it is common ground that the only article in that schedule which could apply to such ..... to be read into the first column as if those words actually occurred therein, we are not of opinion, as at present advised, that the subsequent amendment of articles 158 and 178 must necessarily and automatically have the effect of altering the long acquired meaning of article 181 on the sole and simple ground that .....

Nalinakhya Bysack Vs. Shyam Sunder Haldar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC148; [1953]4SCR533

..... aside the order of the trial court passed on the 4th july, 1950. while the application was pending before the high court the west bengal premises rent control (temporary provisions) (amendment) act, 1950 (act lxii of 1950) came into force on the 30th november, 1950. on the 9th april, 1951, the high court following an earlier decision of another bench of that court ..... out in crawford v. spooner [6 moo. p.c. 1; 4 m.i.a. 179], aid the legislature's defective phrasing of an act or add and amend or, by construction, make up deficiencies which are left in the act. even where there is a casus omissus, it is, as said by lord russell of killowen in hansraj gupta v. official liquidator of ..... dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway co., ltd. [(1933) l.r. 60 i.a. 13; a.i.r. 1953 p.c. 63], for others than .....

National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. Vs. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd. (J. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC357; (1954)56BOMLR21; (1953)IIMLJ215(SC); [1953]4SCR1028

..... letters patent. 16. reliance was placed by the appellants in the high court and before us on the decision of the high court of judicature of calcutta in indian electric works v. registrar of trade marks : air1947cal49 wherein a contrary view was expressed. 17. after a full consideration of the very elaborate and exhaustive judgment delivered in that ..... to a great extent been modified by preserving the powers of indian legislative authority in section 9 of the high courts act, by the amended clause 44 of the letters patent and by section 223 of the 1935 act. the learned judge however felt that there was still a difference of a vital character between the letters patent of the ..... brand' in the place of the words 'eagle brand'. thereafter in the year 1942 the appellants applied to the registrar of trade marks, bombay, for registration of their amended mark as a trade mark, in class 23, in respect of cotton sewing thread claiming that the mark had been in use by them since the year 1939. though .....

The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras Vs. Sri Lakshmind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1954SC282; 20(1954)CLT250(SC); [1954]1SCR1005

..... by the learned counsel on both sides, it may be convenient to refer briefly to the scheme and the salient provisions of the act. 8. the object of the legislation, as indicated in the preamble, is to amend and consolidate the law relating to the administration and governance of hindu religious and charitable institutions and endowments in the state of madras. as ..... in their character and offended against article 15 of the constitution. as has been stated already, after the new act came into force, the petitioner was allowed to amend his petition and the attack was now directed against the constitutional validity of the new act which replaced the earlier legislation. 5. the learned judges, who heard the petition, went into the matter with .....

Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Syed Ahmad Ishaque and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1955SC233; [1955]1SCR1104

..... of an election tribunal which had become functus officio should also be refused, and he further relied on the observations of atkin, l.j. in rex v. electricity commissioners; london electricity joint committee co. (1920), ex parte [1924] 1 k.b. 171 as establishing that there was no difference in law between a writ of prohibition and ..... is sufficiently comprehensive to take in any person who has the custody of the record, and the officers mentioned in section 103 of act no. xliii of 1951 would be persons who would be amendable to the jurisdiction of the high court under the article. 19. it is argued that the wording of article 226 that the high ..... issue of a notification and terminating with the declaration of election of a candidate, and that an application under article 226 challenging the validity of any of the acts forming part of that process would be barred. these are instances of original proceedings calling in question an election, and would be within the prohibition enacted in .....

Burn and Co., Calcutta Vs. their Employees

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC38; (1957)ILLJ226SC; [1956]1SCR781

..... one of retrenchment as that word is ordinarily understood, and will not be appealable under section 7(1) (b). in 1953 the legislature enacted the industrial disputes (amendment) act xliii of 1953 wherein 'retrenchment' was for the first time defined so as to include, subject to certain exceptions, the termination by the employer of the service ..... tribunal in so far as it modified the order of the tribunal as regards the four employees aforesaid, was without jurisdiction, and the decision in ranganathan v. madras electric tramways : (1952)illj772mad and sudershan steel rolling mills v. their workmen [1956] 2 l.l.j. 64, were relied on in support of this contention. ..... by the civil court, and the decisions in pankaj kumar ganguli v. bank of india [1956] 60 c.w.n. 602 and upper ganges electric employees union v. upper ganges valley electricity supply co. ltd. and another : air1956all491 , were relied on in support of this contention. 15. we agree that an order refusing reinstatement would .....

Baroda Borough Municipality Vs. Its Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC110; (1957)59BOMLR235; (1957)ILLJ8SC; [1957]1SCR33

..... to supply electrical energy to only for use of the inhabitants of the ..... any works for the supply of electrical energy (see clause q1). it is worthy of note that clause (q1) was inserted by an amending act in 1951 (bombay act 44 of 1951). a similar amendment was made in the same year in s. 66 of the municipal act and the effect of the amendment was the municipality could incur expenditure ..... intended ........ the baroda city municipality will have to be issued licence for the generation and distribution of electricity as per baroda electricity act and the municipality should immediately apply for such a licence for the supply of electric power not only within the municipal limits but within a twenty miles radius round baroda. the municipality should .....

Kailash Nath and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC790; [1957]8STC358(SC)

..... to whether the 1st respondent, the state of uttar pradesh illegally and unauthorisedly levied sales-tax on the 2nd petitioner-firm, under the uttar pradesh saks tax act (u. p. act xv of 1948) with regard to the cloth manufactured by the 2nd petitioner, with a view to exporting such cloth outside the territories of india, by ..... the fundamental right to carry on business which is guaranteed to every citizen of india by art, 19(1)(g) of the constitution. if, as contended, the act is ultra, vires the constitution and consequently void these onerous conditions can never be justified as reasonable restrictions within the meaning of ci. (6) of that article as ..... to tax a non-resident dealer in respect of an inter-state sale or purchase of goods, is ultra vires the constitution and wholly illegal. in the impugned act there are various provisions laying down conditions which dealers must comply with or submit to, namely, to give only a few instances, compulsory registration of dealers (section .....