Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Court: allahabad Page 5 of about 152 results (0.184 seconds)

Sri Bhagwan Gupta Vs. Kanpur Electricity Supply Company Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1269

..... applicable in the state which is not inconsistent with the provisions of the electricity act, 2003. section 185 of the act is quoted as below :'185. repeal and saving.--(1) save as otherwise provided in this act, the indian electricity act, 1910 (9 of 1910), electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948) and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 (14 of 1998) are hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal,--(a ..... state government.(3) the provisions of the enactments specified in the schedule, not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, shall apply to the states in which such enactments are applicable.(4) the central government may, as and when considered necessary, by notification, amend the schedule.(5) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), the mention of particular matters in that .....

Pooran Chand Seth Vs. Prabhat Kunwar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1979All58

..... he was a licensee. the trial court further held that in view of section 25 of the bengal, assam and agra civil courts act, as amended by u. p. civil laws amendment act, 1'972, an additional district judge, while exercising powers of the judge, small causes court, had unlimited jurisdiction to try suits for ..... out building as defined under the said explanation to article 4 of the second sch. to the provincial small cause courts act as along with the building, furniture, fixture and electrical installations and machinery was also let out to the defendant. thereupon the defendant preferred this revision challenging the order of the ..... the judge, small causes, muzaffarnagar, for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment from the cinema building known as 'taj talkies', muzaffarnagar, along with the electrical installations, refrigeration equipment, furniture, cooler engine and various other fittings and fixtures mentioned in the schedule to the plaint. the plaint allegations were that the .....

Padam Chand JaIn Vs. the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1970All644

..... -11-64 in favour of the state bank of india, agra is chargeable to duty under article 6 (1) of schedule i-b of the indian stamp act as amended by the u. p. stamp (amendment) act, 1962 and not under article 40 (b) of that schedule.19. the applicant padara chand jain will get his costs of this reference, assessed at rs. 200 ..... favour of the state bank of india, agra on 18-11-64 is chargeable to duty under article 6 (1) of schedule i-b of the indian stamp act as amended by the u. p. (amendment) act, 1962 and not under article 40 (b) of the said schedule. i further agree to the proposed order as to costs.by the court 18. our answer ..... act as amended by the u. p. stamp (amendment) act, 1962 (hereafter referred to as the act). the question for decision relates to the charge-ability of stamp duty on a document dated november 18, 1964 executed by one sri padarh chand jain of agra, and it has arisen in the following circumstances.2. sri padam chand jain, who is the sole proprietor of prem electric .....

Rameshwar Dayal (deceased by LR's) and Anr. Vs. State of U.P. and Anr. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1986All81

..... a division bench of this court in state of u. p. v. khairunnisa begum air 1983 all 320. it has also been urged that the amendment made in the act by the amending act of 1984 was also not applicable to the facts of the instant cases inasmuch as the award both by the land acquisition officer and the additional ..... plots are being acquired in the present case. (3) the land involved in this transaction, though it is 'usar' but it has been purchased for establishing an electric sub-station i.e. for construction of buildings. the land under acquisition is also being acquired for construction of buildings or factories. as such consideration for the fertility of ..... place. the area transferred is sufficiently large so as to be a proper basis for assessing the value of the land acquired. the transferee being the u. p. electricity board, the chances of the transaction being collusive are ruled out and it having taken place in september 1964, could not be associated with the acquisition in question .....

Rangesh Sharma and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1990CriLJ861

..... of energy. these two acts were enacted for erection and maintenance of ..... an employee of the u.p. state electricity board.(iv) in this context it is necessary to mention that the electricity (supply) act 1948 was enacted to provide for protection of supply of electricity and generally for taking measures conducive to electrical development and for all matters incidental thereto.8. indian electricity act 1910 (act ix of 1910) was enacted to amend the law relating to supply and use .....

Duncans Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2004All144

..... be higher. at no stage prior to the filing of this writ petition did the petitioner allege before the ficc or before the govt. of india that by the amended rp its return would be reduced to less than 12% post tax return on net worth. the chart shown by the petitioner has been manipulated by assuming in the ..... of an earlier exemption can only operate prospectively.22. in eicher motors v. union of india, (1999) 2 scc 361 : air 1999 sc 892 it was held that the amendment to the modvat scheme cannot take away a vested right which has already accrued to the assessee under the existing law.24. in state of bihar v. krishna kumar kabra ..... held by the supreme court that where the u.p. state electricity board had issued notifications under section 49 of the electricity (supply) act offering concession by way of rebate in electricity duty to the new industries so as to attract them to the state, and where a new industry had been established acting on such promise, such promise not being contrary to any .....

Gama Vs. Spl. Judge

Court : Allahabad

..... been followed by a three judge bench of this court in the case of t.n. alloy foundry co. ltd. vs. t.n. electricity board and ors. 2004 (3) scc 392. therefore, an application for amendment of the pleading should not be disallowed merely because it is opposed on the ground that the same is barred by limitation, on the contrary ..... illegality in setting aside the judgment and order dated 15.9.1999 passed by the trial court solely on the ground that amendment is barred by article 47 of the limitation act 1963(hereinafter referred to as the act.)he further submits that there is no denial of the sale deed executed between the parties and vendor of the sale ..... it had become barred by limitation on the date of application. she further submits that period of limitation provided under article 47 of the act is to be strictly applied in the present case and amendment sought being beyond period of three years could not have been allowed by court below . the revisional court has rightly set aside the order .....

Sohan Lal Vs. Hodal Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1979All230

..... the recovery of rs. 1736 as arrears of rent and electric charges. dissatisfied, the defendant filed the present revision.6. the first question that is required to be considered in this case is whether the written statement filed by the defendant was liable to be struck out. by u. p. civil laws (amendment) act no. 37 of 1972 rule 5 was added to ..... of the provision was different. it appears that section 13(5) of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1962 used the words 'the court shall order the defence against ejectment to be struck out.' subsequently, the act was amended and those words were deleted. the amending act used the words 'the controller may order the defence against eviction to be struck out.' 'interpreting this .....

S.K. Ahuja Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1977]110ITR549(All)

..... he was qualified to be appointed as valuer of immovable property of all types. by the amended notification machinery and plant has been put in a separate category, and for that category the qualification of an electrical engineer satisfies the purpose. the petitioner has already been appointed as a valuer of machinery and ..... laid proper factual foundation for holding that in case he was not appointed sufficient number of valuers would not be available for effectuating the purposes of the act. this apart, the notification of the lst august, 1975, settles the controversy. formerly, by the notification dated 6th july, 1968, immovable property of ..... are not directly concerned with that notification in the present case. on the 1st august, 1975, another notification under section 4(3) of the estate duty act was issued by the government of india superseding the previous notifications. under this notification, valuer of immovable property other than agricultural land, plantations, forests, mines .....

Gorakh Rai Son of Sahabal Rai Vs. the Civil Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2494

..... account the claim of the opposite party.therefore, the supreme court opined that the suit instituted by the respondent for possession also be covered by the amended section 5 of the act. the permanent injunction was issued for taking possession of the suit in dispute and, thereafter, for demolition. the title was vehemently denied by the ..... reported in 1981 alj 936, wherein the allahabad high court while considering the case on similar facts where injunction was sought restraining the defendants from taking an electrical line across the plot of the plaintiff who claimed to be bhumidar of such plot would have been decided only by the revenue court.12. the allahabad ..... the pendency of the suit, the present petitioner raised some constructions in the land in suit and the plaintiff, i.e., the respondents in the present case, amended the plaint and prayed for relief of demolition as well as construction and also claimed damages.4. at that stage, the petitioners in the present case, also admitted .....