Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 152 results (0.068 seconds)

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. the Benaras Electric Light and Power Co. Lt ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1973All74

..... the central legislature enacted the electricity supply act no. 54 of 1948 this act was passed for the rationalization of production and supply of electricity and for electrical development the supply act was amended by parliament by the electricity supply (amendment) act no. 101 of 1956, which came into force on 31-12-1956. this amending act introduced sections 57 and 57a and ..... provisions were without the authority of law.23. the learned single judge held that section 3 of the temporary act of 1947 was repugnant to section 22b, as introduced in the electricity act, 1910, by the amending act of 1959. we are doubtful that section 22b operates on the same field as clause (aa) of section ..... was void on the ground of repugnancy with sections 57 and 57a of the electricity supply act no. 54 of 1948, as amended by the amending act, no. 101 of 1956, and with section 22b of the indian electricity act, 1910, as amended by the central act no. 32 of 1959.2. the relevant and material facts in relation to .....

The Mirzapur Electric Supply Company Limited Vs. the State of Uttar Pr ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1975All29

..... , prevail in that state.' by virtue of these provisions, if there is repugnancy between the u.p. amendment act and the electricity (supply) act, 1943, the u.p. amendment act will prevail. the contention of the petitioners that the u.p. amendment act is void for repugnancy with the central act must fail.8. the second contention of the petitioners is that section 47-a introduced by the u ..... , 1968, demanding security of rupees one lac is no longer in force.7. the first point urged in these petitions is that the electricity (supply) (u.p. amendment) act, 1972, which introduced section 47-a in the electricity (supply) act, 1948, is repugnant to the provisions of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, and is, therefore, void on account of the provisions of article 254 of the constitution .....

Geeta Pump (Private) Limited Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2000All58

..... of the check meter along with the disputed meter when dispute is referred for adjudication by the electrical inspector and the licensee finds its case with reference to check meter. prior to the amendment of section 26(6) of electricity act, the electrical inspector or the competent person specially appointed by the state government in this behalf had a statutory ..... . besides this, the power of checking is also contained in section 20 and 39(3) of the indian electricity act, as amended in u. p. in writ petition no. 12072 of 1997, panchsheel polyclinic v. u. p. s. e. b., decided by a division bench of this court ..... duty to first determine whether the meter in question was defective and thereafter to estimate the quantity of the electricity consumed during such time as the meter .....

Ashok Kumar Agrawal Vs. Kanpur Electricity Supply Administration

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC369

..... theft of energy. since there was an allegation of theft by the licensee, it is no more open to dispute the same particularly when section 39(2) of indian electricity act as amended in u. p., which presupposes prima facie evidence against theft on certain ground. he also contends that the petitioner was given sufficient opportunity by the executive engineer, while ..... that there was theft with which i do not find any reason to differ in view of en try/incorporation of section 39(2) as amended in u. p. 25. section 39 of the indian electricity act, 1903, provided as follows : 'whoever dishonestly abstracts, or uses any energy, shall be deemedto have committed theft within the meaning of the ..... bring the situation within the scope and ambit of rule 39 (2) of the u. p. amendment in 1910 act. 33. he has also relied on the decision in the case of m/s. sarvodaya ispat pvt. ltd., ghaziabad v. u. p, state electricity board, lucknow and others. 1993 (1) crc 658. therein it was held in paragraph no. 25 .....

Electric Workers Union Vs. the U.P. Electric Supply Co.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1949All504

..... the head of the department, take samples of yarn and/or cloth for the purposes of bona fide trade dispute.this will be deleted as it is inapplicable to electric supply companies.21. no. ix. draft standing order no. 13.- this modification made by the certifying officer raises a question of reasonableness and fairness and, therefore, ..... kept by the employee concerned. the certifying officer has added the provision that a duplicate service book would be kept by the company also. this amendment comes within the scope of the act. it is possible, for example, that an employee may lose his service book and thus lose the evidence of employment. but if a duplicate ..... differ from the model, the certifying officer has the authority to substitute the model standing orders for the draft. it has been urged on behalf of the electric supply companies that this provision is merely calculated to help and guide the employers in framing their draft standing orders and does not necessarily mean that they must .....

M/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... before the special court. 8.2 procedure for taking cognizance in case of theft of electricity: i. as per the provisions of the act and in accordance with the order dated 8.6.2005 of ministry of power under electricity rules 2005 issued under power to remove difficulties and electricity (amendment) act 2007, the procedure in clause 8.1 above and as provided herein, does not absolve ..... impact on the process of assessment. earlier there was no obligation on the licensee to initiate criminal proceedings when a person is found indulged in theft of electrical energy but the amendment made by act 26 of 2007 second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 135 has made the lodging of report to police within 24 hours from the time of disconnection mandatory .....

U.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Radhey Mohan Verma

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ767All

..... notwithstanding any thing contained in sections. 4, 4-a, 5 and 6 the licence of every undertaking, unless revoked before the commencement of the indian electricity (uttar pradesh second amendment) ordinance, 1975 shall stand revoked with effect from the appointed day. on revocation of the licence under section 2, the consequences enumerated in clauses ( ..... pending. the appellant took over the company. eight years thereafter, the respondent filed the writ petition placing reliance on section 6a of the act as amended by an u.p. act and contended that the respondent was entitled to be taken into service, but was unlawfully prevented from discharging his duties. the high court ..... under section 6-a(3) of the act. sub-section (2) of section 6a reads thus '6-a(2). notwithstanding anything contained in sections 4, 4-a, 5 and 6, the licence of every undertaking, unless revoked before the commencement on the indian electricity (uttarpradesh second amendment) ordinance, 1975, shall stand revoked with .....

Baij Nath Bhattacharya Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR14]; (1998)IIILLJ206All; (1994)3UPLBEC1842

..... no. 1/57) received the assent of the president and by virtue of article 254(2) of the constitution of india the state act prevails, notwithstanding any prior law made by the parliament. in support of his argument he has placed reliance on the decision of the apex court in u. p. electricity supply ..... electric supply company ltd. v. state of u. p. (1966-ii-llj-330). on the other hand shri v. r. agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 argued that the state act will apply to the present case. state legislature is competent to enact the state act on the subject industrial disputes. u. p. industrial disputes (amendment) act 1957 (act ..... binding on us. however, section 25b and section 2(eee) have been the subject matter of amendment by the industrial disputes (amendment) act 1964. section 2(eee) was deleted and section 25b was amended. prior to its amendment by the 1964 amendment act, section 25b read as under : for the purpose of section 25c and 25f workman who .....

Mustaq Alias Mustafa Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC3146

..... appropriate court on behalf of the state after making investigation by virtue of section 135 of the act read with rule 12 of the rules.11. incidentally learned addl. solicitor general has very fairly submitted that the electricity (amendment) bill, 2005 dated 20.12.2005 has already been prepare'd by the central government ..... proposing necessary amendment in section 151 of the act, 2003. relevant part of the bill is as follows:as per the provisions contained in section 151 of the act, the offences relating to theft of electricity, electric lines and ..... with the above inferences following order is passed hereunder:both the existing section 151 of the electricity act, 2003 and rule 12 of the electricity rules. 2005 shall be kept in abeyance and can be made applicable when amendment of the electricity act, 2003 will actually take effect. the word 'cognizance' under the rule 12 of the .....

Hari Shankar JaIn and anr. Vs. Executive Engineer, Rural Electrificati ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ429All

..... the board to frame regulations governing service conditions nnilaterally under section 79(c) of the electricity (supply) act and since the electricity (supply) act was a special and later act the provisions of the standing orders act which was a general and earlier act, the standing orders act must yield to the electricity (supply) act. in hukam chand v. union of india : [1973]1scr896 , pointing out the distinction between the ..... it applies even to industrial establishments of state electricity board. before proceeding to examine the merits of these contentions it will be relevant to recall the genesis of the amendments introduced in the standing orders act by the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1956 (act 36 of 1956). section 4 of the standing orders act, before its amendment by act 36 of 1956 aforesaid, was as follows .....