Election Dispute - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: election dispute Year: 1914 Page 1 of about 75 results (0.248 seconds)Murza Hyder Alli Sahib Vs. Syed HussaIn Raza Sahib and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-1914
Reported in: AIR1915Mad444; 24Ind.Cas.316
..... any vacancy and there are provisions for the election of members of the committee and its president but under the the ..... management by the managers of the charity and its property and settle disputes between them and they can dismiss a manager and fill up ..... not possible to estimate at a money value the subject matter in dispute and which is not otherwise provided for by this act in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNachiappa Gounden, Minor by His Guardian Nallammal Vs. Rangasami Gound ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-1914
Reported in: AIR1915Mad1088; (1915)28MLJ1
..... or by a course of conduct which leads to the reasonable inference that the person elects to ratify a voidable transaction venkatasubbier v chinnasamier 1912 22mlj488 mallik saheb v malliharjundppa i ..... that the consent of the next presumptive reversioner validated the alienation 4 that plaintiff cannot dispute its validity as he consented to the alienation acquiesced in it and waived all objections .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrashankar Pranshankar Vs. Bai Magan
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-28-1914
Reported in: AIR1914Bom55; (1914)16BOMLR236; 24Ind.Cas.730
..... meaning of certain municipal rules so as to disqualify the debtor from election to a municipal office 4 in the first case disposed of by ..... us was a composition deed in the second case though it was disputed the court was not referred to a definition of the term composition ..... debtor s business for the benefit of his creditors it is not disputed that the deed now before us falls under the first class and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMusammat Amir Begam Vs. Khwaja Saiyed Badr-ud-dIn Husaini
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-27-1914
Reported in: (1914)16BOMLR413
would amount to no proper hearing of the matters in dispute there would be misconduct sufficient to vitiate the award without
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPurushottam Daji Mandlik Vs. Pandurang Chintaman Biwalkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-1914
Reported in: (1915)17BOMLR157
plaintiff originally obtained a sale deed of the property in dispute for rs 900 odd on the 17th of february 1905
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Sri Raja Kirtibas Bhup ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-21-1914
Reported in: (1915)17BOMLR32
affirming the contention of the collector that the lands in dispute were chowkidari chakran lands dismissed the actions on appeal the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNabIn Chandra Saha Vs. Sinclair Murray and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-28-1914
Reported in: AIR1914Cal818,25Ind.Cas.951
the contracts contained an arbitration clause in these terms any dispute arising out of these contracts shall be referred to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSelig Vs. Hamilton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1914
was or had been a stockholder in the company to dispute the allegation as to the length of time that he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurbuksh Proshad Tewari Vs. Kali Prosad NaraIn Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-25-1914
Reported in: 32Ind.Cas.167
order under section 84 or section 86 there is no dispute as to their interest in the allotted lands they are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhupendra Kumar Chakravarti Vs. Purna Chandra Bose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-25-1914
Reported in: AIR1915Cal378,24Ind.Cas.232
as originally drawn up the value of the land in dispute had been fixed by the plaintiff at rs 686 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT