Eking - Judgment Search Results

Md. Rashedur Rahaman Vs. the Collector of Customs

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1994)2CALLT468(HC),1995LC46(Calcutta),1995(75)ELT774(Cal)

amal kumar chatterjee j 1 short point for determination in this application under section 439 of the code of criminal...

Examining Bd. Vs. Flores De Otero

Court: US Supreme Court

examining bd v flores de otero 426 u s 572 1976 u s supreme court examining bd v flores de...

Exchange Nat'l Bank Vs. Third Nat'l Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

exchange nat l bank v third nat l bank 112 u s 276 1884 u s supreme court exchange nat...

Exchange Trust Co. Vs. Drainage Dist. No. 7

Court: US Supreme Court

exchange trust co v drainage dist no 7 278 u s 421 1929 u s supreme court exchange trust co...

Mr. Sanjeev Vaze Vs. Dr. Kunda Vaikunth

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR750

m l dudhat j 1 the respondent plaintiff in this case stood surety for the present appellant defendant to the...

O. Abdul Aziz and ors. Vs. Additional Director of Enforcement, Ministr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)2MLJ359

g ramanujam j 1 since the points involved in all these cases are substantially the same and they arise from...

Manilal Virchand Banker Vs. A.C. Bussel

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR515; 95Ind.Cas.552

norman macleod kt c j 1 the plaintiff filed this suit to recover the amount decreed to him by a...

Guli Chand and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC276; 1974CriLJ331; (1974)3SCC698; 1974(6)LC121(SC); 1973()WLN998

beg j 1 the six appellants before us by special leave were tried by the additional sessions judge of gangapur...

Hari NaraIn Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1992WLN(UC)135

n c kochhar j 1 the petitioner who has been detained in the central jail jaipur in pursuance of the...

M/S Saree Mandir Rep. by Its Proprietor Sri Jogesh Sadh Vs. M/S Gati L ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... proprietor of the appellant firm has been doing the business to eke out his livelihood the district forum opined that the appellant ..... before consumer forum the exception carved out of the proposition is eking out ones livelihood for the purpose of self employment the respondent ..... of the proprietor of the appellant firm carrying on business to eke out his livelihood and proceeding to hold that in view .....