Skip to content


Eight - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: eight Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 965 results (0.105 seconds)
Oct 19 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-19-2002

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)

..... that no portion of the investment allowance shall be carried forward for more than eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year relevant to the year of installation sub ..... investment allowance no portion of the investment allowance shall be carried forward for more than eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year relevant to the year of installation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2002 (TRI)

Sandip Save, Promod Broota, NitIn Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Nov-27-2002

Reported in: (2003)41SCL47SAT

..... that for acquiring one lakh shares loan was raised by the appellants and for acquiring eight lakh shares financial assistance was obtained from financiers by entering into separate financing cum ..... the demat accounts of the respective appellants and they thereafter transferred the shares aggregating to eight lakhs to the demat accounts of the four financing parties that the appellants collectively .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Parekh Platinum Ltd. Vs. the Stock Exchange, Mumbai

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

..... jr jnc allottees ppl appellant appellant 11 4 2000 8 cheques eight eight eight each of cheques cheques cheques rs 42 lakhs each of each ..... from ppl each of behalf of13 4 2000 8 cheques 8 eight eight each of cheques cheques cheques rs 42 each of each of ..... jnc also funded sonal enterprises he further submitted that all the eight allottee companies sonal enterprises and the said intermediary firms have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 09 2002 (TRI)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-09-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC558

..... the majority of statements of the representatives of the original exporting companies to whom these eight advance licences had been issued had stated in their voluntary statements deposed before the officers ..... packing the export products exported by them in fulfilling their export obligation associated with the eight advance licences listed under para 1 0 of this show cause notice therefore it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2002 (HC)

Pradip J. Mehta Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-03-2002

Reported in: [2002]256ITR647(Guj)

..... to say that an individual who has been resident in india for eight years out of ten preceding years should be treated as not ..... strange to treat a person who has been resident in india in eight years out of ten preceding years as an individual who is ..... for being ordinarily resident in india one should be residentin india for eight years a resident in india will be an ordinarily resident in india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2002 (HC)

Pradip J. Mehta Vs. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-03-2002

Reported in: (2002)175CTR(Guj)394

..... to say that an individual who has been resident in india for eight years out of ten preceding years should be treated as not ordinarily ..... strange to treat a person who has been resident in india in eight years out of ten preceding years as an individual who is ..... being ordinarily resident in india one should be resident in india for eight years a resident in india will be an ordinarily resident in india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2002 (TRI)

itc Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Oct-25-2002

Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC337

..... the amount of rs 69 78 348 87 rupees sixty nine lakhs seventy eight thousand three hundred and forty eight and paise eighty seven only already paid by the appellant under protest ..... imposed penalty of rs 69 78 348 87 rupees sixty nine lakhs seventy eight thousand three hundred and forty eight and paise eighty seven only on the importers under section 114a of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 2002 (HC)

Central Bank of India Vs. Delhi Motors Traders Association

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-06-2002

Reported in: 2002VIAD(Delhi)629; 98(2002)DLT606

..... to make payment immediately failing which interest would become chargeable at eight and a half per cent if the documents were not retired ..... wouldbe entitled to claim not only interest at the rate of eight and a half per cent but also additional commission the ..... claim for interest at the rate of eight and a half percent completely annihilates the bank s contention that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 2002 (TRI)

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Jagmandar Dass Jain

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Jul-29-2002

..... 1 1989 an amount of rs 2 08 779 50 rs two lakhs eight thousand seven hundred seventy nine and paise fifty only was demanded from ..... the demanded amount of rs 2 08 780 rs two lakh eight thousand seven hundred eightly only in two instalments on 21 4 1989 and 8 5 ..... as well as rs 5 238 20 rs five thousand two hundred thirty eight and paise twenty only paid by him as maintenance and retention charges .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Covelong Beach Hotel (India) Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-11-2002

Reported in: [2003]129TAXMAN473(Mad)

..... under section 80j may be carried forward only for the eight and four assessment years respectively that follow the assessment year ..... a particular assessment year that fell within these spans of eight and four assessment years respectively is of no consequence to ..... that no loss shall be carried forward for more than eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year for which the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //