Eavesdrop - Judgment Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Ibrahim Kalubhai Kazi

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)94; 2003BomCR(Cri)1346

a m khanwilkar j 1 this appeal against acquittal filed bythe state takes exception to the judgment andorder passed by...

Manohar Pandhari Deulkar Vs. Commissioner, Nagpur Division and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(6)BomCR462; 2003(2)MhLj209

v c daga j 1 this petition filed by the petitioner under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of...

Babulal Agarwalla Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1989Cal92,[1988]64CompCas461(Cal)

monoranjan mallick j 1 the plaintiff has filed this suit against the state bank of india bikaner and jaipur brabourne...

United Commercial Press Ltd. Vs. SatyanaraIn Chamaria

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal136,56CWN346

harries c j 1 this is an appeal from a judgment and decree of p b mukharji j dated september...

Berger Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on the basis of which to prosecute the petitioner except by the use of the eavesdrop evidence eavesdropping is an ancient practice which at common law was condemned as a nuisance 4 ..... that would not have accorded with the amendment this case deals only with a trespassory eavesdrop an eavesdrop accomplished by placing bugging devices in certain offices significantly the court does not purport to .....

United States Vs. White

Court: US Supreme Court

..... facilities that are used by members of the public and for much freelance police eavesdropping allowing eavesdropping with the consent of one party would destroy the statutory plan of limiting ..... be made we deal here with the constitutional validity of instantaneous third party electronic eavesdropping conducted by federal law enforcement officers without any prior judicial approval of the technique .....

Desist Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of appeals rejected the petitioners argument that this evidence was inadmissible because the eavesdropping had violated their rights under the fourth amendment the convictions were affirmed footnote ..... trespass or actual penetration of a particular enclosure we concluded that since every electronic eavesdropping upon private conversations is a search or seizure it can comply with constitutional .....

Katz Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... no physical entrance into the area occupied by petitioner held 1 the government s eavesdropping activities violated the privacy upon which petitioner justifiably relied while using the telephone booth ..... susceptible of the interpretation although probably not intended that this court has long held eavesdropping to be a violation of the fourth amendment and therefore presumptively unreasonable in the .....

Lopez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... emerges in proper perspective the court has in the past sustained instances of electronic eavesdropping against constitutional challenge when devices have been used to enable government agents to overhear ..... however diminish its potentiality for harm electronic aids add a wholly new dimension to eavesdropping they make it more penetrating more indiscriminate more truly obnoxious to a free society .....

United States Vs. United States Dist. Ct.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... under pain of criminal penalties and civil actions for damages any wiretapping or eavesdropping not undertaken in accordance with specified procedures for obtaining judicial warrants authorizing ..... the surveillance section 2511 1 establishes a general prohibition against electronic eavesdropping e xcept as otherwise specifically provided in the statute later sections provide .....