Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dowry prohibition act 1961 section 4 penalty for demanding dowry Sorted by: old Page 100 of about 6,642 results (0.306 seconds)

Ram Krishna Bedu Rane Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC246; 1973CriLJ287; 1973MHLJ268(SC); (1973)1SCC366

..... up for trial before the presidency magistrate, 4th court under sections 68(1)(b) and 85 of the bombay prohibition act, 25 of 1949.2. section 66(1)(b) of the act provides that whoever, in contravention of the provisions of the act or any rule or regulation or order made or of any licence, permit, pass or authorization issued thereunder, ..... himself shall on conviction foe punished with imprisonment and fine as provided therein.3. the appellant's defence was stat he was not under the influence of any prohibited alcohol, that he had taken javerian jivan mixture as he had stomach pain and had become unconscious as a result of an overdose of that mixture. the trial ..... be proved when its existence is directly established or when upon the material before it the court finds its existence to be so probable that a reasonable man would act on the supposition that it exists. unless, therefore, the explanation is supported by proof, the presumption created by the provision cannot be said to be rebutted.9. .....

Union of India (Uoi) Through the General Manager, Western Railway Vs. ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1972WLN1081

..... 315 that:where the whole aim and object of the legislature would be plainly defeated if the command to do the thing in a particular manner did not imply a prohibition on doing it in any other, no doubt can be entertained as to the intention.in state of uttar pradesh v. jogendra singh : (1963)iillj444sc their lordships observed:the ..... such this suit would not, therefore, be governed by article 100 and the courts below were, therefore, right in holding that it was governed by article 113 of the limitation act which provided 6 years period of limitation for such a suit.18. lastly, i may deal with the cross-objection filed by the respondent. the plaintiff was served, according ..... counsel for the union further raised the plea that the suit was barred by time. learned counsel argued that the suit was governed by article 100 of the limitation act and not by article 113 there of. this article relates to suits to alter or set aside any decision or order of a civil court in any proceeding other than .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ad-hoc Claims Commissioner and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1973All342

..... payable therefor has been provided in rule 6 read with the schedule.9. for the respondents it was urged that no provision of the railways act or of the rules specifically prohibits the claims commissioner to award compensation in aspect of a category of loss which may not have been mentioned. in rule 6, for instance, ..... such a creation the ordinary taw applicable to an individual is somewhat reversed. whatever is not permitted, expressly or by implication, by the constituting instrument, is prohibited, not by any express prohibition of the legislature, but by the doctrine of ultra vires.' (see attorney-general v. great eastern rly. co., l. r. 5 app cas 473).12 ..... section 82-a alone. he has not been expressly given any power to travel outside that section. under section 82-a compensation is payable irrespective of any wrongful act, neglect or default on the part of the railway administration. under it the railway administration is liable to pay compensation (a) for loss occasioned by the .....

Sayeedur Rehman Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC239; (1973)3SCC333; [1973]2SCR1043; 1973(1)SLJ162(SC); 1973(5)LC452(SC)

..... appellant any hearing. after the said order the appellant is said to have made several representations to the president of the board but reconsideration of the order dated february 25, 1961, was declined and it was reiterated that the appellant was entitled only to subsistence allowance during the period of suspension. that order was conveyed by the secretary, board of ..... quashed and set aside by the high court, are still operative, demanding compliance. under rule 18 and section 5 of the bihar high schools (control and regulation of administration) act (bihar act xiii), 1960 the managing committee is expected to obey the directions of the board. it may also be pointed out that under section 6 of the above ..... act orders of the board are final. it is not stated before us that the order dated april 22, 1960 was ever got set aside by the managing committee .....

Nlrb Vs. Textile Workers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... coercion under 8(b)(l)(a) when the imposition of fines for similar conduct by members, and their enforcement in state courts, does not fall within that section's prohibition. nlrb v. allis-chalmers mfg. co., supra. are an employee's 7 rights any more at stake here than they are where, as in allis-chalmers, the ..... laws." scofield v. nlrb, 394 u. s. 423 , 394 u. s. 429 (1969). [ footnote 2/6 ] the court of appeals concluded that 7 of the act, granting employees the right "to refrain from any or all" collective activities, including membership and participation in strikes, was not involved in this case. emphasizing the meaning of the word ..... under the stress of economic conflict. yet we have given special protection to the associational rights of individuals in a variety of contexts; through 7 of the labor act, congress has manifested its concern with those rights in the specific context of our national scheme of collective bargaining. where the individual employee has freely chosen to exercise .....

Sk. Bafatulla Mukhtear and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1973Cal148,77CWN171

..... its other organs. such conferment of powers and functions we are concerned with, are conferred on the executive by the people acting through their representatives in legislatures by statute and there is no express or implied prohibition in our constitution against such conferment or investment of powers. in respect of the said provisions again the rule of law ..... up for consideration before another division bench of this court consisting of b. n. banerjee and k.l. roy, jj., in c. r. no. 2190-93 of 1961 s.k. bafatulla mukhtear v. state of west bengal. the form in the order initiating section 5a proceedings contained the following words i.e., that 'the transfer may not ..... articles 31a and 31b of the constitution and there is no inconsistency between the said provisions and other sections of the act. 57. we will now proceed to decide the individual rules. c. r. nos. 2190-93 of 1961. sk. bafatulla mukhtear v. state of west bengal and others. 58. these rules under article 227 of the constitution .....

Thanthi Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1973]91ITR261(Mad)

..... officer, city circle ii(1). after such transfer the said income-tax officer issued a notice dated february 17, 1969, under section 143(2) of the income-tax act, 1961, calling upon the petitioner to produce its books of accounts relevant for the assessment year 1968-69 in respect of which assessment was pending, and for six previous years ..... if the said suppression is established, the escapement of income being less than rs. 50,000 no notice could be issued under section 148 by virtue of the prohibition contained in section 149(a)(ii). therefore, in respect of this year the proceedings under section 147(a) cannot properly be invoked by the respondent.46. in respect ..... and that as such the claim for exemption under section 4(3)(i) could be considered and decided only as part of the assessment itself. the writs of prohibition were, however, dismissed as being misconceived. the court expressed that the income-tax officer is free to investigate and decide the question of exemption at the stage of .....

R.M.S. Shanmugham Chettiar and ors. Vs. Gian Cheng Kiet

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1974Mad349

..... exception to exception. sub-clause (a) makes it clear that in spite of what is stated in sub-section (3) the provisions of the act (the prohibition under section 5 of the act) shall apply to sums required to be paid by any judgment or order of any court as they apply in relation to other sums. then sub ..... respondent-decree-holder overlooks the specific provisions contained in sub-clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (3) of section 21, quoted earlier.2. section 5 totally prohibits making of any payment to or for the credit of any person resident outside india without the necessary permission as contemplated under that section. sub-sec. (3) of ..... are not concerned with the question whether the judgment-debtor has any right to be heard by the reserve bank authorities before granting the necessary permission under the act. we are concerned with the question whether the decree-holder who is a resident outside india can enforce the judgment before obtaining the necessary permission of the reserve .....

Shriyans Prasad JaIn Vs. R.K. Bhalla, Income-tax Officer, Company Circ ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1974]94ITR34(Bom)

..... had jurisdiction to initiate proceeding for reopening the assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year 1950-51, under section 147(a) of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as 'the act'), and whether such initiation of proceedings is justified having regard to the conditions precedent to be fulfilled before the provisions of the said section can be ..... reason to believe that your income chargeable to tax for the assessment year 1950-51 has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the income-tax act, 1961; i, therefore, propose to reassess the income for the said assessment year and i hereby require you to deliver to me within 30 days from the ..... the petition. by this petition the petitioner prayed for quashing and setting aside the said notice dated march 26, 1966, and for issuing of a writ of prohibition or mandamus so that further proceedings pursuant to the said notice for reassessment should not be taken. 7. the petition is resisted by the respondent. he has .....

Niaz Khan Vs. the State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1344

..... case does not fall under article 5 of the constitution he is not a citizen of india and is a foreigner. section 3 of the foreigners act gives wide powers to the central government for prohibiting, regulating or res- tricting the enter of foreigners into india or their departure therefrom or their presence or continued presence therein. sub-section (2 ..... 14 and its validitv could be impugned if it infringed the same- he relied on certain observations made in the case of, ghulam sarwar v. union of india : [1961]3scr618 , decided by five judees of the supreme court. in paragraph 16 of the reports it was observed:article 359(1) does not operate by its own force. ..... or any part of the territory of india. in our opinion, this wide dower by necessary implication includes the power to issue a limited order. there is no prohibition in the article about restricting its scope. this kind of argument was repelled both in makhan singh's : 1964crilj217 and ghulam sar-war's cases : 1967crilj1204 and subba .....