Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dowry prohibition act 1961 section 4 penalty for demanding dowry Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 1 of about 462 results (0.272 seconds)

Jasmeet Kaur Talwar and Anr. Vs. Gurjit Singh Talwar

Court : Delhi

..... as well. the petitioners have given various claims which total up just above 66 lacs.20. section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (the dowry act) prohibits giving or taking of dowry whereas section 2 defines dowry as any property or valuable security given by or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party to ..... a marriage to other party to the marriage or by the parents of either party to the marriage in connection with marriage of the said parties. section 4 of the dowry act ..... provides for penalty for demanding dowry. certain exceptions have been made with regard to voluntary gifts given by the parents to the bride or any person related to the .....

Jasmeet Kaur Talwar and Anr. Vs. Gurjit Singh Talwar

Court : Delhi

..... as well. the petitioners have given various claims which total up just above 66 lacs.20. section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (the dowry act) prohibits giving or taking of dowry whereas section 2 defines dowry as any property or valuable security given by or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party to ..... a marriage to other party to the marriage or by the parents of either party to the marriage in connection with marriage of the said parties. section 4 of the dowry act ..... provides for penalty for demanding dowry. certain exceptions have been made with regard to voluntary gifts given by the parents to the bride or any person related to the .....

Jasmeet Kaur Talwar and anr. Vs. Gurjit Singh Talwar

Court : Delhi

..... as well. the petitioners have given various claims which total up just above 66 lacs.20. section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (the dowry act) prohibits giving or taking of dowry whereas section 2 defines dowry as any property or valuable security given by or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party to ..... a marriage to other party to the marriage or by the parents of either party to the marriage in connection with marriage of the said parties. section 4 of the dowry act ..... provides for penalty for demanding dowry. certain exceptions have been made with regard to voluntary gifts given by the parents to the bride or any person related to the .....

Hira Lal Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee, New Delhithrough Its Secre ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi24

..... re-erection of the committee. the expression 'to erect or re-erect any building' is defined in s. 3(5) of the said act and that further indicates that almirahs are nto within the prohibition of the statute. 5. in emperor v. hasanbhai rehmathbhai vinawala air 1942 bom 94, wire fence or a fence 6 feet in height and ..... must be allowed and the judgments of the two courts below set aside. the plaintiff, is thereforee granted a declaration that the ntoice under section 195 of the said act was illegal and an injunction restraining the new delhi municipal committee from demolishing the almirahs in pursuance of the said ntoice. it may, however, be open to new ..... the permission of the committee. in pursuance of this report, the respondent new delhi municipal committee, issued a ntoice to hira lal under section 195 of the punjab municipal act requiring the appellant to demolish the said almirahs. 2. the ntoice recites the description of the almirahs as 'two wooden almirahs measuring 6'x 5' each in the .....

Union of India, Through Secretary to Ministry of Finance and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1968Delhi219

..... with an application under article 226 of the constitution for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent government nto to enforce against the petitioner the central provinces and berar prohibition act vii of 1908, and also for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent government to withdraw and cancel all ntoifications, rules and orders made under the provisions of ..... that as a result of the impugned act he cannto do many things which he has in his mind. mandamus cannto issue unless there is a demand, ..... filed the petition for a mere declaratory opinion. he has done no act under the act, nor has any action been taken under the act to his detriment. he has nto even made a demand for a permit, and thus there is no demand and refusal. the prohibition act has nto been enforced against him as such. his only complaint is .....

Bhagwanti and ors. Vs. Attar Singh

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT553

..... in the court below was honestly convinced of these facts, that could, in my opinion, afford no justification for his taking cognizance of the present proceedings in face of the prohibition contained in section 195(1)(b). cr, p. code. two wrongs, it is well to remember, do nto make one right, and, for a court of law and ..... justice, to seek to punish some one, who may be considered to have committed an illegal act, by itself illegally assuming jurisdiction, is something which is unthinkable and can by no means be countenanced by this court. such a course of action defeats the very cause ..... of hearing. the order dated 2nd march, 1966 appears to have been signed by some toher officer, presumably by the officer acting for the additional district magistrate bit it is difficult to understand why the officer acting turn shri r. jain did nto taks ntoe of th3 application under section 195(1)(b), criminal procedure code, which had specifically been .....

Virendra Saigal Vs. Sumatilal Jamnalal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi14

..... talks not only of the decision in a suit being rest judicata in a subsequently instituted suit provided the other conditions are satisfied but it contains a prohibition against the trial of the same issue in a subsequent suit. the petitioner contends that decision on an issue as to jurisdiction cannot operate as rest judicata ..... proceedings or in relation to the reference and, thereforee, the filing of this application cannot confer jurisdiction on the delhi court under section 31 of the arbitration act. with regard to the application dated september 12, 1966, it is the respondent's contention that the application itself having been filed in a court which was ..... the respondent was carrying on business in delhi. upon service of the summons of this suit, the respondent filed an application under section 34 of the arbitration act for stay of the suit on the allegation that there was an agreement between the parties for reference of any disputes arising between them to arbitration. this .....

Gammon India Limited Vs. R.K. Baweja and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi701

..... j. (1) in this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution, gammon india ltd., a company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1913, has prayed for a writ of prohibition restraining respondent no. 2 from enforcing the award dated 25th february, 1969 given in his favor by the presiding officer of the industrial tribunal ..... without payment of compensation and without either serving notice or paying wages in lieu of notice is nto prohibited. payment of compensation and payment of wages for the period of notice are -not, thereforee, conditions precedent to closure.'(11) in all cases, thereforee, ..... retrenched' the legislature has nto sought to place closure of an undertaking on the same footing as retrenched under s. 25f by s. 25f , a prohibition against retrenchment until the conditions prescribed by that section are fulfillled is imposed; by s. 25fff(1), termination of employment on closure of the undertaking .....

The National Co-operative Consumers' Federation Ltd., New Delhi 24 Vs. ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1971Delhi141

..... art, 226 of the constitution in the bombay high court submitting that the said dispute was not covered by section 91 of the maharashtra cooperative societies act, 1961, inasmuch as it was not a dispute 'touching the business of the society'.the bombay high court dismissed the writ petition relying on the full bench ..... in life insurance corporation of india v. sunil kumar mukherjee, : (1964)illj442sc . on the other hand, the agricultural produce (development and warehousing corporation) act, 1956 did not itself give any protection of security of tenure of office to the employees of the warehousing corporation nor did it indicate that such protection would ..... stores. the object for which the petitioner federation was formed is to assist, aid and counsel its member-institutions and to facilitate their working and generally to act as the spokesman of the consumers' co-operative movement in india. in furtherance of these objectives, it may undertake activities such as assistance to its members .....

Shankar Lal Vs. Shadi Ram Ram Swaroop and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 7(1971)DLT311

..... , that is to say, by dating the cause of action (m a date when the remedy is available to the party.' in my opinion of the prohibition contained in the slum areas act deprives the decree-holder of his right to execute the decree, it would be found that the right to move the application has it self been taken away ..... application ought to have been moved and if it be found on that date that the right itself had been taken away by subsequent events like prohibition contained in the enforcement of slum are is act, no question of subsequent disability or the bar of limitation will arise, as the starting point of limitation for the particular application will be deemed ..... decision 1. 22-8-1956 19-4-1958 dismissed as unsatisfied. 2. 18-2-1960 16-7-1960 dismissed (slum areas act came into force on 8-2-1957), as infructuous. 3. 1-12-1960 21-1-1961 dismissad assignment was recognised since the property was situated in slum areas and the permission had not been obtained, the execution application vas .....