Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dowry prohibition act 1961 section 3 penalty for giving or taking dowry Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 2 results (0.126 seconds)

Heera Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2062

..... explanation to section 304b, i.p.c. the dowry shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961). therefore, it is also relevant to reproduce the section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961, which reads as below :--'section 2. definition of dowry-- in this act, the 'dowry' means any property or valuable security given or ..... the offence punishable under section 304b, i.p.c. but did not record the verdict of guilt with reference to the offence under section 3/4 dowry prohibition act 1961 in view of such an offence also stand covered by section 304b, i.p.c. proved against the appellant. the appellant was accordingly convicted and sentenced ..... to court of sessions and on 20-11-2002 and they were charged for committing the offences punishable under section 304b, i.p.c. and section 3/4 dowry prohibition act, 1961. at the trial, prosecution examined six witnesses to prove the charges against the appellant and others, pratap singh (p.w. 1) and his mother smt. .....

Girish Chandra Sharma, and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... u/s 498-a ipc are hereby quashed against the petitioner-girish chandra sharma only, however the proceedings shall continue against him u/s 323/506 ipc and 3/4 dowry prohibition act before the trial court.8. however, against the rest of the petitioners, namely, pavan kumar aggarwal, saurav kumar aggarwal, smt. lalita aggarwal and km. swati, the trial court ..... 161 cr.p.c. as well as considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the offences punishable u/s 323/506/498-a ipc and 3/4 dowry prohibition act are prima facie made out against them and they have rightly been summoned by the trial court. even it is the disputed questions of fact which cannot be decided ..... for quashing the charge sheet and also the entire proceedings in criminal case no.2641 of 2006, u/s 323/506/498-a ipc & 3/4 dowry prohibition act [hereinafter to be referred as the act], pending before j.m., haldwani.2. heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.3. in brief, the facts of the .....

Naresh, and ors. Vs. the State of Uttaranchal.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death.explanation.for the purpose of this sub- section, "dowry" shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to ..... term of the imprisonment provided for the offence, or with fine, or with both.section 113-b of the indian evidence act: 113-b. presumption as to dowry deathwhen the question is whether a person has committed the dowry death of a woman and it is shown that soon before her death such woman had been subjected by such person to ..... 201 ipc. in these facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court has rightly held it as a case of dowry death in view of the provisions contained under section 113-b of the indian evidence act.27. in view of my foregoing discussion, offence u/s 304- b, 498-a, 201 ipc is proved against the accused .....

Gaurav Mishra, Adv ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... no.cr.no.224/2003 registered in police station, bilaspur, (distt.rampur) filed under sections 498a, 323 and 506 ipc and under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act against the respondents herein. it is ordered accordingly. the appeal is disposed of."8. in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as in ..... the compromise, said case came to be dismissed. however, so far as the complaint under sections 498a, 323 and 506 ipc and under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act is concerned, which is the subject matter of this appeal, the appellant did not take any steps to withdraw the same. it is in those circumstances, a quashing ..... is directed for quashing the proceedings of criminal case no.2105 of 2008, state v. gaurav mishra & others, u/s 323/504/506/498-a ipc and 3/4 dowry prohibition act, pending before addl. cjm-ii, dehradun.2. a compounding application no.842/2010 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner no.1 and complainant/ respondent no.2 along .....

Mohd. HussaIn and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2(2006)DMC586

..... that the opposite party no. 2, namely, mohd. umar lodged a first information report against the petitioners under sections 498a, 420,506,120b, 323, i.p.c. and 3/4, dowry prohibition act. the police investigated the matter and submitted the charge-sheet against the petitioners on 30.11.2003.3. learned magistrate after having perused the charge-sheet took the cognizance and ..... for quashing the charge-sheet dated 30.11.2003 submitted in case crime no. 505 of 2003 under sections 498a, 420, 506, 120b, 323, i.p.c. and 3/4, dowry prohibition act. the petitioners have also prayed for setting aside the summoning order dated 13.1.2004 passed by civil judge (j.d.)/judicial magistrate, kashipur, district udham singh nagar in criminal .....

Sanjay Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : I(2006)DMC628

..... the complainant against the applicants and the same is only a counter blast of the complaint lodged by the applicant no. 5 under sections 498a, 323, ipc and 3/4, dowry prohibition act. it has also been alleged in para 9 of the petition that the applicant no. 5 has moved an application under section 125, cr. p.c. against her husband before .....

Yashpal Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3917

orderp.c. verma, j.1. heard learned counsel for the applicant and the govt. advocate.2. the applicant is involved in case crime no. 479 of 2000, under section 498a/307, i.p.c. 3/4 dowry prohibition act, p.s. dholanwala district haridwar.3. i have also gone through the rejection order passed by learned sessions judge.4. the injuries are on non vital part of the body and in my opinion it is a fit case for bail.5. let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two surties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of c.j.m. concerned in the said case crime no. 479/2000.

Sudhir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4464

orderm.c. jain, j.1. heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned a.g.a.2. the allegations against the applicants, who are the brothers of the husband of the deceased, are general in nature. the husband of the deceased is said to be in jail.3. let the applicants sudhir and sameer be released on bail in case crime no. 382/ 2000 under sections 498a, 304b, i.p.c. and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. p.s. dalanwala, district dehradun on their furnishing a personal bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the c.j.m., dehradun.4. however, it shall not offer a ground of parity to the co-accused, who is the husband of the deceased.

Smt. Madhu Vs. State of Uttarakand and Another.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... , the court must proceed against mr. kedarnath batla and smt. seema batla under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961. 5. first of all, dowry has been defined under section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961, which reads as under:- 2. definition of dowry.in this act, dowry means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly (a) by one party to a ..... 30 of the indian penal code (45 of 1860). 6. what has been stated by these witnesses prima facie is strictly speaking not an admission of giving dowry, nor can it be construed as a dowry. moreover, moving of such an application under section 319 of cr.p.c. at such a belated stage will only dilate the proceedings. 7. the powers .....

Nirmala Bhandari Vs. Mangal Singh Bhandari

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2(2006)DMC182

..... them. it is been stated by p.w. 1, mangal singh in his cross-examination also that defendant threatened the plaintiff to implicate him and his parents under dowry prohibition act by making a complaint to the police. it is also stated that the wife has filed a criminal complaint in this regard, falsely implicating the husband and his parents ..... with her, it is also mentioned in the divorce petition that the appellant intimidated the respondent and his parents that she would get them implicated in a case under dowry prohibitation act. in paragraph no. 7 of the divorce petition, it is stated that before the petition was filed, on 18.9.2003 and 16.11.2003 to resolve the ..... . apart from this, on 22.9.2004, the wife filed a complaint under sections 498-a/323/503/ 506 of ipc and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act, whereby, the respondent (husband) and his parents were alleged to have been flasely implicated. it is alleged in the petition that the respondent or his parents never demanded .....