Yashpal Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Yashpal vs State of Uttaranchal

Disposition Application allowed Court Uttaranchal Decided Mar 08, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/513949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/513949
Court: Uttaranchal High Court
Judge: P.C. Verma, J.
Decided On: Mar 08, 2001
Case Number: Cri. Misc. Bail Appln. No. 154 of 2001
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Application allowed
Acts & sections: Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 498-A

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Yashpal

Respondent

State of Uttaranchal

Legal References

Acts: Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 498-A
Reported In: 2001CriLJ3917

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant. - 5. let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two surties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of c.orderp.c. verma, j.1. heard learned counsel for the applicant and the govt. advocate.2. the applicant is involved in case crime no. 479 of 2000, under section 498a/307, i.p.c. 3/4 dowry prohibition act, p.s. dholanwala district haridwar.3. i have also gone through the rejection order passed by learned sessions judge.4. the injuries are on non vital part of the body and in my opinion it is a fit case for bail.5. let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two surties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of c.j.m. concerned in the said case crime no. 479/2000.

Full Judgment

ORDER

P.C. Verma, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the Govt. Advocate.

2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 479 of 2000, under Section 498A/307, I.P.C. 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Dholanwala District Haridwar.

3. I have also gone through the rejection order passed by learned Sessions Judge.

4. The injuries are on non vital part of the body and in my opinion it is a fit case for bail.

5. Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two surties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned in the said case Crime No. 479/2000.

Same Court & Year Uttaranchal · 2001 Same Parties Yashpal vs State of Uttaranchal Same Subject Criminal Same Judge P.C. Verma, J. Acts & Sections Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (...

Criminal