Down Payment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: down payment Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 451 results (0.213 seconds)Idea Mobile Commerce Services Limited vs.aditya Birla Idea Payments Ba ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
to a payments bank and the transfer of pre paid payment instruments ppi business by the transferor company to the transferee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijaya Rajagopal vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2017
the gaze of the taxman no document pointing to extra payment of the amounts that constituted the differential between the transaction
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKumaran Vs. State of Kerala and Anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-2017
the court and also underwent the default sentence for non payment of compensation the second respondent filed cmp no 2018 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGmr Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Excise, Entt and Luxury Tax an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
..... management thereof 38 thus the terms relevant for purposes of the enactment are entertainment payment and payment for admission equally proprietor too is relevant in relation to any entertainment for ..... the courts would be justified in striking down the impugned statute as unconstitutional 13 to further explain the differences in the nature of payments fdci argues that representatives from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFashion Design Council of India vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
..... management thereof 38 thus the terms relevant for purposes of the enactment are entertainment payment and payment for admission equally proprietor too is relevant in relation to any entertainment for ..... the courts would be justified in striking down the impugned statute as unconstitutional 13 to further explain the differences in the nature of payments fdci argues that representatives from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDen Soccer Private Limited vs.gnctd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
..... management thereof 38 thus the terms relevant for purposes of the enactment are entertainment payment and payment for admission equally proprietor too is relevant in relation to any entertainment for ..... the courts would be justified in striking down the impugned statute as unconstitutional 13 to further explain the differences in the nature of payments fdci argues that representatives from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBcci vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
..... management thereof 38 thus the terms relevant for purposes of the enactment are entertainment payment and payment for admission equally proprietor too is relevant in relation to any entertainment for ..... the courts would be justified in striking down the impugned statute as unconstitutional 13 to further explain the differences in the nature of payments fdci argues that representatives from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii vs.mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2017
..... requirement of tds having to be deducted while making such payment purchases correspondingly towards there is 49 however the element of discrimination ..... draft may 2007 did envisage deduction of tax while making payments to non residents it is viewed only as additional compliance of ..... as per the tests laid down in the said case the first question to be determined is whether the payment made to the non .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2017
..... management thereof 38 thus the terms relevant for purposes of the enactment are entertainment payment and payment for admission equally proprietor too is relevant in relation to any entertainment for ..... the courts would be justified in striking down the impugned statute as unconstitutional 13 to further explain the differences in the nature of payments fdci argues that representatives from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCbz Chemicals Ltd vs.kee Pharma Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
of 23 the design but requested for deferment of further payment by a period of 3 months c the petitioner vide
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial