Skip to content


Dock - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: dock Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 402 results (0.117 seconds)
Sep 28 2016 (HC)

T.P. Roychowdhury and Company Private Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Dock Labour Bo ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-28-2016

..... make payment to the executive officer of the plaintiff calcutta dock labour board hereinafter referred to as the board in such ..... under the provision of a scheme which is called calcutta dock clerical and supervisory workers regulation of employment scheme 1997 in ..... settlement wages and allowances salaries of all port workers and dock workers including monthly workers were revised in august 2000 with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2016 (HC)

Zulash Clearing and Shipping Agency Vs. Secretary, The Clearing and Fo ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-07-2016

..... an adequate supply and full proper utilization of unprotected workers employed in the employment in docks in connection with loading unloading including warai sorting segregating cutting stitching filling packing marking sealing ..... w 18 1 of the industrial disputes act between the employer worker and transport and dock worker union b whether the board can overlook the non compliance of provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 2016 (HC)

Chandrakant Jha and Another Vs. State and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-27-2016

..... for consideration relates to the evidentiary or probative value of the dock identification by ram babu pw 12 and whether the same is ..... pw 12 we believe and accept the prosecution case that the dock identification by the said witness of chandrakant jha carries weight ..... 6 scc 1 the supreme court elucidated and highlighted significance of dock identification observing that tip etc relate to the stage of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2016 (HC)

Vayalali Girishan and Others Vs. State of Kerala Public Prosecutor

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-15-2016

..... so called identification of the accused persons who were in the dock could not be accepted the learned counsel would further submit ..... the heinous act no test identification parade was conducted and therefore dock identification ought to have been conducted scrupulously to avoid roping in ..... the horrendous act is the person who was standing in the dock we are unable to discern for certain as to whether .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2016 (HC)

International Seaports (Haldia) Pvt. Limited Vs. Steel Authority of In ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-22-2016

..... contractor it invited tenders to build manage and maintain it on 17th september 1999 haldia dock complex on behalf of the kolkata port trust issued a letter of intent to international ..... into an agreement international seaports would be responsible for berth construction and operation at haldia dock complex it would handle the cargo of coking coal of the respondent at the port .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2016 (HC)

Sunil Bihari and Others Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-31-2016

..... fir no tip was got conducted thus omnibus identification in the dock cannot be the basis of conviction 14 learned counsel for deepak ..... the investigating officer and identification for the first time in the dock after a period of more than 2 and a half years ..... the other 4 5 utps no test identification was conducted the dock identification is omnibus as noted above wherein he says that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2016 (HC)

Fabinus Beck Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-27-2016

..... adjourned for further examination he could identify the accused in the dock moreover he is not the co villager of the deceased and ..... has admitted that none of these two persons who were in the dock were involved in committing murder of francis this witness thereafter in ..... witness by pointing towards fabinus beck appellant who was in the dock has stated that this is the person who has killed francis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 2016 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer and Others Vs ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: May-05-2016

..... the police this witness has identified the accused no 2 in the dock he has also identified the accused no 2 in the identification ..... exhs 49 and 50 she has also identified the accused in the dock and also the clothes which were worn by the accused and ..... the culvert this witness has apart from identifying the accused in the dock has also identified them in the test identification parade below exhs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2016 (HC)

Moreshwar and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: Mar-08-2016

..... concerned no identification parade is held and as such identification in dock would not be sustainable he further submits that insofar as recovery ..... police station thereafter witness billukumar identified accused no 3 in the dock it could thus be seen that identification of accused no 3 ..... police station immediately after 2 3 days and thereafter in the dock it is not in dispute that accused no 3 was not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 2016 (SC)

Baby @ Sebastian and Anr. Vs. Circle Inspector of Police Adimaly

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-26-2016

..... appellants by pw 6 it was submitted by the learned counsel that dock identification is substantive evidence this witness has clearly identified the appellants as ..... pushed the head into the slush forcibly a 1 standing in the dock was the person without shirt and a 2 is the person who ..... the shirt who pushed the head into the slush is in the dock on the other hand while deposing he says i had no personal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //