Distributable - Year 2014 - Judgments

Jan 02 2014 (TRI)

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Chhattisgarh State ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Jan-02-2014

..... the appellant has been directed to revise the bills accordingly 2 the appellant is a distribution licensee chhattisgarh state electricity regulatory commission state commission is the respondent no 1 ..... respondent no 2 has to earmark generating capacity matching with contracted power with the distribution licensee for getting the benefit of force majeure condition with necessary proof that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2014 (TRI)

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Chhattisgarh State ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Jan-02-2014

..... appellant has been directed to revise the bills accordingly 2 the appellant is a distribution licensee chhattisgarh state electricity regulatory commission oelig state commission is the respondent no 1 ..... respondent no 2 has to earmark generating capacity matching with contracted power with the distribution licensee for getting the benefit of force majeure condition with necessary proof that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2014 (TRI)

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd Vs. Maharashtra Ele ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: May-30-2014

..... i whether the state commission has erred in rejecting the proposal of the appellant distribution company for creation of a distinct category for government owned and operated hospitals and ..... consumer security deposit to the amount actually recovered by the appellant after formation of the distribution company as a successor of the erstwhile electricity board while computing the working capital .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 2014 (HC)

S.Ramanjaneyulu and Others Vs. Telangana Southern Power Distribution C ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-17-2014

..... by the firs respondent on 31 05 2014 provisionally allotting their services to southern power distribution company of a p limited apspdcl the second respondent background the andhra pradesh state ..... the six districts are krishna guntur prakasam nellore chittoor kadapa anantapur and kurnool these distribution companies for short discoms continued to be in existence as independent entities till 01 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2014 (TRI)

East Coast Railway Through Chief Electrical Distribution Engineer Vs. ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Jan-29-2014

..... in short oerc in respect of annual revenue requirement and tariff proposals submitted by 4 distribution companies discoms in orissa state viz central electricity supply utility of orissa cesu southern ..... has its own network and transmission lines that it is not responsible for transmission and distribution losses which can be attributed to other consumers that it receives electrical energy at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2014 (HC)

K.Kanthavel Vs. 1.The Executive Engineer (Distribution),

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-02-2014

..... an assessor in the tamil nadu electricity board at palamkottai in sankarankovil distribution circle the firs respondent by his proceedings in memo no 11 cepm ..... kanthavel petitioner versus 1 the executive engineer distribution tamil nadu electricity board sankarankovil 2 the superintending engineer distribution tirunelveli electricity distribution circle tirunelveli 11 respondents prayer writ .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 2014 (HC)

A.Natchi Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-16-2014

..... vs 1 tamil nadu generation and distribution corporation tangeco represented by the superintending engineer pudukkottai electricity distribution circle no 30 near old bus ..... the executive engineer tangedco pudukkottai electricity distribution circle pudukkottai 3 the assistant executive engineer tangedco pudukkottai electricity distribution circle ponnamaravathi ponnamaravathi taluk pudukkottai .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2014 (TRI)

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Through Supdt. ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Decided on: Apr-11-2014

..... 710 2008 maharashtra state consumer dispute redressal commission mumbai executive engineer maharashtra state electricity distribution company ltd osmanabad ldquo v s ramesh manoj deshmukh 8 on the other hand ..... in service in another matter bearing fa 228 2007 pertaining to maharashtra state electricity distribution company ltd through assistant and junior engineer ldquo v s babulal kuberchand gandhi .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2014 (TRI)

Shushila Purushottam Modak Vs. Executive Engineer Maharashtra State El ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Decided on: Mar-06-2014

..... electricity charges were not issued by opponent no 1 executive engineer maharashtra state electricity distribution company ltd ahmednagar it is stated by the complainant that complainant many time orally ..... is the responsibility of the complainant to visit the office of maharashtra state electricity distribution company ltd and demand the bill for electricity charges but complainant never asked for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 2014 (TRI)

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd Vs. M/S. Lanco ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Apr-03-2014

..... 4 the short facts are as follows a the appellant the distribution company entered into a power purchase agreement with m s ..... and put the commercial use to supply power to the distribution licensee and should not be equated with the consumer and ..... supply for testing and commissioning in fact clause 33 of the distribution code warrants that all intending consumers shall execute an agreement .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Distributable - Judgment Search Results