Dissimilarity - Judgment Search Results

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Behlmer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which materially affected transportation and rates might under the statute be competent to produce dissimilarity of circumstances and conditions to be taken into consideration by the carrier in ..... between carriers subject to the requirements of said act does not produce such substantial dissimilarity in the circumstances and conditions under which transportation is performed as will justify such .....

East Tennessee, Vs. and G. Ry. Co. Vs. Icc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of that character could not be availed of by a carrier as establishing substantially dissimilar circumstances and conditions without a prior application by the carrier to the commission for ..... cases be involved in the determination of whether competition was such as created a substantial dissimilarity of condition second that the competition relied upon be not artificial or merely conjectural .....

icc Vs. Alabama Midland Railway Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... case for the record discloses that the commission made some allowance for the alleged dissimilarity of circumstances and conditions arising out of competition and situation as affecting transportation to ..... similar circumstances and conditions does not define or describe in what the similarity or dissimilarity of circumstances and conditions shall consist it cannot be doubted that whether in .....

Zabar Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)IILLJ209SC; (1972)2SCC275; [1973]1SCR608

..... the conclusion reached by them was that ldquo the two services started dissimilarly and continued dissimilarly and any dissimilarity in their treatment would not be a denial of equal opportunity for ..... and the government never integrated them into one service they started dissimilarly and they continued dissimilarly and therefore the dissimilarity of the treatment by the rules was not a denial of .....

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Vs. Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Othe ...

Court: Delhi

..... and spectator according to the plaintiff analytical dissection in order to ascertain the similarities and dissimilarities are not permissible and relied on sid and marty krofft television productions inc v ..... apart from the similarities appearing in the two works there are also material and broad dissimilarities which negative the intention to copy the original and the coincidences appearing in the .....

Twentieth Century Fox Film Vs. Zee Telefilms Ltd. and ors

Court: Delhi

..... and spectator according to the plaintiff analytical dissection in order to ascertain the similarities and dissimilarities are not permissible and relied on sid amp marty krofft television productions inc v ..... apart from the similarities appearing in the two works there are also material and broad dissimilarities which negative the intention to copy the original and the coincidences appearing in the .....

M/S. McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.pr. Commissioner of ...

Court: Delhi

..... ita4612017 connected matters page 32 of 38 as the standards of selecting insofar identifying functional dissimilarities are subsumed at net margin levels as compared to resale price method or comparable ..... between controlled and uncontrolled transactions entity it would not be apposite to ignore functional dissimilarity only for the reason that its impact may be reduced on account of using .....

M/S S. M. Dyechem Ltd. Vs. M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000LC1(SC); (2000)3GLR2548; JT2000(7)SC151; 2000(4)SCALE713; (2000)5SCC573; [2000]Supp1SCR86; 2001(1)LC181(SC)

..... propose to trace the legal principles applicable to cases of infringement with particular reference to dissimilarities in essential features of a devise or mark 24 under section 29 of the act ..... above principle has not been strictly applied the english courts have laid emphasis more on dissimilarities in essential features rather than on similarity the whole thing principle is based on first .....

Smt Vijayalaxmi Shetty Vs. Mr Kochu Shetty

Court: Karnataka

..... the evidence of handwriting expert must be received with great caution when there is consistent dissimilarities in the general features of disputed writing and admitted signature and handwriting opinion of ..... expert is on the lower rank in the hierarchy of expert evidence it is the dissimilarities which are decisive and not the similarities while comparing admitted handwriting with the disputed .....

Lupin Limited Vs. Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

..... the written submission is meaningless and a futile exercise made by the defendants to allege dissimilarities 11 21 that the defendants cannot claim any equity by acting dishonestly and contrary to ..... of the defendant is meaningless and a futile exercise made by the defendants to allege dissimilarities the plaintiff has also correctly dealt with distinguished the decisions relied upon by the defendant .....