Disingenuous - Judgment Search Results

HeIn Vs. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dispatching of frothingham via the second prong of the nexus test was only marginally less disingenuous not only does the relationship of the allegedly violated provision to the taxing and spending ..... not when it comes at the cost of meaningless and disingenuous distinctions that hold the sure promise of engendering further meaningless and disingenuous distinctions in the future the rule of law is .....

Kansas Vs. Hendricks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in that light the provisions of the act for treatment appear somewhat disingenuous 259 kan at 258 912 p 2d at 136 it is ..... of provisions of the act for treatment although it called them somewhat disingenuous 259 kan at 258 912 p 2d at 136 cf kan ..... have changed its characterization of the act s treatment provisions as somewhat disingenuous 259 kan at 258 912 regardless the kansas supreme court did so .....

California Vs. Byers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as opposed to indulging in a collection of artificial if not disingenuous judgments that the risks of incrimination are not there when they ..... justice brennan s assertion that this premise is artificial if not disingenuous post at 402 u s 477 footnote 2 7 my ..... is simply to indulge in the sort of artificial if not disingenuous judgments against which my brother harlan s opinion otherwise warns ante .....

Freytag Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... are faced with a constitutional challenge that is neither frivolous nor disingenuous the alleged defect in the appointment of the special trial ..... are faced with a constitutional challenge that is neither frivolous nor disingenuous ibid that describes the situation with regard to the vast ..... 501 u s 901 extends not merely to frivolous and disingenuous challenges but even to t he most basic rights of .....

Pan American World Airways Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the court s artificial distinction again was prompted by a desire to skirt however disingenuously prior holdings footnote 3 3 in addition the court had to conjure with the fact ..... the court s handling of georgia v pennsylvania r co supra seems to me particularly disingenuous the court concedes that a conspiracy to secure cab approval of illicit agreements might form .....

Lockhart Vs. Mccree

Court: US Supreme Court

..... any suggestion that capital defendants will benefit from a single jury thus is more than disingenuous it is cruel vi on occasion this court has declared what i believe should be ..... ruse i find the court s refusal to consider the potential for this abuse rather disingenuous see grigsby v mabry 483 f supp 1372 1389 n 24 ed ark 1980 grigsby .....

Rust Vs. Sullivan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the proposition that avoidance of a difficulty will not be pressed to the point of disingenuous evasion moore ice cream co v rose 289 u s 373 289 u s 379 ..... s 408 1909 this facile response to the intractable problem the court addresses today is disingenuous at best whether or not one believes that these regulations are valid it avoids reality .....

Shantaram Sharma Vs. Kanai Lal Jatia and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1934Cal137

..... conviction of sagarmull for perjury and it appears to me that the complaint is most disingenuous and is intended to give an impression that the proceedings before buckland j terminated in ..... is not explained moreover i agree with the magistrate that the complainant was guilty of disingenuous conduct in not saying anything in his complaint as to the events which happened after .....

R.C. Pollard Vs. Satya Gopal Mazumdar

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1943Cal594

..... done again 18 i can only regard mr chatterjee s explanation in para 6 as disingenuous in para 7 of his explanation mr chatterjee says my grievance is that in mr ..... or the trying magistrate 19 the statement that no replies were even given is again disingenuous because the two subsequent letters were clearly brought by mr badruddoja personally on behalf of .....

Oregon Vs. Elstad

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s at 251 u s 392 and it is shocking that the court nevertheless disingenuously purports that it in no way retreats from the miranda safeguards ante at 470 u ..... the question whether there was any constitutional violation footnote 3 14 this ambivalence is either disingenuous or completely lawless this court s power to require state courts to exclude probative self .....