Discrimination - Judgment Search Results

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it is only by applying strict scrutiny that we can distinguish between unconstitutional discrimination and narrowly tailored remedial programs that legislatures may enact to further the compelling ..... ante at 112 o connor j concurring noting the critical difference between unconstitutional discrimination and narrowly tailored remedial programs that legislatures may enact to further the compelling .....

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... if it preserves the limited forum s purposes and on the other hand viewpoint discrimination i e discrimination because of the speaker s specific motivating ideology opinion or perspective which is presumed ..... s request for third party payments in the present case is based upon viewpoint discrimination not unlike the discrimination the school district relied upon in lamb s chapel and that we found .....

Commissioner Vs. Schleier

Court: US Supreme Court

..... causes a personal injury which in turn causes a loss of wages in age discrimination the discrimination causes both personal injury and loss of wages but neither is linked to the ..... and thus that damages received therefrom are properly excludable under 104 a 2 agreeing that discrimination violates personal rights this court nevertheless reversed because the statutory remedies do not recompense .....

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in 1968 the mississippi democratic party persisted in its pattern of exclusion of and discrimination against negroes at precinct meetings county conventions and the state convention hearings on ..... downplays the significance of this drastic limitation by arguing that voters who face electoral discrimination could sue under the fifteenth amendment but lawsuits are no substitute for the preclearance .....

Missouri Vs. Jenkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it is only by applying strict scrutiny that we can distinguish between unconstitutional discrimination and narrowly tailored remedial programs that legislatures may enact to further the compelling ..... governmental interest in redressing the effects of past discrimination courts however are different the necessary restrictions on our jurisdiction and authority contained .....

Miller Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for judicial intervention to prevent dilution of minority voting strength generations of rank discrimination against african americans as citizens and voters account for that surveillance two terms ..... or the attorney general these court decisions and congressional directions significantly reduced voting discrimination against minorities in the 1972 election georgia gained its first black member of .....

City of Edmonds Vs. Oxford House, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1988 congress extended coverage to persons with handicaps and also prohibited familial status discrimination i e discrimination against parents or other custodial persons domiciled with children under the age ..... 3607 b i that retirement communities would be exempt from the proscription of discrimination against families with minor children in the sentence immediately following the maximum occupancy .....

Purkett Vs. Elem

Court: US Supreme Court

..... affirmed the batson ruling concluding that the prosecution had not engaged in purposeful discrimination in denying respondent s subsequent petition for habeas corpus the federal district court concluded ..... that the state courts purposeful discrimination determination was a factual finding entitled to a presumption of correctness and that .....

Fulton Corp. Vs. Faulkner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to determine whether it regulates evenhandedly with only incidental effects on interstate commerce or discriminates against interstate commerce oregon waste systems inc v department of environmental quality of ..... tax cases and darnell cannot save it v north carolina s intangibles tax facially discriminates against interstate commerce it fails justification as a valid compensatory tax and accordingly .....

In Re: No. P/6 of 1995

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

Reported in: (1998)234ITR371AAR

..... upon paragraph 1 of article 26 of the double taxation agreement which provides for non discrimination between nationals of the two contracting states in respect of taxation or any requirement ..... five years for which the double taxation agreement has effect 28 as regards the non discrimination clause of the double taxation agreement the departmental representative pointed out that paragraph 2 of .....