Skip to content


Discrepancy - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: discrepancy Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.024 seconds)
Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Mico Ltd., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

..... should make enquiries from other concerned persons to establish clandestine removal in other words discrepancy in account books or shortage in stock must be corroborated with supportive evidence as ..... evidence for qcquisition of any raw material power consumption receipt of additional consideration or discrepancy between the figures declared to the sales tax and income tax authorities the observation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2001 (SC)

West Bengal State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-15-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC682; JT2001(2)SC524; 2001(1)SCALE255; [2001]1SCR352

..... employer s authorised representative as follows a where there is a discrepancy between the amounts in figures and in words the amount in ..... is germane for our discussion provides that in case of a discrepancy between the unit rate and the line item total resulting from ..... bid specifications provided inter alia in the event there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the extended total the unit price .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 2001 (TRI)

Dr. Y.R. Midha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-19-2001

..... high court judge before whom the pil was presented the applicant after highlighting the various discrepancies and irregularities in payment upto the tune of crores of rupees to a firm which ..... too not personal but involving the interest of the nation and the issue regarding financial discrepancies and illegalities at a personal level while discharging official duties by no stretch of imagination .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2001 (TRI)

United Phosphorus Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: May-22-2001

Reported in: (2002)81ITD553(Ahd.)

..... 4 2001 and also made oral submissions he pointed out certain discrepancies in the various details and charts submitted in the compilation ..... of law the assessing officer has not found any mistake or discrepancy in the said claim therefore there is no justification for ..... the assessing officer has not pointed out any mistake or discrepancy in the said charts there is no justification for disallowing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2001 (TRI)

United Phosphorus Limited Vs. Joint Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: May-22-2001

Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Ahd.)404

..... submitted that the learned commissionerdepartmental representative has also not pointed out any mistake or discrepancy in the claim so made by the assessee the deduction as claimed under sections ..... the assessing officer and the commissioner appeals have not pointed out any mistake or discrepancy in the claim so made by the assessee the learned commissionerdepartmental representative has also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 2001 (HC)

Global Trust Bank Ltd. Vs. Fargo Freight Ltd., Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-17-2001

Reported in: AIR2002Delhi13; 94(2001)DLT623

..... no 1 it is the case of the appellant that neither discrepancies were rectified nor the earlier letters were responded thereforee on 8 ..... came to the notice of the appellant bank that in fact discrepancies in the documents and also been accepted by the bankers of ..... knowledge about the sequence of events it was urged that once discrepancies had bene pointed out in the letter of credit the court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2001 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Atul Shopping Centre

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-29-2001

Reported in: (2001)78ITD349(Ahd.)

..... floorwise yearwise and structure wise specifications quality of construction etc iii there were various discrepancies omissions deviations and inconsistencies in the construction cost account of the appellant firm ..... by the assessing officer in para 1 of the assessment order regarding alleged discrepancies omissions deviations and inconsistencies are only of very general nature and also factually .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2001 (TRI)

Asstt. Cit Vs. Atul Shopping Centre

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-29-2001

Reported in: (2001)72TTJ(Ahd.)535

..... floorwise year wise and structurewise specifications quality of construction etc iii there were various discrepancies omissions derivations and inconsistencies in the construction cost account of the appellant firm ..... by the assessing officer in para 1 of the assessment order regarding alleged discrepancies omission deviations and inconsistencies are only of very general nature and also factually .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2001 (TRI)

Laxmi Plasters Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-29-2001

Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Ahd.)171

..... particularly the bills delivery memos and payment receipts the assessing officer noticed the following discrepancies which have also been recorded in the assessment order on the further scrutiny of ..... produced the assessing officer elicited clarification from the assessee in respect of the abovementioned discrepancies on scrutiny of the stock register by the assessing officer he found that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Gaharoo

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

Reported in: 2001CriLJ3672; 2002(5)WLC460; 2001(3)WLN153

..... the prosecution eye witnesses on the ground of their evidence being discrepant with the fir was wrong 23 from this point of ..... the accused respondent and no other person in such circumstances if discrepancy occurred in the present case it would not affectthe testimony ..... should be given to the accused respondent merely because there is discrepancy between the version given in the fir and the statement .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //