Differentiation - Judgment Search Results

C.i.T., Madras Vs. K.S. Ratnaswamy

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC525; (1980)14CTR(SC)377; [1980]122ITR217(SC); (1980)2SCC548; [1980]2SCR519

..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....

Chettian Veetil Ammad and anr. Vs. Taluk Land Board and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1573; (1980)1SCC499; [1979]3SCR839

..... legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and justified the treatment is discriminatory if different subjects .....

Manumiya Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1706; 1979CriLJ1384; (1979)4SCC717

..... has no application in india section 3 appreciation of evidence discrepancies held court has to differentiate between normal and material discrepancies while normal discrepancies do not corrode credibility of a partys .....

Neelavathi and ors. Vs. N. Natarajan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC691; (1980)2SCC247; [1980]2SCR307; 1980(12)LC246(SC)

..... citizens the guarantee of equal protection clause of the constitution does not extend to any differential treatment which may result in the application of a special rule of interpretation between the .....

K.M. Mohamed Ghouse and Co., Represented by Partner K.M. Abdul Salam V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT683(Mad)

..... therefore the initial authority has to proceed afresh to recover the differential duty by issuing a fresh show cause notice 4 in ..... importer or exporter 7 admittedly the primary liability to pay the differential duty is on the importer under section 28 but that liability ..... the owner would indicate that all steps for realisation of the differential duty should have been taken against the importer but it .....

Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., Inc. Vs. Ftc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... f which speaks of prohibited discriminations cannot be read as declaring out of bounds price differentials within one or more of the defenses available to sellers such as that the price ..... discrimination or with customers of either of them provided that nothing herein contained shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture sale or delivery .....

Caban Vs. Mohammed

Court: US Supreme Court

..... after a child is born out of wedlock differences between men and women justify some differential treatment of the mother and father in the adoption process most particularly these differences justify ..... result of differences between the mother and the father establish an imposing justification for some differential treatment of the two sexes in this type of situation with this much the court .....

Miller Vs. Youakim

Court: US Supreme Court

..... neither the legislative history nor the structure of the act indicates that congress intended to differentiate among neglected children based on their relationship to their page 440 u s 139 foster ..... the status of the foster parent footnote 26 appellants attribute to congress an intent to differentiate among children who are equally neglected and abused based on a living arrangement bearing no .....

Arun Kumar Mukhopadhyay and ors. Vs. the Institute of Chartered Accoun ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1980Cal40

..... regulation 32 b was also challenged and it was contended that the said regulation differentiated between chartered accountants who had their offices at bombay calcutta delhi new delhi kanpur ..... to the chartered accountants the classification implied in the said regulation was on intelligible differentiation and had rational connection with objectives sought to be achieved thereby it was held .....

State of Kerala Vs. Kumari T.P. Roshana and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1979)1SCC572; [1979]2SCR974

..... in where the executive warily treads the core question is whether there is such substantial differentiation between the two universities in regard to the pre degree or degree courses and ..... university such fleeting factors or ephemeral differences cannot be the solid foundation for a substantial differentiation which is the necessary pre condition for quashing an executive or legislative act as too .....