Skip to content


Differentiate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: differentiate Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 6,022 results (0.063 seconds)
May 03 2000 (TRI)

Eicher Motors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-03-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT515TriDel

..... amounted to non fulfilment of the conditions prescribed under notification no 222 87 and consequently differential customs duty between the full tariff rate of customs duty normally applicable on such ..... the appellants were entitled to the concessional rates available under notification no 74 85 the differential rate of duty confirmed by the commissioner between the tariff rates and the concessional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 2000 (HC)

Charak Pharmaceuticals (i) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-13-2000

Reported in: [2000]109TAXMAN290(Delhi)

..... the said show cause notices on 16 3 1998 that final differential amount due and payable for the period in question was determined ..... the duty finally assessed which is recoverable from the party as differential duty as detailed in the annexure a attached hence i order ..... were ostensibly issued to raise and keep alive the demand for differential duty for the period which was already over since for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2000 (TRI)

Knb Investments (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: May-29-2000

Reported in: (2001)79ITD238(Hyd.)

..... the income tax department is right in holding that the differential price availed by the appellant companies in acquiring the equity ..... and was as such taxable in his hands 3 the differential price has resulted in benefits to the appellant companies according ..... by the assessing officer on the basis of the comparative price differential between the preferential issue price and the market price of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Electronics and Engineering Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT712TriDel

..... therefore the respondents cannot escape from the payment of the differential duty on the goods cleared by them before the final ..... approval of their classification lists the demand of differential duty raised from them after the approval of the classification ..... in the case in hand the demand for payment of differential duty had been raised in consequence of the finalisation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2000 (TRI)

Knb Investments (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: May-29-2000

..... the income tax department is right in holding that the differential price availed by the appellant companies in acquiring the equity ..... and was as such taxable in his bands 3 the differential price has resulted in benefits to the appellant companies according ..... by the assessing officer on the basis of the comparative price differential between the preferential issue price and the market price of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2000 (TRI)

Knb Investments (P) Itd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: May-29-2000

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Hyd.)561

..... whether the it department is right in holding that the differential price availed by the appellant companies in acquiring the equity ..... and was as such taxable in his hands 3 the differential price has resulted in benefits to the appellant companies according ..... by the assessing officer on the basis of the comparative price differential between the preferential issue price and the market price of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 2000 (HC)

Vasantha R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-08-2000

Reported in: (2001)IILLJ843Mad

..... sectors or the handicaps of either sex may compel selectivity but save where the differentiation is demonstrable the rule of equality must govern 70 while considering the scope of ..... parity is the equal treatment of equals in equal circumstances the rule of differentiation is enacting laws differentiating between different persons or things in different circumstances the circumstances which govern .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2000 (TRI)

E.i.D. Parry (India) Limited and Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-24-2000

Reported in: (2000)118STC436Tribunal

..... ad valorem basis by making amendment and also the issue of notices straightaway demanding the differential tax without following procedures the petitioners have preferred the present original petitions 6 mr ..... the part of the legislature to classify the cinema theatres taking into consideration the differentiating circumstances for the purpose of imposition of tax the grievance of the appellants is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 12 2000 (TRI)

India thermit Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-12-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT312TriDel

..... moulds the learned counsel submitted that the assistant commissioner had issued show cause notices demanding differential duty on similar grounds and the appellants had produced copies of the orders placed by ..... the purpose of leving the duty is correct and the commissioner has rightly demanded the differential duty the learned dr placed reliance on the decision in the case of bihar casting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2000 (TRI)

Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-29-2000

Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT70TriDel

..... adjusted against the demand on the goods manufactured by them whereas in the second column differential duty has been computed on the bought out items ld consultant therefore submitted that since ..... classification list of the items became final since there was no appeal therefore demand of differential duty on parts manufactured by the appellant computed on classifying them under chapter heading 84 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //