Different - Judgment Search Results

Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Gopi Chand Rawat

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)5ITD667(Delhi)

..... only for statistical purposes and 1 accordingly order 1 on a difference of opinion between the learned members of the jaipur bench on ..... to by the learned departmental representative the point in issue was different he submitted that the share of shri gopi chand rawat ..... stock is large before the items of jewellery can be sold different permutations combinations settings etc have to be made some items of .....

Karcher Vs. Daggett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a community of interests in some districts for example different television and radio stations different newspapers and different transportation systems serve the northern and southern localities moreover ..... a community of interests in some districts for example different television and radio stations different newspapers and different transportation systems serve the northern and southern localities .....

Brooke Bond India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1988(34)ELT590(Cal)

..... duty 37 learned counsel submitted that it was open to the government to fix different tariff for different classes and descriptions of the same excisable goods it was submitted that such ..... ores was not manufacture the supreme court observed as follows the blending of different qualities of ore possessing differing chemical and physical composition so as to produce ore of the contractual .....

H.H. Maharao Bhim Singhji Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (1984)10ITD558(JP.)

..... the assessee s instant appeals deserve dismissal and are hereby dismissed 1 as there was difference of opinion between the learned members hearing these appeals they had initially referred the following ..... already stated the learned accountant member and the learned judicial member hearing these appeals have differed it may be mentioned that the arguments advanced by the parties have been brought out .....

S.K. Oil and Pulses Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR668

..... each case but it is unilateral power if the implementing agency is to act differently in respect of different units this will lead to a very anomalous situation in that there will be ..... eligibility certificate 51 in our opinion the provisions of the scheme are not for encouraging different units having different capacities to go on with the production and to complete the initial and final .....

Smith Vs. Wade

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of others id at 646 647 n 1 plainly as discussed in greater detail below different states applied different rules and that is all the treatise writer purported to say a similar pattern ..... provide clear guidance and reasonable deterrence might more properly be reserved for a challenge seeking different standards of liability in the first instance as for punitive damages however in the absence .....

Anderson Vs. Celebrezze

Court: US Supreme Court

..... date as an independent both the burdens and benefits of the respective requirements are materially different and the reasons for early filing for a primary candidate are inapplicable to independent ..... an independent but both the burdens and the benefits of the respective requirements are materially different and the reasons for requiring early filing for a primary candidate are inapplicable to .....

Falls City Indus., Inc. Vs. Vanco Beverage, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the very purpose of the defense is to permit a seller to treat different competitive situations differently the prudent businessman responding fairly to what he believes in good faith is ..... itself establish collusion inconsistent with a good faith response particularly since the interstate price difference could well have been attributable not to petitioner but to indiana s extensive regulation .....

Minneapolis Star Vs. Minnesota Comm'r

Court: US Supreme Court

..... explore further infra footnote 12 we have not always avoided evaluating the relative burdens of different methods of taxation in certain cases involving state taxation of the federal government and those ..... systems to ensure revenue and foster their local interests the state may impose different specific taxes upon different trades and professions and may vary the rate of excise upon various products .....

Briscoe Vs. Lahue

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with congressional intent we find this argument unpersuasive the act consisted of several sections establishing different remedies for disorder and violence in the southern states footnote 17 the legislative history ..... rights had been violated therefore for purposes of 1983 analysis there is no material difference between the english rule and the american rule footnote 12 justice marshall s dissent .....