Differ - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differ Sorted by: recent Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.092 seconds)Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers (P.) Ltd.
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
..... respondent was not in a position to explain the discrepancy due to which disputes and differences between the parties arose to amicably settle the disputes the same were referred to arbitration ..... this stand of the second respondent cannot be sustained inasmuch as there is absolutely no difference in the identity between the second and third respondents as they have been acting together .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSona Steering Systems Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(Delhi)213
..... the purpose of deduction under section 80 i the steering unit and axle units were different industrial units and therefore the assessee was entitled to deduction in respect of steering unit ..... further there is no discussion in the assessment order as to whether there existed two different units functioning independently this factual aspect requires verification further it is clarified that all the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers Private
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: (2003)116CompCas188
..... respondent was not in a position to explain the discrepancy due to which disputes and differences between the parties arose to amicably settle the disputes the same were referred to arbitration ..... this stand of the second respondent cannot be sustained inasmuch as there is absolutely no difference in the identity between the second and third respondents as they have been acting together .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuri Bros. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: [2002]122TAXMAN82(NULL)
..... samadhan scheme of 1998 was enforced according to the petitioner under this scheme there was difference vis a vis penalty and immunity from prosecution on payment of arrears of tax at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHimachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Saroj Devi and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: 2002ACJ1146
..... awarded by the tribunal 15 keeping in view the aforesaid decisions of supreme court and different high courts including this court we feel that there being no prohibition in law i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhash Arora Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: [2002]82ITD346(Delhi)
..... two separate persons and the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in the ..... impugned order passed by commissioner appeals in the case of present assessed and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition the learned departmental representative .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
..... the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the ..... cit a in the case of present assessee and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition ..... another company was realisation of shares of first company and the difference between the price of shares of the first company and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatnam Singh Chhabra Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
..... of deposits dates against the figures reveal that these have been made either in different hand or on different occasions since the document was not sealed after its seizure and was kept .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: (2002)82ITD345(Delhi)
..... the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the ..... cit a in the case of present assessee and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition ..... another company was realisation of shares of first company and the difference between the price of shares of the first company and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhuvana House Building Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
..... by purchase or otherwise form residential layouts and allot sites therein to its members with different contractors as under with reference to projects at sl nos 2 4 and 5 above .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial