Skip to content


Differ - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: differ Sorted by: old Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.041 seconds)
Jan 02 2012 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax CochIn Vs. Pushpa Vijoy and Another

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

ramachandrannair j 1 the question raised in the two sets of appeals filed by the revenue against the orders of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

Rajesh Singh Adhikari @ Babloo Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... herein the proclaimed offender rajesh babloo and the deceased appellant arvind narender were arrested on different dates accused rajesh adhikari babloo was the first one to be arrested on 09 08 ..... sushil nagar jeet pal and dhanvinder guni were arrested the kidnapped child was confined at different places by the gangsters and was finally recovered in the wee hours on 10 08 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax-iii Vs. M/S Madras Electrical Conductors Pv ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... the relevant assessment year once for all and the assessee started distributorship to market certain different items of a sister company in view of the above he found that it cannot ..... sale of the conductors the assessee was only carrying on the distributorship of marketing certain different items of a sister company and therefore it cannot be said to be revival of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (TRI)

Newage Laminators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Spl’s Sidhartha Limited

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... by ipcl also contains a processing guide which gives suggestions for the processing parameters of different grades of ldpe in processing ldpe the recommended barrel zone temperatures depending on ..... and r 2 colly discussed above in detail describe the properties and industrial applications of different grades of ldpe and eva the processing parameters including processing melt temperatures of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Sunstar Overseas Limited Vs. M/S. Krbl Ltd and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... all the cited marks india gate and his decision to grant registration may have been different 6 therefore we dispose of the miscellaneous petition as follows the effect of the registration .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Hindustan Unilever Limited and Another Vs. M/S. Girnar Exports, T ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... the respondent the appellant is in the habit of filing different applications for some trade mark with very little reason exhibit ..... should repeatedly apply for registration of marks which are barely different from one another there must be some reason only we ..... it was held that the device of the petitioner was sufficiently different and therefore registration was allowed in registrar of trade marks .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

Reported in: 2012CrLJ1743

..... should be attached to her statement recorded in the manner stated above is entirely a different matter 19 the prosecutrix besides the impairment of hearing and speech was also not educated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-i,h Vs. M/S. Ajay Automation (P) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... 80hhc 1 and section 80hhe 1 of the act there is no substantial or material difference 16 at this stage it is necessary to note that a similar provision was introduced .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

Unknown Vs. Against the

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... first respondent company was not aware that the transfer is to a different group 37 even the contention that the transfer is outside the volvo ..... relied upon by the defendant no 1 are in the context of different facts and are not applicable to the facts of the present case ..... of no help to the defendants being rendered in the context of different facts in the said case respondents came to know of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (HC)

Mangayarkarasi Vs. Natarajan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... when the writings in the face of the documents are by different persons iii whether the courts below are correct in placing the ..... company cases 18 it is held hereunder ldquo there is a difference between issuing of post dated cheques and cheques without putting the ..... because some of the writings in the said document are by different persons and the point no 2 is answered against the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //