Dialectically - Year 2015 - Judgments

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Mustak Ali and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Devi Lal Dhaker and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Fateh Singh Bhati and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Sumitra Vaishnav Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Rajkumar and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Mahesh Kumar Patidar and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2015 (HC)

Moinuddin Mansuri and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-30-2015

..... in the firs place there was no material to indicate that dialects vary from district to district consequently there was no material ..... from one district was not likely to be familiar with the dialect of another district for which he applied for training there ..... criteria for recruitment if the emphasis is really on the regional dialect the reason given by the apex court for declaring preferential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 2015 (HC)

Bhagwan Das @Chokanni Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2015

..... been recorded the victim was of a tamil nationality she could not understand the local dialect i e either hindi or english accordingly an interpreter had been produced k raja pw ..... this court also notes that the child was not familiar with the hindi or english dialect she was knowing only tamil she was accompanied by an interpreter both at the time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2015 (HC)

Ekbal Sah and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-13-2015

..... wanted to leave the place of occurrence some of the accused said in their vernacular dialect tum bhi maje le lo 42 ext 10 is the confessional statement of accused anwar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2015 (HC)

Habib Ansari and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-13-2015

..... wanted to leave the place of occurrence some of the accused said in their vernacular dialect tum bhi maje le lo 42 ext 10 is the confessional statement of accused anwar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dialectically - Judgment Search Results