Devolution - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: devolution Sorted by: recent Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.007 seconds)Sait Nagjee Purushotham and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-20-1963
Reported in: AIR1967SC617; [1964]51ITR849(SC); [1964]6SCR91
..... assessable unit or a distinct assessable entity and in such a case there is no devolution of the business as a whole this court pointed out that though under the law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Raja Yadavendra Dutta Dubey of Jaunpur.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-19-1963
Reported in: [1964]53ITR770(All)
..... male issue another rule which applies only to a coparcener in hindu law is the devolution of joint family property by survivorship this is one of the accepted consequences of an ..... the coparcenary the proviso under sub section 3 would seem to indicate that a mere devolution of the husbands interest would not otherwise affect the joint family status as such or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiramabai Vs. Kalgonda Bhimgonda and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-18-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Bom263; (1964)66BOMLR351
..... prevention of fragmentation of agricultural holdings or for the fixation of ceilings or for the devolution of tenancy rights in respect of such holdings mr paranjape relies on this section he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanakarathanammal Vs. V.S. Loganatha Mudaliar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-18-1963
Reported in: AIR1965SC271; [1964]6SCR1
..... of s 10 2 b is that the property which is the subject matter of devolution must itself be a gift from the husband to the wife can we say that ..... of s 10 2 b is that the property which is the subject matter of devolution must itself be a gift from the husband to the wife in deciding under which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Beepathumma and ors. Vs. V.S. Kadambolithaya and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-06-1963
Reported in: AIR1965SC241; [1964]5SCR836
..... 2 000 we may now omit for the time being a reference to the further devolution of the share of kunhi pakki son of kunhammu hajar in respect of whose share .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVriddhachalam Pillai Vs. Chaldean Syrian Bank Ltd., and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-03-1963
Reported in: AIR1964SC1425; [1964]5SCR647
..... course of some valid statutory provision to determine either the rights to property or its devolution the reasoning of the learned judges therefore proceeds upon a basic wrong assumption that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamji Dixit and anr. Vs. Bhrigunath and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-29-1963
Reported in: AIR1965All1
..... being determined in accordance with section 171 sub section 2 prescribes three different methods of devolution one where a female who has before the abolition of zamindari inherited the sir and ..... 29 it may be observed that while these interconnected provisions arc assorted under the heading devolution section 152 find its allied provisions are grouped together under the heading transfers thus while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Jaipur Udyog Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-21-1963
Reported in: AIR1965Raj162
..... a special law we feel that the obligations arising out of such an agreement after devolution on the union of india by virtue of article 295 would not lose the character .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Venkatarama Iyer Vs. Abdul Karim and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-08-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Mad365
..... the litigation order 22 rule 10 c p c refers to an assignment creation or devolution of any interest during the pendency of suit but it clearly cannot apply to an ..... impleaded in the suit as parties to the litigation refers to an assignment creation or devolution of any interest during the pendency of suit but it clearly cannot apply to an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Venkatarama Iyer Vs. Abdul Karim Alias Nurpasha and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-08-1963
Reported in: (1964)1MLJ268
..... parties to the litigation order 22 rule 10 civil procedure code refers to an assignment creation or devolution of any interest during the pendency of suit but it clearly cannot apply to an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial