Skip to content


Development Consent - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: development consent Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 19 results (0.086 seconds)
Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Newark Vs. Central R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... creation of the port of new york district and for the comprehensive development of that port congress gave its consent to the agreement c 151 laws of new jersey 1921 c 154 ..... pursuant to the compact a comprehensive plan for the development of the port of new york was approved by both states and consented to by congress c 9 laws of new jersey .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 1925 (PC)

Musst. Farid-un-nisa Vs. Munshi Mukhtar Ahmed

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-06-1925

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR193

what they are doing it has only given the special development which indian social usages make necessary to the general rules

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 1925 (PC)

Dodbasappa Dharmappa Vs. Pradhanappa Venkappa

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Bom33; (1925)27BOMLR1318

..... take into consideration the fact that the plea of fraud was developed during the trial and is taken by the subordinate judge in ..... the trial court appears to have been taken that the appellant consented to certain previous depositions being put in and that therefore the ..... to adduce additional evidence no fresh evidence was led but by consent two depositions taken in a previous case were brought on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 1925 (PC)

Munir Vs. King-emperor

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-28-1925

Reported in: AIR1926All189

..... that the girl appeared to be about 17 years old and that her development was compatible with the age of 20 years he accordingly acquitted the ..... inasmuch as the statement of the girl was that she had not consented to the re marriage and that the trial court had no jurisdiction ..... came and told her about it is not true she had evidently consented to be married to munir for she says that there was a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1925 (PC)

Guruswami Pillai Vs. Veerabhadra Thavalkaran and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-13-1925

Reported in: 95Ind.Cas.325

..... previous subordinate judge considered the effect of ex i and that the suit has been developed into one based on the agreement ex i but there are no allegations in the ..... the possession of the defendants and that the plaintiffs were given possession with the defendants consent he also found that the plaintiffs paid the emoluments due to the defendants upto the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1925 (PC)

Gurusami Pillai Vs. Veerabhadra Thavalkaran and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-13-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Mad695

..... previous subordinate judge considered the effect of ex 1 and that the suit has been developed into one based on the agreement ex 1 but there are no allegations in the ..... the possession of the defendants and that the plaintiffs were given possession with the defendants consent he also found that the plaintiffs paid the emoluments due to the defendants up to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 16 1925 (FN)

Concrete Appliances Co. Vs. Gomery

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-16-1925

skill to known elements in the course of a natural development of the art p 269 u s 184 4 the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 1925 (FN)

Cement Manufacturers' Assn. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-01-1925

selected their use is rather the natural result of the development of the business within certain defined geographical areas when a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 1925 (FN)

Gitlow Vs. People

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-08-1925

and winnipeg footnote 3 were cited as instances of a development already verging on revolutionary action and suggestive of proletarian page

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Work Vs. United States Ex Rel. Rives

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

be confined to expenditures for construction equipment and machinery in development of such property we are asked to reject this interpretation

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //