Determinative - Judgment Search Results

Cruzan Vs. Director, Mdh

Court: US Supreme Court

..... functional guidelines for the exercise of the common law and constitutional rights of self determination attending physician authorized to remove treatment after finding that patient is in a terminal ..... that may be asserted is an interest in safe guarding the accuracy of that determination accuracy therefore must be our touchstone missouri may constitutionally impose only those procedural requirements .....

Walton Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... eighth amendment principle that a capital defendant is entitled to an individualized sentencing determination which involves the consideration of all relevant mitigating evidence the first is the ..... nevertheless may stand because the appellate court applying a satisfactory limiting construction independently determined that the murder was especially cruel for three independent reasons i cannot accept .....

Sullivan Vs. Zebley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to function in the workplace statutory scheme contemplates that disability hearings will be individualized determinations page 493 u s 529 the statutory standard for child disability is explicitly ..... functional consequences of the impairments irrespective of their nature or extent cannot justify a determination of equivalence emphases in original the secretary explicitly has set the medical criteria .....

Smt. Archana Guha Vs. Ranjit Alias Runu Guha Neogi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2012

..... s appearance for the complainant and such allegations having failed on consideration against the determinations as made by the learned magistrate this court was moved in its criminal revisional ..... quasi judicial body cannot in general be impeached otherwise than on appeal unless the erroneous determination relates to a matter on which the jurisdiction of that body depends these principles .....

American Trucking Ass'ns Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... if those rights had not been clearly established when the violation occurred such a determination merely makes municipalities like private individuals responsible for anticipating developments in the law ..... the protections available to criminal defendants see generally beytagh supra therefore whenever the court determined that retroactive application of a new rule would be inequitable the court was .....

Kaiser Alumium Vs. Bonjorno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... judgment in this case occurred before october 1 1982 we reverse the court of appeals determination that amended 1961 governs the calculation of postjudgment interest iv finally in its cross petition ..... apply the rules of construction that the court has followed for almost two centuries in determining the temporal operation of federal statutes the court discerns an apparent tension between the rule .....

idaho Vs. Wright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... since such safeguards may in many instances be inappropriate or unnecessary to a determination whether a given statement is sufficiently trustworthy for confrontation clause purposes rather such ..... s statements emphasize the relevance not the irrelevance of corroborating evidence to the determination whether an unavailable child witness s statements bear particularized guarantees of trustworthiness .....

Grady Vs. Corbin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... we stated in brown v ohio the blockburger test is not the only standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense even if two offenses are sufficiently ..... and punishment under the other ibid blockburger furnishes we have observed the established test for determining whether successive prosecutions arising out of the same events are for the same offence .....

Washington Vs. Harper

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mentally disturbed patient s intentions or a substituted judgment approximating those intentions can be determined in a single judicial hearing apart from the realities of frequent and ongoing ..... experience and scholarly opinions suggest that the supposed protections of an adversary proceeding to determine the appropriateness of medical decisions for the commitment and treatment of mental and .....

Clemons Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state appellate courts can and do give each defendant an individualized and reliable sentencing determination based on his circumstances background and crime furthermore contrary to clemons claim an appellate ..... aggravating circumstances could not possibly affect the balance what is important is an individualized determination on the basis of the character of the individual and the circumstances of .....