Determinability - Judgment Search Results

American Lines Vs. Louisville and N. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with the complex problems of developing a general standard of costing to use in determining inherent advantage in situations involving intermodal competition in the broad context of a rulemaking ..... by competitive pressure we conclude therefore that the commission adequately articulated its reasons for determining that the railroads rate would impair the inherent advantage enjoyed by the barge truck .....

HardIn Vs. Kentucky Utilities Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of power petitioners argue that the court of appeals gave no weight whatever to this determination and urge that the finding should instead have been treated like an administrative interpretation ..... the economic and technical circumstances of this particular locality suggest that the tva board s determination here exceeded the outer boundaries of choice contemplated in the act certainly nothing in .....

Hanover Shoe, Inc. Vs. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision united contends that the decision in the government s suit against it did not determine that united s leasing practice was an instrument of monopolization that hanover sustained no injury ..... united and with its impact on potential and actual competition when the applicable standard for determining monopolization under 2 is applied to these facts it must be concluded that the district .....

Ramji Dayawahla and Sons Private Ltd. Vs. Invest Import

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1969Cal253,73CWN533

..... plaint which becomes dead for all purposes here is therefore final determination of the right of the forum the international chamber of ..... defendant is not liable to pay anything that is finally determined against him and therefore in their lordships view the decree ..... the terras a matter which is yet to be finally determined the first ground prevailing the second one becomes an obiter dictum excise .....

The State of Madras Represented by the Collector of Ramanathapuram Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1969)2MLJ281

..... legislature may entrust the tribunal or body with a jurisdiction which includes the jurisdiction to determine whether the preliminary state of facts exists as well as the jurisdiction on finding ..... jurisdiction by wrongly deciding certain facts to exist because the legislature gave them jurisdiction to determine all the facts including the existence of the preliminary facts on which the further .....

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Workmen and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC919; [1970(20)FLR176]; 1970LabIC787; (1969)IILLJ755SC; [1969]2SCR307

..... allowance the tribunal was apparently of the view that in determining the question the definition of the word wages in the ..... exercise to the courts accustomed to apply settled principles to facts determined by the application of the judicial process an essay into ..... have in course of time acquired a right to gratuity on determination of employment provided the employer can afford having regard to .....

Penn-central Merger Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... commerce commission icc erred in permitting immediate consummation of the penn central merger without determining the ultimate fate of the erie lackawanna delaware hudson and boston maine railroads the ..... basis consonant with the principles governing judicial review for setting aside the commission s determination approved by the district court that the public interest directives of the governing .....

Chaturvedi (R.P.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1969)ILLJ169Raj

..... equally appropriate and effective it is conceived that the court will follow similar principles in determining whether to grant an injunction in lieu the question therefore arises whether the non petitioners ..... including the provisos as reproduced above gives no indication that the seniority has to be determined inter se amongst the professors readers and lecturers of both the wings viz the clinical .....

Alderman Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... existence of nonrelevant illegal evidence will not prevent a prosecution only the method of determining the relevance of the lawlessly obtained material to the prosecution would vary according to whether ..... defendant or his counsel would substantially injure national security interests and he may determine in camera whether the materials are arguably relevant to the defendant s prosecution footnote 3 .....

Protective Committee Vs. Anderson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... considered the case in erroneous legal perspective and emphasizing that its obligation was to determine whether the trial judge had abused his discretion or reached conclusions which were ..... and reasonable doubts at the same time however it is essential that every important determination in reorganization proceedings receive the informed independent judgment of the bankruptcy court national surety .....