Dependency - Judgment Search Results

Asha Rani and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H435; [1984]56CompCas268(P& H)

..... been called the interest theory resting on the principle that irrespective of other considerations the dependents must be given a lump sum amount as compensation the interest wherefrom would be ..... it was held that both the interest theory and the method of multiplying the annual dependency for the remaining years of life expectancy were slippery and unsatisfactory methods of compensation specifically .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Swapan Kumar Guha and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC949; (1982)1CompLJ217(SC); 1982CriLJ819; 1982(1)SCALE38; (1982)1SCC561; [1982]3SCR121

..... section requires is that such reciprocal promises express or implied must depend for their performance on the happening of an event or ..... conducting a scheme for making quick or easy money which was dependent upon an event or contingency relative or applicable to the ..... 70 whether an offence has been disclosed or not must necessarily depend on the facts and circumstances of each particular case in .....

Merrion Vs. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to protect tribal self government or to control internal relations is inconsistent with the dependent status of the tribes and so cannot survive without express congressional delegation montana v ..... indian tribe and nonmembers of the tribe these limitations rest on the fact that the dependent status of indian tribes within our territorial jurisdiction is necessarily inconsistent with their freedom .....

Toll Vs. Moreno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... et seq at the time suit was brought the named plaintiffs in this case were dependents of employees of either the inter american development bank or the international bank for ..... court s ignorance of relevant differences leads it into error the named class representatives are dependents of employees of either the inter american development bank or the international bank for reconstruction .....

Mine Workers Vs. Robinson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sole and exclusive benefit of the employees of the contributing employer and their families and dependents the court held that any rule denying benefits to employees on whose behalf significant ..... be maintained for the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees and their families and dependents means that eligibility rules fixed by a collective bargaining agreement must meet a reasonableness .....

Smt. Kashmiran Mathur and ors. Vs. Sardar Rajendrasingh and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1983MP24; [1984]56CompCas146(MP)

..... be taken into consideration while determining the amount of compensation answer to this question will depend on several factors family pension may be contributory or non contributory under the m p ..... few victims compensated the entitlement to tort compensation as we have known for some time depends too much on chance the commission were convinced that the fault principle operates with particular .....

Arunaben and ors. Vs. Mehmoodbhai Imamali Kaji and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1983Guj10; (1983)1GLR156

..... illegal and unjustified 2 the capitalization of the loss of dependency benefit economic loss by adoption of the multiplier of 10 ..... therefore be awardable as additional damages for the loss of dependency benefit economic loss 24 the conventional award for the loss ..... the impugned award the pecuniary benefit accordingly derived by the dependants heirs flows out of the statutory liability of the employer .....

Colorado Vs. New Mexico

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to prevent a proposed diversion by colorado from the laramie river this court calculated the dependable supply available to both states subtracted the senior wyoming uses and permitted colorado to divert ..... an amount not exceeding the balance footnote 10 in calculating the dependable supply we placed on each state the duty to employ financially and physically feasible .....

Ramesh Chandra and ors. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corpor ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1982MP165

..... at the outset that appellants 1 to 6 are neither the dependents mentioned in section 1a of the fatal accidents act 1855 nor ..... hindu succession act 1956 appellant no 7 alone who is a dependent under the fatal accidents act and also a legal representative in ..... every year the capitalised value of the income spent on the dependents subject to relevant deductions is the pecuniary loss sustained by the .....

The Management, Southern Textiles Limited, Coimbatore Vs. the United T ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1983)ILLJ435Mad

..... the dispute have a direct or substantial interest and this must depend on the facts and circumstances of each particular case applying these ..... order of reference the question of employment to the heirs or dependents on the basis of the ratio demanded by the present workmen ..... makes a definite provision for the employment of their heirs and dependents it is an interest which is direct and substantial as .....